event_handler runs under atomic context and may not acquire reslock. We
can still guarantee that the handler won't be called after suspend by
clearing nb_registered, unregistering the handler and flushing the
workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <[email protected]>
---
drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 14 +++-----------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
index 6e6490c85be2..bebfba530247 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
@@ -2872,8 +2872,8 @@ static int mlx5_vdpa_suspend(struct vdpa_device *vdev)
int i;
down_write(&ndev->reslock);
- mlx5_notifier_unregister(mvdev->mdev, &ndev->nb);
ndev->nb_registered = false;
+ mlx5_notifier_unregister(mvdev->mdev, &ndev->nb);
flush_workqueue(ndev->mvdev.wq);
for (i = 0; i < ndev->cur_num_vqs; i++) {
mvq = &ndev->vqs[i];
@@ -3051,7 +3051,7 @@ static void update_carrier(struct work_struct *work)
else
ndev->config.status &= cpu_to_mlx5vdpa16(mvdev, ~VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
- if (ndev->config_cb.callback)
+ if (ndev->nb_registered && ndev->config_cb.callback)
ndev->config_cb.callback(ndev->config_cb.private);
kfree(wqent);
@@ -3068,21 +3068,13 @@ static int event_handler(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, void *p
switch (eqe->sub_type) {
case MLX5_PORT_CHANGE_SUBTYPE_DOWN:
case MLX5_PORT_CHANGE_SUBTYPE_ACTIVE:
- down_read(&ndev->reslock);
- if (!ndev->nb_registered) {
- up_read(&ndev->reslock);
- return NOTIFY_DONE;
- }
wqent = kzalloc(sizeof(*wqent), GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!wqent) {
- up_read(&ndev->reslock);
+ if (!wqent)
return NOTIFY_DONE;
- }
wqent->mvdev = &ndev->mvdev;
INIT_WORK(&wqent->work, update_carrier);
queue_work(ndev->mvdev.wq, &wqent->work);
- up_read(&ndev->reslock);
ret = NOTIFY_OK;
break;
default:
--
2.38.1
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 9:45 PM Eli Cohen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> event_handler runs under atomic context and may not acquire reslock. We
> can still guarantee that the handler won't be called after suspend by
> clearing nb_registered, unregistering the handler and flushing the
> workqueue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 14 +++-----------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> index 6e6490c85be2..bebfba530247 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> @@ -2872,8 +2872,8 @@ static int mlx5_vdpa_suspend(struct vdpa_device *vdev)
> int i;
>
> down_write(&ndev->reslock);
> - mlx5_notifier_unregister(mvdev->mdev, &ndev->nb);
> ndev->nb_registered = false;
> + mlx5_notifier_unregister(mvdev->mdev, &ndev->nb);
I wonder why this can help anything. And if it does, we have simliar
logic in mlx5_vdpa_dev_del() do we need to fix that as well?
Thanks
> flush_workqueue(ndev->mvdev.wq);
> for (i = 0; i < ndev->cur_num_vqs; i++) {
> mvq = &ndev->vqs[i];
> @@ -3051,7 +3051,7 @@ static void update_carrier(struct work_struct *work)
> else
> ndev->config.status &= cpu_to_mlx5vdpa16(mvdev, ~VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
>
> - if (ndev->config_cb.callback)
> + if (ndev->nb_registered && ndev->config_cb.callback)
> ndev->config_cb.callback(ndev->config_cb.private);
>
> kfree(wqent);
> @@ -3068,21 +3068,13 @@ static int event_handler(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, void *p
> switch (eqe->sub_type) {
> case MLX5_PORT_CHANGE_SUBTYPE_DOWN:
> case MLX5_PORT_CHANGE_SUBTYPE_ACTIVE:
> - down_read(&ndev->reslock);
> - if (!ndev->nb_registered) {
> - up_read(&ndev->reslock);
> - return NOTIFY_DONE;
> - }
> wqent = kzalloc(sizeof(*wqent), GFP_ATOMIC);
> - if (!wqent) {
> - up_read(&ndev->reslock);
> + if (!wqent)
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> - }
>
> wqent->mvdev = &ndev->mvdev;
> INIT_WORK(&wqent->work, update_carrier);
> queue_work(ndev->mvdev.wq, &wqent->work);
> - up_read(&ndev->reslock);
> ret = NOTIFY_OK;
> break;
> default:
> --
> 2.38.1
>
> From: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, 14 November 2022 9:53
> To: Eli Cohen <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> foundation.org; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] vdpa/mlx5: Avoid using reslock in event_handler
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 9:45 PM Eli Cohen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > event_handler runs under atomic context and may not acquire reslock. We
> > can still guarantee that the handler won't be called after suspend by
> > clearing nb_registered, unregistering the handler and flushing the
> > workqueue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 14 +++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > index 6e6490c85be2..bebfba530247 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > @@ -2872,8 +2872,8 @@ static int mlx5_vdpa_suspend(struct vdpa_device
> *vdev)
> > int i;
> >
> > down_write(&ndev->reslock);
> > - mlx5_notifier_unregister(mvdev->mdev, &ndev->nb);
> > ndev->nb_registered = false;
> > + mlx5_notifier_unregister(mvdev->mdev, &ndev->nb);
>
> I wonder why this can help anything.
