This changeset is to fix reiserfs problems that arose after applying one of
Al Viro's cleanup. This changeset simply removes offending part.
You can use bk receive to get it.
diffstat:
journal.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
patch:
# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux kernel tree
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
# This patch includes the following deltas:
# ChangeSet 1.586 -> 1.587
# fs/reiserfs/journal.c 1.30 -> 1.31
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 02/04/05 [email protected] 1.587
# journal.c:
# Al Viro's cleanup broke reiserfs in 2.5.6-pre3, revert the change.
# --------------------------------------------
#
diff -Nru a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
--- a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c Fri Apr 5 14:13:49 2002
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c Fri Apr 5 14:13:49 2002
@@ -98,21 +98,6 @@
static int release_journal_dev( struct super_block *super,
struct reiserfs_journal *journal );
-static inline struct buffer_head *journ_get_hash_table(struct super_block *s, int block)
-{
- return __get_hash_table(SB_JOURNAL(s)->j_dev_bd, block, s->s_blocksize);
-}
-
-static inline struct buffer_head *journ_getblk(struct super_block *s, int block)
-{
- return __getblk(SB_JOURNAL(s)->j_dev_bd, block, s->s_blocksize);
-}
-
-static inline struct buffer_head *journ_bread(struct super_block *s, int block)
-{
- return __bread(SB_JOURNAL(s)->j_dev_bd, block, s->s_blocksize);
-}
-
static void init_journal_hash(struct super_block *p_s_sb) {
memset(SB_JOURNAL(p_s_sb)->j_hash_table, 0, JOURNAL_HASH_SIZE * sizeof(struct reiserfs_journal_cnode *)) ;
}
@@ -705,7 +690,7 @@
count = 0 ;
for (i = 0 ; atomic_read(&(jl->j_commit_left)) > 1 && i < (jl->j_len + 1) ; i++) { /* everything but commit_bh */
bn = SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(s) + (jl->j_start+i) % SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(s);
- tbh = journ_get_hash_table(s, bn) ;
+ tbh = get_hash_table(SB_JOURNAL_DEV(s), bn, s->s_blocksize) ;
/* kill this sanity check */
if (count > (orig_commit_left + 2)) {
@@ -734,7 +719,7 @@
for (i = 0 ; atomic_read(&(jl->j_commit_left)) > 1 &&
i < (jl->j_len + 1) ; i++) { /* everything but commit_bh */
bn = SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(s) + (jl->j_start + i) % SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(s) ;
- tbh = journ_get_hash_table(s, bn) ;
+ tbh = get_hash_table(SB_JOURNAL_DEV(s), bn, s->s_blocksize) ;
wait_on_buffer(tbh) ;
if (!buffer_uptodate(tbh)) {
@@ -1425,8 +1410,9 @@
offset = d_bh->b_blocknr - SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) ;
/* ok, we have a journal description block, lets see if the transaction was valid */
- c_bh = journ_bread(p_s_sb, SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) +
- ((offset + le32_to_cpu(desc->j_len) + 1) % SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(p_s_sb))) ;
+ c_bh = bread(SB_JOURNAL_DEV(p_s_sb), SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) +
+ ((offset + le32_to_cpu(desc->j_len) + 1) % SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(p_s_sb)),
+ p_s_sb->s_blocksize) ;
if (!c_bh)
return 0 ;
commit = (struct reiserfs_journal_commit *)c_bh->b_data ;
@@ -1480,7 +1466,7 @@
unsigned long trans_offset ;
int i;
- d_bh = journ_bread(p_s_sb, cur_dblock) ;
+ d_bh = bread(SB_JOURNAL_DEV(p_s_sb), cur_dblock, p_s_sb->s_blocksize) ;
if (!d_bh)
return 1 ;
desc = (struct reiserfs_journal_desc *)d_bh->b_data ;
@@ -1504,9 +1490,9 @@
brelse(d_bh) ;
return 1 ;
}
- c_bh = journ_bread(p_s_sb, SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) +
+ c_bh = bread(SB_JOURNAL_DEV(p_s_sb), SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) +
((trans_offset + le32_to_cpu(desc->j_len) + 1) %
- SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(p_s_sb))) ;
+ SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(p_s_sb)), p_s_sb->s_blocksize) ;
if (!c_bh) {
brelse(d_bh) ;
return 1 ;
@@ -1535,7 +1521,7 @@
}
/* get all the buffer heads */
for(i = 0 ; i < le32_to_cpu(desc->j_len) ; i++) {
- log_blocks[i] = journ_getblk(p_s_sb, SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) + (trans_offset + 1 + i) % SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(p_s_sb));
+ log_blocks[i] = getblk(SB_JOURNAL_DEV(p_s_sb), SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) + (trans_offset + 1 + i) % SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(p_s_sb), p_s_sb->s_blocksize);
if (i < JOURNAL_TRANS_HALF) {
real_blocks[i] = sb_getblk(p_s_sb, le32_to_cpu(desc->j_realblock[i])) ;
} else {
@@ -1675,9 +1661,10 @@
** is the first unflushed, and if that transaction is not valid,
** replay is done
*/
- SB_JOURNAL(p_s_sb)->j_header_bh = journ_bread(p_s_sb,
+ SB_JOURNAL(p_s_sb)->j_header_bh = bread (SB_JOURNAL_DEV(p_s_sb),
SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) +
- SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(p_s_sb));
+ SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(p_s_sb),
+ p_s_sb->s_blocksize) ;
if (!SB_JOURNAL(p_s_sb)->j_header_bh) {
return 1 ;
