It's time for the annual question and answer:
Will ETCP
http://www.chem.ucla.edu/~beichuan/etcp/
be appearing in linux kernels any time soon? We have ECN...
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, David L. Nicol wrote:
> It's time for the annual question and answer:
> Will ETCP
>
> http://www.chem.ucla.edu/~beichuan/etcp/
>
> be appearing in linux kernels any time soon? We have ECN...
You may want to ask the people who made that page back in '97.
Rik
--
Executive summary of a recent Microsoft press release:
"we are concerned about the GNU General Public License (GPL)"
http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Mark Hahn wrote:
>
> > Will ETCP
> > http://www.chem.ucla.edu/~beichuan/etcp/
> > be appearing in linux kernels any time soon? We have ECN...
>
> isn't it just a draft? I though ECN was considerably further along...
No, it works -- if you set up a BSD system and apply their patch,
the second image loads fully too -- I did it once, and it worked
just like it is supposed to.
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187
"Mary had a little chainsaw" -- Angus Oblong
Mark Hahn wrote:
>
> > > > Will ETCP
> > > > http://www.chem.ucla.edu/~beichuan/etcp/
> > > > be appearing in linux kernels any time soon? We have ECN...
> > >
> > > isn't it just a draft? I though ECN was considerably further along...
> >
> > No, it works -- if you set up a BSD system and apply their patch,
> > the second image loads fully too -- I did it once, and it worked
> > just like it is supposed to.
>
> that wasn't the question: is it just a draft, or a standard like ECN?
> whether there's working code is orthogonal to it's standardization...
A working implementation (blessed by Christian Huitama) is IMO a defacto
standard.
I inquired of the TCP-IMPL working group about setting something like
ETCP up, to the point of submitting an independent proposal pretty much
describing it, and was referred to the ETCP demonstration.
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187
Cell phones are pretty much what Marconi had in mind, you know?