Hi!
I just finished sending up the last large change I like to send to
Linus for the framebuffer changes. Since I can't test all the
possible hardware there I like to ask people to test the BK
tree out. Once I have positive reports I like to merge it with Linus BK
tree. Thank you.
http://fbdev.bkbits.net/fbdev-2.5
. ---
|o_o |
|:_/ | Give Micro$oft the Bird!!!!
// \ \ Use Linux!!!!
(| | )
/'_ _/`\
___)=(___/
>>>>> "James" == James Simmons <[email protected]> writes:
James> Hi!
James> I just finished sending up the last large change I like to
James> send to Linus for the framebuffer changes. Since I can't test
James> all the possible hardware there I like to ask people to test
James> the BK tree out. Once I have positive reports I like to merge
James> it with Linus BK tree. Thank you.
James> http://fbdev.bkbits.net/fbdev-2.5
ARGH
If you want people to test out the patches, posting a bitkeeper only
URL is totally unreasonable!
This is exactly what caused the long flame on linux-kernel the other
day ;-(
Jes
> James> http://fbdev.bkbits.net/fbdev-2.5
>
> ARGH
>
> If you want people to test out the patches, posting a bitkeeper only
> URL is totally unreasonable!
>
> This is exactly what caused the long flame on linux-kernel the other
> day ;-(
:-(
Here is a standard diff patch against 2.5.9.
http://www.transvirtual.com/~jsimmons/new_fbdev.diff.gz
Please test it out. Patches welcomed.