> Fix this by increase object reference count.
I find this description incomplete according to the proposed changes.
Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?
Regards,
Markus
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 10:57:55AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Fix this by increase object reference count.
>
> I find this description incomplete according to the proposed changes.
>
> Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You seem to
have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch
submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list.
I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother
developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with
comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore this suggestion, it is not needed to be
followed at all, as the person/bot/AI that sent it is on almost all
Linux kernel maintainer's blacklists and is ignored by them. Please
feel free to also do the same.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
Hi Markus.
I don't need to add Fix tag to view the code.
________________________________________
??????: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
????ʱ??: 2020??6??5?? 16:57
?ռ???: Zhang, Qiang; [email protected]
????: [email protected]; [email protected]; Alan Stern; Felipe Balbi; Greg Kroah-Hartman; Kyungtae Kim
????: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: function: printer: Fix use-after-free in __lock_acquire()
> Fix this by increase object reference count.
I find this description incomplete according to the proposed changes.
Would you like to add the tag ??Fixes?? to the commit message?
Regards,
Markus
> I don't need to add Fix tag to view the code.
I have got understanding difficulties for this kind of feedback.
How much do you care for corresponding patch review concerns?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=af7b4801030c07637840191c69eb666917e4135d#n183
Regards,
Markus
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 12:55:13PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I don't need to add Fix tag to view the code.
>
> I have got understanding difficulties for this kind of feedback.
> How much do you care for corresponding patch review concerns?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=af7b4801030c07637840191c69eb666917e4135d#n183
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review
comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list.
I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother
developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with
comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not needed
to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability
to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot