2019-11-20 15:29:32

by Srinivas Neeli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] can: xilinx_can: Bug fixes on can driver

This patch series does the following:
-skip printing error message on deferred probe
-Fix usage of skb memory

Srinivas Neeli (1):
can: xilinx_can: Fix usage of skb memory

Venkatesh Yadav Abbarapu (1):
can: xilinx_can: skip error message on deferred probe

drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--
2.7.4



2019-11-20 15:32:51

by Marc Kleine-Budde

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] can: xilinx_can: Bug fixes on can driver

On 11/20/19 1:11 PM, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
> This patch series does the following:
> -skip printing error message on deferred probe
> -Fix usage of skb memory

BTW: I'm looking for an official Maintainer for the xlinx_can driver.

The Maintainer will get an entry in the MAINTAINERS file, should test
new patches and give Reviewed-bys.

Is there a volunteer?

regards,
Marc

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |


Attachments:
signature.asc (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2019-11-20 16:19:56

by Srinivas Neeli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] can: xilinx_can: Fix usage of skb memory

As per linux can framework, driver not allowed to touch the skb memory
after can_put_echo_skb() call.
This patch fixes the same.
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg02199.html

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
index c5f05b994435..536b0f8272f6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
@@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ struct xcan_devtype_data {
* @bus_clk: Pointer to struct clk
* @can_clk: Pointer to struct clk
* @devtype: Device type specific constants
+ * @cfd: Variable to struct canfd_frame
+ * @is_canfd: For checking canfd or not
*/
struct xcan_priv {
struct can_priv can;
@@ -208,6 +210,8 @@ struct xcan_priv {
struct clk *bus_clk;
struct clk *can_clk;
struct xcan_devtype_data devtype;
+ struct canfd_frame cfd;
+ bool is_canfd;
};

/* CAN Bittiming constants as per Xilinx CAN specs */
@@ -543,14 +547,13 @@ static int xcan_do_set_mode(struct net_device *ndev, enum can_mode mode)
/**
* xcan_write_frame - Write a frame to HW
* @priv: Driver private data structure
- * @skb: sk_buff pointer that contains data to be Txed
+ * @cf: canfd_frame pointer that contains data to be Txed
* @frame_offset: Register offset to write the frame to
*/
-static void xcan_write_frame(struct xcan_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
+static void xcan_write_frame(struct xcan_priv *priv, struct canfd_frame *cf,
int frame_offset)
{
u32 id, dlc, data[2] = {0, 0};
- struct canfd_frame *cf = (struct canfd_frame *)skb->data;
u32 ramoff, dwindex = 0, i;

/* Watch carefully on the bit sequence */
@@ -581,7 +584,7 @@ static void xcan_write_frame(struct xcan_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
}

dlc = can_len2dlc(cf->len) << XCAN_DLCR_DLC_SHIFT;
- if (can_is_canfd_skb(skb)) {
+ if (priv->is_canfd) {
if (cf->flags & CANFD_BRS)
dlc |= XCAN_DLCR_BRS_MASK;
dlc |= XCAN_DLCR_EDL_MASK;
@@ -633,6 +636,9 @@ static int xcan_start_xmit_fifo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)
struct xcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
unsigned long flags;

+ priv->cfd = *((struct canfd_frame *)skb->data);
+ priv->is_canfd = can_is_canfd_skb(skb);
+
/* Check if the TX buffer is full */
if (unlikely(priv->read_reg(priv, XCAN_SR_OFFSET) &
XCAN_SR_TXFLL_MASK))
@@ -644,7 +650,7 @@ static int xcan_start_xmit_fifo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)

priv->tx_head++;

- xcan_write_frame(priv, skb, XCAN_TXFIFO_OFFSET);
+ xcan_write_frame(priv, &priv->cfd, XCAN_TXFIFO_OFFSET);

/* Clear TX-FIFO-empty interrupt for xcan_tx_interrupt() */
if (priv->tx_max > 1)
@@ -671,6 +677,9 @@ static int xcan_start_xmit_mailbox(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)
struct xcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
unsigned long flags;

+ priv->cfd = *((struct canfd_frame *)skb->data);
+ priv->is_canfd = can_is_canfd_skb(skb);
+
if (unlikely(priv->read_reg(priv, XCAN_TRR_OFFSET) &
BIT(XCAN_TX_MAILBOX_IDX)))
return -ENOSPC;
@@ -681,7 +690,7 @@ static int xcan_start_xmit_mailbox(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)

priv->tx_head++;

- xcan_write_frame(priv, skb,
+ xcan_write_frame(priv, &priv->cfd,
XCAN_TXMSG_FRAME_OFFSET(XCAN_TX_MAILBOX_IDX));

/* Mark buffer as ready for transmit */
--
2.7.4


Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] can: xilinx_can: Bug fixes on can driver

Hi Marc,

>
> On 11/20/19 1:11 PM, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
> > This patch series does the following:
> > -skip printing error message on deferred probe -Fix usage of skb
> > memory
>
> BTW: I'm looking for an official Maintainer for the xlinx_can driver.
>
> The Maintainer will get an entry in the MAINTAINERS file, should test new
> patches and give Reviewed-bys.
>
> Is there a volunteer?

Sure will volunteer the maintainership, will send the maintainer fragment patch...

Regards,
Kedar.
>
> regards,
> Marc
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
> Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
> Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |