> On Nov 19, 2017, at 5:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:50:23PM -0600, Tom Gall wrote:
>> At Linaro we’ve been putting effort into regularly running kernel tests over
>> arm, arm64 and x86_64 targets. On those targets we’re running mainline, -next,
>> 4.4, and 4.9 kernels and yes we are adding to this list as the hardware
>> capacity grows.
>>
>> For test buckets we’re using just LTP, kselftest and libhugetlbfs and
>> like kernels we will add to this list.
>
> I'm sorry, I don't understand this sentance.
I was just saying that we intend to add more test buckets and more kernels.
For instance 4.13-rc just was added to the mix.
For test buckets, I’m currently dorking around with some make check targets
for a few interesting packages.
>
>> With the 4.14 cycle being a little ‘different’ in so much as the goal to
>> have it be an LTS kernel I think it’s important to take a look at some
>> 4.14 test results.
>>
>> Grab a beverage, this is a bit of a long post. But quick summery 4.14 as
>> released looks just as good as 4.13, for the test buckets I named above.
>
> Thanks for doing this testing and letting us know.
>
> greg k-h
From 1584602123877125059@xxx Mon Nov 20 16:12:27 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1584318260606186478
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread