Fix the PCI comment for the IS-200 card
Signed-off-by: Cameron Williams <[email protected]>
---
This is a resubmission series for the patch series below. That series
was lots of changes sent to lots of maintainers, this series is just for
the tty/serial/8250 subsystem.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/DU0PR02MB789950E64D808DB57E9D7312C4F8A@DU0PR02MB7899.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/DU0PR02MB7899DE53DFC900EFB50E53F2C4F8A@DU0PR02MB7899.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/DU0PR02MB7899033E7E81EAF3694BC20AC4F8A@DU0PR02MB7899.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/DU0PR02MB7899EABA8C3DCAC94DCC79D4C4F8A@DU0PR02MB7899.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com/
drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c
index 62a9bd30b4db..ecb4e9acc70d 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c
@@ -4917,7 +4917,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id serial_pci_tbl[] = {
* IntaShield IS-200
*/
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTASHIELD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTASHIELD_IS200,
- PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, /* 135a.0811 */
+ PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, /* 135a.0d80 */
pbn_b2_2_115200 },
/*
* IntaShield IS-400
--
2.42.0
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:11:09PM +0100, Cameron Williams wrote:
> Fix the PCI comment for the IS-200 card
"Fix" it how? What was wrong with it, and what is now right with it?
>
> Signed-off-by: Cameron Williams <[email protected]>
> ---
> This is a resubmission series for the patch series below. That series
> was lots of changes sent to lots of maintainers, this series is just for
> the tty/serial/8250 subsystem.
Your patches here are not threaded at all, was that intentional? Our
tools will not pick them up properly, and so I would have to do it by
hand, slowing things down and making me dread handling them. Any reason
you didn't just use 'git send-email' to send it?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 10:28:33AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:11:09PM +0100, Cameron Williams wrote:
> > Fix the PCI comment for the IS-200 card
>
> "Fix" it how? What was wrong with it, and what is now right with it?
>
I should have specified better, my mistake. The PCI ID comment (135a.0811)
is incorrect, the card ID itself is 0x0d80 and the definition used
(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTASHIELD_IS200) is indeed 0x0d80. It's just a cosmetic change
as the rest of the IS range of cards are also being added in this series and their
IDs are all 0x0020 offset from each other (though the IS-300, 0x0da0 is in a
parport_serial patch). Makes no functional difference.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cameron Williams <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > This is a resubmission series for the patch series below. That series
> > was lots of changes sent to lots of maintainers, this series is just for
> > the tty/serial/8250 subsystem.
>
> Your patches here are not threaded at all, was that intentional? Our
> tools will not pick them up properly, and so I would have to do it by
> hand, slowing things down and making me dread handling them. Any reason
> you didn't just use 'git send-email' to send it?
>
This was not intentional, no. I had problems getting git send-email set up,
somthing to do with TLS issues and since Mutt was already set up for general
email, I chose to use that instead for convenience. I can look into getting
git send-email working and re-sending this series as v3 if you want the
series threading properly.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Thanks
Cameron.
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 12:56:31PM +0100, Cameron Williams wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 10:28:33AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:11:09PM +0100, Cameron Williams wrote:
> > > Fix the PCI comment for the IS-200 card
> >
> > "Fix" it how? What was wrong with it, and what is now right with it?
> >
> I should have specified better, my mistake. The PCI ID comment (135a.0811)
> is incorrect, the card ID itself is 0x0d80 and the definition used
> (PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTASHIELD_IS200) is indeed 0x0d80. It's just a cosmetic change
> as the rest of the IS range of cards are also being added in this series and their
> IDs are all 0x0020 offset from each other (though the IS-300, 0x0da0 is in a
> parport_serial patch). Makes no functional difference.
Please put that info in the changelog text when you send your next
version.
> > > Signed-off-by: Cameron Williams <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > This is a resubmission series for the patch series below. That series
> > > was lots of changes sent to lots of maintainers, this series is just for
> > > the tty/serial/8250 subsystem.
> >
> > Your patches here are not threaded at all, was that intentional? Our
> > tools will not pick them up properly, and so I would have to do it by
> > hand, slowing things down and making me dread handling them. Any reason
> > you didn't just use 'git send-email' to send it?
> >
> This was not intentional, no. I had problems getting git send-email set up,
> somthing to do with TLS issues and since Mutt was already set up for general
> email, I chose to use that instead for convenience. I can look into getting
> git send-email working and re-sending this series as v3 if you want the
> series threading properly.
You can use mutt to thread things, you need to do it "by hand" with
mutt, that's what I used to do all the time before git send-email was
created (it's based on some old scripts of mine.) But I would recommend
setting up git send-email if you want to send lots of patches over time.
thanks,
greg k-h