-----Original Message-----
From: Martin J. Bligh [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 11:52 PM
Subject: RE: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with
m ore than 8 CPUs
If you're interested in working on it, I'm very happy to test it ...
(should probably be kept seperate from your other stuff though).
I'll see if I can find someone in our performance team to evaluate
how your existing patch runs on SMP for us ...
M.
Hi Martin,
Would somebody get a chance to try the kirq patch out? If yes, please
let me know, how the patch did on your systems. Did your guys find any
issues with it? I will also appreciate more comments.
Thanks & Regards,
Nitin
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:40:31AM -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> Would somebody get a chance to try the kirq patch out? If yes, please
> let me know, how the patch did on your systems. Did your guys find any
> issues with it? I will also appreciate more comments.
Where/What is the kirq patch?
This is the one we posted (by Nitin) recently. It's a complementary solution to Ingo's random/round-robin interrupt routing, co-existing with it. See Nitin's emails for the patch and details.
Jun
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 2:32 AM
> To: Kamble, Nitin A
> Cc: Linux Kernel
> Subject: Re: KIRQ Balance
>
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:40:31AM -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> > Would somebody get a chance to try the kirq patch out? If yes, please
> > let me know, how the patch did on your systems. Did your guys find any
> > issues with it? I will also appreciate more comments.
>
> Where/What is the kirq patch?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/