pwm-cells are already required by pwm.yaml schema.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml
index ff6880a02ce6..ec9f6bab798c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ required:
- compatible
- reg
- clocks
- - '#pwm-cells'
additionalProperties: false
--
2.32.0
Hi,
>
>pwm-cells are already required by pwm.yaml schema.
>
>Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Vijayakannan Ayyathurai <[email protected]>
Hello Krzysztof,
when I read the subject line I thought the patch intention to be wrong.
Maybe make that:
dt-bindings: intel,keembay-pwm: Don't require #pwm-cells twice
?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
On 14/02/2022 19:28, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> when I read the subject line I thought the patch intention to be wrong.
> Maybe make that:
>
> dt-bindings: intel,keembay-pwm: Don't require #pwm-cells twice
>
> ?
Ah, yes, this sounds better. I'll send a v2.
Best regards,
Krzysztof