I have ported ide-patch to 2.2.18-17 and I'm now backporting
2.4.0 changes. New VIA, SLC, OSB4 drivers and MANY other things
are already there.I hope that final 2.2.18-ide-patch will have
IDE functionality equal to this in 2.4.0-test10...
Here is a snapshot (it's not thoroughly audited and tested):
http://republika.pl/bkz/ide.2.2.18-17.all.20001027.patch.bz2
And please cut that bullshit about ide-patch 2.2.x being unmantained.
I don't use 2.2.x kernels anymore so I don't do ide-patches for pre
kernels. But there will be patches for stable 2.2.x. (Although it's
a real pain - I hate doing backporting instead of new stuff).
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<[email protected]>
Hi Bart,
The point is that I have stopped with the backport because of 2.4.0 push,
and I was waiting on you to pick it up again.
/pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/bkz/ide.2.2.18-17.all.20001027.patch.bz2
There you go Bart.
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick
The Linux ATA/IDE guy
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>...
> I don't use 2.2.x kernels anymore so I don't do ide-patches for pre
> kernels. But there will be patches for stable 2.2.x. (Although it's
> a real pain - I hate doing backporting instead of new stuff).
I have modified your patch to apply cleanly against 2.2.18pre18. You can
find this patch at
http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/ide.2.2.18pre18.adrian.patch.bz2
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> I have ported ide-patch to 2.2.18-17 and I'm now backporting
> 2.4.0 changes. New VIA, SLC, OSB4 drivers and MANY other things
> are already there.I hope that final 2.2.18-ide-patch will have
> IDE functionality equal to this in 2.4.0-test10...
>
> Here is a snapshot (it's not thoroughly audited and tested):
> http://republika.pl/bkz/ide.2.2.18-17.all.20001027.patch.bz2
>
> And please cut that bullshit about ide-patch 2.2.x being unmantained.
> I don't use 2.2.x kernels anymore so I don't do ide-patches for pre
> kernels. But there will be patches for stable 2.2.x. (Although it's
> a real pain - I hate doing backporting instead of new stuff).
Can you say something about how well it patches (and behaves) with
the corresponding RAID patch, e.g.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.18-A2
--
Eyal Lebedinsky ([email protected])
bkz, any chance of a backport of this backport to 2.2.17?
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> The point is that I have stopped with the backport because of 2.4.0 push,
> and I was waiting on you to pick it up again.
>
> /pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/bkz/ide.2.2.18-17.all.20001027.patch.bz2
>
> There you go Bart.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andre Hedrick
> The Linux ATA/IDE guy
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:12:32AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> >...
> > I don't use 2.2.x kernels anymore so I don't do ide-patches for pre
> > kernels. But there will be patches for stable 2.2.x. (Although it's
> > a real pain - I hate doing backporting instead of new stuff).
>
> I have modified your patch to apply cleanly against 2.2.18pre18. You can
> find this patch at
>
> http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/ide.2.2.18pre18.adrian.patch.bz2
And I in turn have done the same for 2.2.18pre21
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~fifield/patches/ide.2.2.18pre21.jamie.patch.bz2
Compiled and used it on a couple different chipsets. Seems to work for me.
--
Jamie Fifield
<[email protected]>