Hi Alan
I have sent this patch to Gerd and I did not get any reply from him, so...
The bttv drivers are/were filling up my /var/log/messages file with the
following output
Oct 20 04:03:01 localhost kernel: bttv0: amux: mode=-1 audio=1 signal=no
mux=4/1 irq=yes
Oct 20 04:03:01 localhost kernel: bttv0: amux: mode=-1 audio=1 signal=yes
mux=1/1 irq=yes
Oct 20 04:03:08 localhost kernel: bttv0: amux: mode=-1 audio=1 signal=no
mux=4/1 irq=yes
(Which seems to repeat three times a second for three seconds and waits 7
second before printing the message again)
The following patch quites them down.
Thanx
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Bongani wrote:
Hi,
> Hi Alan
>
> I have sent this patch to Gerd and I did not get any reply from him, so...
> The bttv drivers are/were filling up my /var/log/messages file with the
> following output
I had sent a quite similar patch to Gerd and the v4l list (where I am
not subscribed) on Oct 6th. The only thing I got was the "maintainer
action required" reply from the list bot. As the archive is for
subsribers only I cannot say if it ever reached the list.
Alan please include this patch in -ac2.
To Suse-folks: what happend to gerd ? I had seen lots of questions
regarding v4l2 on this list but no answers.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/
> To Suse-folks: what happend to gerd ? I had seen lots of questions
> regarding v4l2 on this list but no answers.
I read lkml very briefly. Better use the video4linux list, that highly
increases the chance I see it.
Gerd
PS: I have bttv updates in the queue anyway (also available from
http://bytesex.org/patches/2.5/). There are v4l2 patches too.
--
You can't please everybody. And usually if you _try_ to please
everybody, the end result is one big mess.
-- Linus Torvalds, 2002-04-20