I'm running Kernel 2.4.17 in a classic Pentium 75MHz and I have problems
with it (with 2.2 series it works fine). After a while from boot I get lot
of kernel oops like this (if I have big load oops's will come more often):
--- 8< ---
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at
virtual address 00001200
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: printing eip:
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: 00001200
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: *pde = 00000000
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: Oops: 0000
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: CPU: 0
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: EIP: 0010:[<00001200>] Not tainted
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: EFLAGS: 00013202
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: eax: 00000001 ebx: c024ce60 ecx:
c380b000 edx: 00000012
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: esi: 00000012 edi: 00000018 ebp:
00000361 esp: c11f7f28
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: Process kswapd (pid: 4,
stackpage=c11f7000)
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: Stack: c109eec0 c0126983 c024ce60
00000197 c11f6000 00000051 000001d0 c01fd4c8
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: c0265ee0 c11e35a0 c10c7590
00000000 00000020 000001d0 00000006 00002946
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: c0126af6 00000006 0000000e
c01fd4c8 00000006 000001d0 c01fd4c8 00000000
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: Call Trace: [shrink_cache+691/752]
[shrink_caches+86/128] [try_to_free_pages+48
/80] [kswapd_balance_pgdat+68/144] [kswapd_balance+22/48]
Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: [kswapd+161/192] [kswapd+0/192]
[kernel_thread+43/64]
--- 8< ---
Isn't 2.4 series compatible with Pentium Classic?
Looks like memory corruption...
Mind running memtest86 ?
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Tony Glader wrote:
>
> I'm running Kernel 2.4.17 in a classic Pentium 75MHz and I have problems
> with it (with 2.2 series it works fine). After a while from boot I get lot
> of kernel oops like this (if I have big load oops's will come more often):
>
> --- 8< ---
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at
> virtual address 00001200
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: printing eip:
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: 00001200
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: *pde = 00000000
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: Oops: 0000
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: CPU: 0
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: EIP: 0010:[<00001200>] Not tainted
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: EFLAGS: 00013202
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: eax: 00000001 ebx: c024ce60 ecx:
> c380b000 edx: 00000012
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: esi: 00000012 edi: 00000018 ebp:
> 00000361 esp: c11f7f28
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: Process kswapd (pid: 4,
> stackpage=c11f7000)
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: Stack: c109eec0 c0126983 c024ce60
> 00000197 c11f6000 00000051 000001d0 c01fd4c8
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: c0265ee0 c11e35a0 c10c7590
> 00000000 00000020 000001d0 00000006 00002946
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: c0126af6 00000006 0000000e
> c01fd4c8 00000006 000001d0 c01fd4c8 00000000
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: Call Trace: [shrink_cache+691/752]
> [shrink_caches+86/128] [try_to_free_pages+48
> /80] [kswapd_balance_pgdat+68/144] [kswapd_balance+22/48]
> Jan 9 17:23:34 firewall kernel: [kswapd+161/192] [kswapd+0/192]
> [kernel_thread+43/64]
>
> --- 8< ---
>
> Isn't 2.4 series compatible with Pentium Classic?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Looks like memory corruption...
Hardware-problem was my first idea also. So I changed memory - didn't
help, changed processor - didn't help, changed mainboard - didn't help,
changed even harddisk (because seems that the problem is with ide i/o -
high harddisk i/o will cause lot of oopses) - didn't help.
> Mind running memtest86 ?
I ran. It didn't found any errors.