}
@@ -1698,7 +1685,7 @@
** there is nothing more we can do, and it makes no sense to read
** through the whole log.
*/
- d_bh = journ_bread(p_s_sb, SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) + le32_to_cpu(jh->j_first_unflushed_offset)) ;
+ d_bh = bread(SB_JOURNAL_DEV(p_s_sb), SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) + le32_to_cpu(jh->j_first_unflushed_offset), p_s_sb->s_blocksize) ;
ret = journal_transaction_is_valid(p_s_sb, d_bh, NULL, NULL) ;
if (!ret) {
continue_replay = 0 ;
@@ -2045,8 +2032,9 @@
rs = SB_DISK_SUPER_BLOCK(p_s_sb);
/* read journal header */
- bhjh = journ_bread(p_s_sb,
- SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) + SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(p_s_sb));
+ bhjh = bread (SB_JOURNAL_DEV(p_s_sb),
+ SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) + SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(p_s_sb),
+ SB_BLOCKSIZE(p_s_sb));
if (!bhjh) {
printk("sh-459: unable to read journal header\n") ;
return 1 ;
@@ -2984,7 +2972,7 @@
rs = SB_DISK_SUPER_BLOCK(p_s_sb) ;
/* setup description block */
- d_bh = journ_getblk(p_s_sb, SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) + SB_JOURNAL(p_s_sb)->j_start) ;
+ d_bh = getblk(SB_JOURNAL_DEV(p_s_sb), SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) + SB_JOURNAL(p_s_sb)->j_start, p_s_sb->s_blocksize) ;
mark_buffer_uptodate(d_bh, 1) ;
desc = (struct reiserfs_journal_desc *)(d_bh)->b_data ;
memset(desc, 0, sizeof(struct reiserfs_journal_desc)) ;
@@ -2992,8 +2980,9 @@
desc->j_trans_id = cpu_to_le32(SB_JOURNAL(p_s_sb)->j_trans_id) ;
/* setup commit block. Don't write (keep it clean too) this one until after everyone else is written */
- c_bh = journ_getblk(p_s_sb, SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) +
- ((SB_JOURNAL(p_s_sb)->j_start + SB_JOURNAL(p_s_sb)->j_len + 1) % SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(p_s_sb))) ;
+ c_bh = getblk(SB_JOURNAL_DEV(p_s_sb), SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) +
+ ((SB_JOURNAL(p_s_sb)->j_start + SB_JOURNAL(p_s_sb)->j_len + 1) % SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(p_s_sb)),
+ p_s_sb->s_blocksize) ;
commit = (struct reiserfs_journal_commit *)c_bh->b_data ;
memset(commit, 0, sizeof(struct reiserfs_journal_commit)) ;
commit->j_trans_id = cpu_to_le32(SB_JOURNAL(p_s_sb)->j_trans_id) ;
@@ -3083,8 +3072,9 @@
/* copy all the real blocks into log area. dirty log blocks */
if (test_bit(BH_JDirty, &cn->bh->b_state)) {
struct buffer_head *tmp_bh ;
- tmp_bh = journ_getblk(p_s_sb, SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) +
- ((cur_write_start + jindex) % SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(p_s_sb))) ;
+ tmp_bh = getblk(SB_JOURNAL_DEV(p_s_sb), SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(p_s_sb) +
+ ((cur_write_start + jindex) % SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(p_s_sb)),
+ p_s_sb->s_blocksize) ;
mark_buffer_uptodate(tmp_bh, 1) ;
memcpy(tmp_bh->b_data, cn->bh->b_data, cn->bh->b_size) ;
jindex++ ;
