2020-11-24 16:23:06

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mmc: Support kmsg dumper based on pstore/blk

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:40:21PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> It looks like Christoph is planning for some rewrite of the pstore
> code, so let's see what that means in regards to this.

Here is what I posted last month:

http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/pstore

Kees wanted to chime in with a few thing he'd like to see done
differently, but I've not seen the actual comments yet.

In respect to the eMMC support what I've done should mostly
just work, it would have to adopt to the slightly different
registration interface and just call register_pstore_device() with
its own ops.


2020-11-26 09:42:35

by Bhaskara Budiredla

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mmc: Support kmsg dumper based on pstore/blk

Sure, I will tune to those discussions and would wait for that.
- Bhaskara

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
>Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 9:49 PM
>To: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
>Cc: Bhaskara Budiredla <[email protected]>; Kees Cook
><[email protected]>; Colin Cross <[email protected]>; Tony Luck
><[email protected]>; Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <[email protected]>;
>[email protected]; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
>[email protected]>; Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mmc: Support kmsg dumper based on
>pstore/blk
>
>On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:40:21PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> It looks like Christoph is planning for some rewrite of the pstore
>> code, so let's see what that means in regards to this.
>
>Here is what I posted last month:
>
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
>3A__git.infradead.org_users_hch_misc.git_shortlog_refs_heads_pstore&d=
>DwIBAg&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=9P_lSljSO7KnQNkCGsgu9x_Op4ms
>tSdqWN3Olr4bUv0&m=q8IjbcWL5TERE5I_titSsMtZA2l6QrRmBgu0lc8wpko&s=
>T6P9lsMAsulOHqb4szJ553K0z2eYB5Tliq7UqFMth-g&e=
>
>Kees wanted to chime in with a few thing he'd like to see done differently,
>but I've not seen the actual comments yet.
>
>In respect to the eMMC support what I've done should mostly just work, it
>would have to adopt to the slightly different registration interface and just call
>register_pstore_device() with its own ops.