2019-09-11 09:44:47

by Sandro Volery

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] Staging: exfat: Avoid use of strcpy

Use strscpy instead of strcpy in exfat_core.c, and add a check
for length that will return already known FFS_INVALIDPATH.

Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sandro Volery <[email protected]>
---
v2: Implement length check and return in one
v1: Original Patch
drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
index da8c58149c35..4c40f1352848 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
@@ -2964,7 +2964,8 @@ s32 resolve_path(struct inode *inode, char *path, struct chain_t *p_dir,
if (strlen(path) >= (MAX_NAME_LENGTH * MAX_CHARSET_SIZE))
return FFS_INVALIDPATH;

- strcpy(name_buf, path);
+ if (strscpy(name_buf, path, sizeof(name_buf)) < 0)
+ return FFS_INVALIDPATH;

nls_cstring_to_uniname(sb, p_uniname, name_buf, &lossy);
if (lossy)
--
2.23.0


2019-09-11 10:09:21

by Dan Carpenter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Staging: exfat: Avoid use of strcpy

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:42:19AM +0200, Sandro Volery wrote:
> Use strscpy instead of strcpy in exfat_core.c, and add a check
> for length that will return already known FFS_INVALIDPATH.
>
> Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Sandro Volery <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2: Implement length check and return in one
> v1: Original Patch
> drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
> index da8c58149c35..4c40f1352848 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
> @@ -2964,7 +2964,8 @@ s32 resolve_path(struct inode *inode, char *path, struct chain_t *p_dir,
> if (strlen(path) >= (MAX_NAME_LENGTH * MAX_CHARSET_SIZE))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Delete this as it is no longer required.

> return FFS_INVALIDPATH;
>
> - strcpy(name_buf, path);
> + if (strscpy(name_buf, path, sizeof(name_buf)) < 0)
> + return FFS_INVALIDPATH;

regards,
dan carpenter

2019-09-11 10:30:24

by Sandro Volery

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Staging: exfat: Avoid use of strcpy



> On 11 Sep 2019, at 12:06, Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:42:19AM +0200, Sandro Volery wrote:
>> Use strscpy instead of strcpy in exfat_core.c, and add a check
>> for length that will return already known FFS_INVALIDPATH.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Sandro Volery <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> v2: Implement length check and return in one
>> v1: Original Patch
>> drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
>> index da8c58149c35..4c40f1352848 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
>> @@ -2964,7 +2964,8 @@ s32 resolve_path(struct inode *inode, char *path, struct chain_t *p_dir,
>> if (strlen(path) >= (MAX_NAME_LENGTH * MAX_CHARSET_SIZE))
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Delete this as it is no longer required.
>

Yep, saw it from Rasmus response too just now.. Dumb mistake.
Will fix this this afternoon.

Sandro V

>> return FFS_INVALIDPATH;
>>
>> - strcpy(name_buf, path);
>> + if (strscpy(name_buf, path, sizeof(name_buf)) < 0)
>> + return FFS_INVALIDPATH;
>


2019-09-11 10:51:44

by Dan Carpenter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Staging: exfat: Avoid use of strcpy

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:24:23PM +0200, Sandro Volery wrote:
>
>
> > On 11 Sep 2019, at 12:06, Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:42:19AM +0200, Sandro Volery wrote:
> >> Use strscpy instead of strcpy in exfat_core.c, and add a check
> >> for length that will return already known FFS_INVALIDPATH.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sandro Volery <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> v2: Implement length check and return in one
> >> v1: Original Patch
> >> drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c | 3 ++-
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
> >> index da8c58149c35..4c40f1352848 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
> >> @@ -2964,7 +2964,8 @@ s32 resolve_path(struct inode *inode, char *path, struct chain_t *p_dir,
> >> if (strlen(path) >= (MAX_NAME_LENGTH * MAX_CHARSET_SIZE))
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Delete this as it is no longer required.
> >
>
> Yep, saw it from Rasmus response too just now.. Dumb mistake.
> Will fix this this afternoon.
>

Or you could send it tomorrow. There is no rush.

regards,
dan carpenter