BK changeset:
This BitKeeper patch contains the following changesets:
1.587
## Wrapped with gzip_uu ##
begin 664 bkpatch2227
M'XL(`#RWK3P``[56:V^;2!3][/D55ZI6=92`9QB>KASEJ=ULHB9*E'[8JD(\
MQ@$;@\4,2;ORC]\9L-DT@MB[<K&M*^!R..?<,R-_@$?.RO'@J60L1Q_@CX*+
M\2#(G\(@C_4\6##^@^M1L9#W[HM"WALEQ8*-ZOY1./=?BG(^*EDJ4:B6I7GU
M73-T"\GVNT!$"3RSDH\'1*?M%?%CR<:#^\O?'V].[Q&:3.`\D2]D#TS`9()$
M43X'6<Q/`I%D1:Z+,LCY@HE`L5BUK2L#8T-^+.)0;-DK8F/3644D)B0P"8NQ
M8;JVB6J>)QUZWB*9V,*>B;&]PH[C>N@"B&ZY#F!CA,T1MH#0L4G&E!QB<XPQ
M]`+#(0$-HS/8KY!S%,&LJ,H\R/1H+$\`3C/XDI;%1PY1QH*\6D)8%G,&S32F
M'-(<Y"QT6UN6C![)ZW(8`D3"(*K?KJ-K<#W/0G?_C@!I__%`"`<8'<-2#;=;
MZY2/-IQ&K897NBU,C16EU/%6D>>X4QNS"$>!$UI&O\_OH3;#),18F2Z5^E3(
M.MM5X'X-<10'SVQVPBO.])B]3Y82S_*PM;()=JPZ>92\#1XQM@?/H*!1^DNB
MMY>L-<.X!:U\J;\R/'?=<_D?*;P@F`"1]CG8!8*NFB*7"8@P@0D\,>$G`4]\
M$809&SZ<^7_>/MY_/KWQ+RZ_#/G!$83Y$7#MF/MA5D1SGO[-#N"3Q*-.C5<7
M@#T@$M-PP4!7LGI`:\S(KR'#D@7Q6Z2ESWT>2CAY_?;SQ=7#=7N;<.&?W=R>
M7V^:X!`-!C`<%M,IE_OI(62,&KXH_&A9#6/&(^UXYF<LEXU`#N"W#LR'J[\N
M-W#RI0JO.>L2XE+ES;H"Q+O(B*K2CVN@HWYD"]>NK^M>#5+@WAI<52EPJPO]
M/*G;0-%-W++B:=WT-?TF*:N<A-F\E_1NK&%8+V*_'2R1OW3[!+NI*^:VTS!O
M:DUC#;!Y5F4ED7ZS\I7YT"=$0;JX@935D+[*`[KT_42P[>OUV%$K6\(V57F\
M4\YV\_7U`IDE2O(T+65?E4^SBB<L7EO^3@CD'EZO9UDWZQG"9+:#93W^=/'<
M[F(#53_W4WH50\^ME].ZM@9NB>;.S#J"PT50BC[/0%'RK-HTS[-KT]8K?#^<
MFEWP'6:]O.7FN)>]D6+75OID=3:A`+%8[EME<PR':E=]*5/!6GVS-(_9]YV%
=-$>/G/;?>Y0P>;5:3#PSM!W;H.@?"U[I6D,,````
`
end
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
> This changeset is to fix reiserfs problems that arose after applying one of
> Al Viro's cleanup. This changeset simply removes offending part.
Hans, it's already fixed by Oleg's patch.
hey all! with the risk of being annoying i post again this message because
i am not sure the last i did found its way to the list due to some unknown
delays in majordomo`s subscribing procedure. so, here it is my problem in
detail:
i experience a weird IDT issue on kernels 2.4.x. what i want to do
is finding the address of a certain IDT gate but when i try to read memory
from ring0 at that location it segfaults. the code is in assembler.
.bss
idtr:
.double
.text
get_gate:
movl $0x80, %eax
sidt idtr
movl idtr+2, %ebx
leal (%ebx, %eax, 8), %ebx
movw (%ebx), %cx <- segfault
as far as i know, i retrieve the correct IDT base, but after the leal
instruction, %ebx has some unusual value. i suspect that either leal
instruction is misimplemented in gcc/as compilers or the kernel doesn`t
give me the right IDT. anyway, it could also be some obscure coding error
but i strongly doubt it.
i cannot find out why is this happening.. i would apreciate any help that i
can get.
best regards,
halfdead
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 11:07, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
> >
> > This changeset is to fix reiserfs problems that arose after applying one of
> > Al Viro's cleanup. This changeset simply removes offending part.
>
> Hans, it's already fixed by Oleg's patch.
>
Correct. Hans, numerous people have explained that reversing this patch
fixes nothing.
-chris