Hey,
I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as
described below.
(For those in favor of .lost+found/, raise your hand ;))
--- drivers/net/pcmcia/wavelan_cs.c.orig Sat Feb 10 18:19:13 2001
+++ drivers/net/pcmcia/wavelan_cs.c Sat Feb 10 18:18:01 2001
@@ -4821,5 +4821,7 @@
#endif
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bad_udelay);
+
module_init(init_wavelan_cs);
module_exit(exit_wavelan_cs);
-- dag wieers, <[email protected]>, http://mind.be/ --
Out of swap, out of luck.
> I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as
> described below.
Rejected. It is meant not to be there.
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as
> > described below.
>
> Rejected. It is meant not to be there.
To be more specific ... __bad_udelay() is meant to be an
unresolvable symbol, which is referenced when people call
udelay with a "wrong" timeout.
regards,
Rik
--
Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> Rejected. It is meant not to be there.
>
> To be more specific ... __bad_udelay() is meant to be an
> unresolvable symbol, which is referenced when people call
> udelay with a "wrong" timeout.
Maybe this (and similar situations) could be added to the lkml-FAQ ?
It would have prevented me to post it on lkml ;)
Thanks,
-- dag wieers, <[email protected]>, http://mind.be/ --
Out of swap, out of luck.