>When a structure containing an RCU callback rhp is (incorrectly) freed
>and reallocated after rhp is passed to call_rcu(), it is not unusual for
>rhp->func to be set to NULL. This defeats the debugging prints used by
>__call_rcu_common() in kernels built with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=y,
>which expect to identify the offending code using the identity of this
>function.
>
>And in kernels build without CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=y, things
>are even worse, as can be seen from this splat:
>
>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0
>... ...
>PC is at 0x0
>LR is at rcu_do_batch+0x1c0/0x3b8
>... ...
> (rcu_do_batch) from (rcu_core+0x1d4/0x284)
> (rcu_core) from (__do_softirq+0x24c/0x344)
> (__do_softirq) from (__irq_exit_rcu+0x64/0x108)
> (__irq_exit_rcu) from (irq_exit+0x8/0x10)
> (irq_exit) from (__handle_domain_irq+0x74/0x9c)
> (__handle_domain_irq) from (gic_handle_irq+0x8c/0x98)
> (gic_handle_irq) from (__irq_svc+0x5c/0x94)
> (__irq_svc) from (arch_cpu_idle+0x20/0x3c)
> (arch_cpu_idle) from (default_idle_call+0x4c/0x78)
> (default_idle_call) from (do_idle+0xf8/0x150)
> (do_idle) from (cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x20)
> (cpu_startup_entry) from (0xc01530)
>
>This commit therefore adds calls to mem_dump_obj(rhp) to output some
>information, for example:
>
> slab kmalloc-256 start ffff410c45019900 pointer offset 0 size 256
>
>This provides the rough size of the memory block and the offset of the
>rcu_head structure, which as least provides at least a few clues to help
>locate the problem. If the problem is reproducible, additional slab
>debugging can be enabled, for example, CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y, which can
>provide significantly more information.
>
>Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <[email protected]>
>Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
>---
> kernel/rcu/rcu.h | 7 +++++++
> kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 1 +
> kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 1 +
> kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 1 +
> kernel/rcu/tiny.c | 1 +
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
>v1 --> v2:
>1. Remove condition "(unsigned long)rhp->func & 0x3", it have problems on x86.
>2. Paul E. McKenney helped me update the commit message, thanks.
>
Hi, Zhen Lei
Maybe the following scenarios should be considered:
CPU 0
tasks context
spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock)
Interrupt
RCU softirq
rcu_do_batch
mem_dump_obj
vmalloc_dump_obj
spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock) <-- deadlock
Thanks
Zqiang
>diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
>index 65704cbc9df7b3d..32ab45fabf8eebf 100644
>--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
>+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
>@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #ifndef __LINUX_RCU_H
> #define __LINUX_RCU_H
>
>+#include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <trace/events/rcu.h>
>
> /*
>@@ -211,6 +212,12 @@ static inline void debug_rcu_head_unqueue(struct rcu_head *head)
> }
> #endif /* #else !CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD */
>
>+static inline void debug_rcu_head_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp)
>+{
>+ if (unlikely(!rhp->func))
>+ mem_dump_obj(rhp);
>+}
>+
> extern int rcu_cpu_stall_suppress_at_boot;
>
> static inline bool rcu_stall_is_suppressed_at_boot(void)
>diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
>index 33adafdad261389..5e7f336baa06ae0 100644
>--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
>+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
>@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ void srcu_drive_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
> while (lh) {
> rhp = lh;
> lh = lh->next;
>+ debug_rcu_head_callback(rhp);
> local_bh_disable();
> rhp->func(rhp);
> local_bh_enable();
>diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
>index ca4b5dcec675bac..294972e66b31863 100644
>--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
>+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
>@@ -1631,6 +1631,7 @@ static void srcu_invoke_callbacks(struct work_struct *work)
> rhp = rcu_cblist_dequeue(&ready_cbs);
> for (; rhp != NULL; rhp = rcu_cblist_dequeue(&ready_cbs)) {
> debug_rcu_head_unqueue(rhp);
>+ debug_rcu_head_callback(rhp);
> local_bh_disable();
> rhp->func(rhp);
> local_bh_enable();
>diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
>index b0b885e071fa8dc..b7f8c67c586cdc4 100644
>--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
>+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
>@@ -478,6 +478,7 @@ static void rcu_tasks_invoke_cbs(struct rcu_tasks *rtp, struct rcu_tasks_percpu
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
> len = rcl.len;
> for (rhp = rcu_cblist_dequeue(&rcl); rhp; rhp = rcu_cblist_dequeue(&rcl)) {
>+ debug_rcu_head_callback(rhp);
> local_bh_disable();
> rhp->func(rhp);
> local_bh_enable();
>diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
>index bb8f7d270f01747..56e9a5d91d97ec5 100644
>--- a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
>+++ b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
>@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ static inline bool rcu_reclaim_tiny(struct rcu_head *head)
>
> trace_rcu_invoke_callback("", head);
> f = head->func;
>+ debug_rcu_head_callback(head);
> WRITE_ONCE(head->func, (rcu_callback_t)0L);
> f(head);
> rcu_lock_release(&rcu_callback_map);
>diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>index 15aaff3203bf2d0..ed93ddb8203d42c 100644
>--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>@@ -2088,6 +2088,7 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> trace_rcu_invoke_callback(rcu_state.name, rhp);
>
> f = rhp->func;
>+ debug_rcu_head_callback(rhp);
> WRITE_ONCE(rhp->func, (rcu_callback_t)0L);
> f(rhp);
>
>--
>2.25.1