I think you were concerned that async events will come when the device was suspended. Since we can't take reslock, I think this guarantees that we won't get any events after suspension.
> And if it does, we have simliar
> logic in mlx5_vdpa_dev_del() do we need to fix that as well?
>
We have the same construct there only that I set nb_registered = false after unregistering the notifier. So I probably need to move it before mlx5_notifier_unregister().
> Thanks
>
> > flush_workqueue(ndev->mvdev.wq);
> > for (i = 0; i < ndev->cur_num_vqs; i++) {
> > mvq = &ndev->vqs[i];
> > @@ -3051,7 +3051,7 @@ static void update_carrier(struct work_struct
> *work)
> > else
> > ndev->config.status &= cpu_to_mlx5vdpa16(mvdev,
> ~VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
> >
> > - if (ndev->config_cb.callback)
> > + if (ndev->nb_registered && ndev->config_cb.callback)
> > ndev->config_cb.callback(ndev->config_cb.private);
> >
> > kfree(wqent);
> > @@ -3068,21 +3068,13 @@ static int event_handler(struct notifier_block
> *nb, unsigned long event, void *p
> > switch (eqe->sub_type) {
> > case MLX5_PORT_CHANGE_SUBTYPE_DOWN:
> > case MLX5_PORT_CHANGE_SUBTYPE_ACTIVE:
> > - down_read(&ndev->reslock);
> > - if (!ndev->nb_registered) {
> > - up_read(&ndev->reslock);
> > - return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > - }
> > wqent = kzalloc(sizeof(*wqent), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > - if (!wqent) {
> > - up_read(&ndev->reslock);
> > + if (!wqent)
> > return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > - }
> >
> > wqent->mvdev = &ndev->mvdev;
> > INIT_WORK(&wqent->work, update_carrier);
> > queue_work(ndev->mvdev.wq, &wqent->work);
> > - up_read(&ndev->reslock);
> > ret = NOTIFY_OK;
> > break;
> > default:
> > --
> > 2.38.1
> >
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 4:58 PM Eli Cohen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Monday, 14 November 2022 9:53
> > To: Eli Cohen <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> > foundation.org; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] vdpa/mlx5: Avoid using reslock in event_handler
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 9:45 PM Eli Cohen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > event_handler runs under atomic context and may not acquire reslock. We
> > > can still guarantee that the handler won't be called after suspend by
> > > clearing nb_registered, unregistering the handler and flushing the
> > > workqueue.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 14 +++-----------
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > index 6e6490c85be2..bebfba530247 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > @@ -2872,8 +2872,8 @@ static int mlx5_vdpa_suspend(struct vdpa_device
> > *vdev)
> > > int i;
> > >
> > > down_write(&ndev->reslock);
> > > - mlx5_notifier_unregister(mvdev->mdev, &ndev->nb);
> > > ndev->nb_registered = false;
> > > + mlx5_notifier_unregister(mvdev->mdev, &ndev->nb);
> >
> > I wonder why this can help anything.
> I think you were concerned that async events will come when the device was suspended. Since we can't take reslock, I think this guarantees that we won't get any events after suspension.
>
Ok, I see.
> > And if it does, we have simliar
> > logic in mlx5_vdpa_dev_del() do we need to fix that as well?
> >
> We have the same construct there only that I set nb_registered = false after unregistering the notifier. So I probably need to move it before mlx5_notifier_unregister().
Right.
