2002-01-23 18:48:34

by Jeff Chua

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Which version of glibc?


Should I upgrade to glibc-2.2.5 for linux kernel compilation?

I'm on gcc-2.95.3, glibc-2.1.3

What about gcc?

I'm asking this now as Xfree86 is just release and it's build with glib22.


Thanks,
Jeff
[ [email protected] ]


2002-01-24 12:48:26

by Ketil Froyn

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Which version of glibc?

On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Jeff Chua wrote:

> Should I upgrade to glibc-2.2.5 for linux kernel compilation?
>
> I'm on gcc-2.95.3, glibc-2.1.3

Unless I'm missing something, your version of glibc shouldn't matter.
glibc is not linked to the kernel. Your version of gcc, on the other hand,
is quite important. I guess you're ok with 2.95.3, and if you're not, I'm
sure you'll find out soon enough :)

Ketil

2002-01-25 07:34:38

by Ragnar Hojland Espinosa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Which version of glibc?

On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 10:47:30AM -0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
>
> Should I upgrade to glibc-2.2.5 for linux kernel compilation?
>
> I'm on gcc-2.95.3, glibc-2.1.3
>
> What about gcc?

Follow Ketils advice :)

> I'm asking this now as Xfree86 is just release and it's build with glib22.

Upgrading glibc to 2.2 now is a good idea. 2.1.3 had some sort of
floating point bug, and I'm not all sure it had full support for big files.

--
____/| Ragnar H?jland Freedom - Linux - OpenGL | Brainbench MVP
\ o.O| PGP94C4B2F0D27DE025BE2302C104B78C56 B72F0822 | for Unix Programming
=(_)= "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for | (http://www.brainbench.com)
U chaos and madness await thee at its end."