2002-02-06 08:47:41

by Shawn Starr

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: SHOULD BE: 2.4.18-pre8 + 2.4.18-pre7-ac3 + rmap12c + XFS Results


Sorry 2.4.18-pre7-ac3

:)

On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, J Sloan wrote:

> Great - could you compare and contrast with
> e.g. stock 2.4.17, or even 2.4.18-pre?
>
> Joe
>
> Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> >I'm happy to say that rmap12c has huge preformance improvements over
> >rmap11c with my Pentium 200Mhz w/64MB ram.
> >
> >Some of the differences:
> >
> >rmap11c: slow redrawing of mozilla, mouse hangs, system sluggishness.
> >
> >rmap12c: no slow redrawing UNLESS heavy I/O & swapping is occuring. System
> >is able to handle heavy heavy memory usage (mozilla + evolution +
> >blowup-xfs - fsx-linux.c to test XFS's stability with VM).
> >
> >Also, XFS so far is preforming without file corruption that I can see.
> >
> >a patch will be available for this shortly on my website for those who
> >want XFS + rmap12c.
> >
> >Shawn.
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >the body of a message to [email protected]
> >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
>
>
>