Thanks
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > > flush_workqueue(ndev->mvdev.wq);
> > > for (i = 0; i < ndev->cur_num_vqs; i++) {
> > > mvq = &ndev->vqs[i];
> > > @@ -3051,7 +3051,7 @@ static void update_carrier(struct work_struct
> > *work)
> > > else
> > > ndev->config.status &= cpu_to_mlx5vdpa16(mvdev,
> > ~VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
> > >
> > > - if (ndev->config_cb.callback)
> > > + if (ndev->nb_registered && ndev->config_cb.callback)
> > > ndev->config_cb.callback(ndev->config_cb.private);
> > >
> > > kfree(wqent);
> > > @@ -3068,21 +3068,13 @@ static int event_handler(struct notifier_block
> > *nb, unsigned long event, void *p
> > > switch (eqe->sub_type) {
> > > case MLX5_PORT_CHANGE_SUBTYPE_DOWN:
> > > case MLX5_PORT_CHANGE_SUBTYPE_ACTIVE:
> > > - down_read(&ndev->reslock);
> > > - if (!ndev->nb_registered) {
> > > - up_read(&ndev->reslock);
> > > - return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > - }
> > > wqent = kzalloc(sizeof(*wqent), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > - if (!wqent) {
> > > - up_read(&ndev->reslock);
> > > + if (!wqent)
> > > return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > - }
> > >
> > > wqent->mvdev = &ndev->mvdev;
> > > INIT_WORK(&wqent->work, update_carrier);
> > > queue_work(ndev->mvdev.wq, &wqent->work);
> > > - up_read(&ndev->reslock);
> > > ret = NOTIFY_OK;
> > > break;
> > > default:
> > > --
> > > 2.38.1
> > >
>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:00 PM Jason Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 4:58 PM Eli Cohen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Monday, 14 November 2022 9:53
> > > To: Eli Cohen <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> > > foundation.org; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > > [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] vdpa/mlx5: Avoid using reslock in event_handler
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 9:45 PM Eli Cohen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > event_handler runs under atomic context and may not acquire reslock. We
> > > > can still guarantee that the handler won't be called after suspend by
> > > > clearing nb_registered, unregistering the handler and flushing the
> > > > workqueue.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 14 +++-----------
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > > index 6e6490c85be2..bebfba530247 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > > @@ -2872,8 +2872,8 @@ static int mlx5_vdpa_suspend(struct vdpa_device
> > > *vdev)
> > > > int i;
> > > >
> > > > down_write(&ndev->reslock);
> > > > - mlx5_notifier_unregister(mvdev->mdev, &ndev->nb);
> > > > ndev->nb_registered = false;
> > > > + mlx5_notifier_unregister(mvdev->mdev, &ndev->nb);
> > >
> > > I wonder why this can help anything.
> > I think you were concerned that async events will come when the device was suspended. Since we can't take reslock, I think this guarantees that we won't get any events after suspension.
> >
>
> Ok, I see.
>
> > > And if it does, we have simliar
> > > logic in mlx5_vdpa_dev_del() do we need to fix that as well?
> > >
> > We have the same construct there only that I set nb_registered = false after unregistering the notifier. So I probably need to move it before mlx5_notifier_unregister().
>
> Right.
>
> Thanks
So I'm fine with this patch.
Acked-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
Thanks
>
> >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > > flush_workqueue(ndev->mvdev.wq);
> > > > for (i = 0; i < ndev->cur_num_vqs; i++) {
> > > > mvq = &ndev->vqs[i];
> > > > @@ -3051,7 +3051,7 @@ static void update_carrier(struct work_struct
> > > *work)
> > > > else
> > > > ndev->config.status &= cpu_to_mlx5vdpa16(mvdev,
> > > ~VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
> > > >
> > > > - if (ndev->config_cb.callback)
> > > > + if (ndev->nb_registered && ndev->config_cb.callback)
> > > > ndev->config_cb.callback(ndev->config_cb.private);
> > > >
> > > > kfree(wqent);
> > > > @@ -3068,21 +3068,13 @@ static int event_handler(struct notifier_block
> > > *nb, unsigned long event, void *p
> > > > switch (eqe->sub_type) {
> > > > case MLX5_PORT_CHANGE_SUBTYPE_DOWN:
> > > > case MLX5_PORT_CHANGE_SUBTYPE_ACTIVE:
> > > > - down_read(&ndev->reslock);
> > > > - if (!ndev->nb_registered) {
> > > > - up_read(&ndev->reslock);
> > > > - return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > > - }
> > > > wqent = kzalloc(sizeof(*wqent), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > > - if (!wqent) {
> > > > - up_read(&ndev->reslock);
> > > > + if (!wqent)
> > > > return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > > - }
> > > >
> > > > wqent->mvdev = &ndev->mvdev;
> > > > INIT_WORK(&wqent->work, update_carrier);
> > > > queue_work(ndev->mvdev.wq, &wqent->work);
> > > > - up_read(&ndev->reslock);
> > > > ret = NOTIFY_OK;
> > > > break;
> > > > default:
> > > > --
> > > > 2.38.1
> > > >
> >