final:
- 2.4.19-rc5 was released as 2.4.19 with no changes.
Summary of changes from v2.4.19-rc4 to v2.4.19-rc5
============================================
<[email protected]> (02/08/01 1.662)
[PATCH] Correct openprom fix
<[email protected]> (02/07/31 1.661)
[PATCH] Add missing check to openprom driver
<[email protected]> (02/08/01 1.663)
[PATCH] disable READA
<[email protected]> (02/08/01 1.664)
Change EXTRAVERSION to -rc5
Hi folks,
I've got billions of undefined symbols during 'make modules_install'.
:
cd /lib/modules/2.4.19; \
mkdir -p pcmcia; \
find kernel -path '*/pcmcia/*' -name '*.o' | xargs -i -r ln -sf ../{} pcmcia
if [ -r System.map ]; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F System.map 2.4.19; fi
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.19/kernel/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.o
depmod: register_sysctl_table_Rab92f33e
depmod: kmalloc_R93d4cfe6
depmod: __generic_copy_to_user_Rd523fdd3
depmod: __generic_copy_from_user_R116166aa
:
Is this due to gcc 2.95.4? Can anybody reproduce this? I'm
running Debian (Sid, i386).
Regards
Harri
PS: After booting 2.4.19 'depmod -a' works as expected, but
'depmod -ae -F /boot/System.map-2.4.19 2.4.19' doesn't. I
would guess its a problem with depmod.
Regards
Harri
Hi,
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> PS: After booting 2.4.19 'depmod -a' works as expected, but
> 'depmod -ae -F /boot/System.map-2.4.19 2.4.19' doesn't. I
> would guess its a problem with depmod.
I'd rather guess the problem is that you didn't make dep after config
changes. Read the FAQ, please.
Thunder
--
.-../../-./..-/-..- .-./..-/.-.././.../.-.-.-
Hi T.
Thunder from the hill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
>>PS: After booting 2.4.19 'depmod -a' works as expected, but
>> 'depmod -ae -F /boot/System.map-2.4.19 2.4.19' doesn't. I
>> would guess its a problem with depmod.
>
>
> I'd rather guess the problem is that you didn't make dep after config
> changes. Read the FAQ, please.
Of course 'make dep' was in. But Debian includes modutils 2.4.15. After
upgrading to 2.4.19 the problem is gone. Debian is out of date :-(.
Maybe it would help to update Documentation/Changes to list the new
modutils, too?
Regards
Harri
Hello Marcelo , Ummmm . Haven't the tarballs usuaully been
archived as 'linux/' instead of 'linux-2.4.19/' ?
I am also finding atm driver files touched but no obvious entries
in the ChangeLog . ie: linux-2.4.19/drivers/atm/fore200e.c
touched '2002-08-02 20:39' by tar archive time stamp .
The below are the only entries in the ChangeLog file that directly
mention ATM . ??? , Tia, JimL
23965-<[email protected]> (02/06/03 1.461)
24006: [PATCH] Trivial 2.4.19-pre9: check_region in drivers/atm/horizon.c
24074-
--
38191-<[email protected]> (02/05/20 1.445.2.7)
38230: [PATCH] Fix PPPoATM crash on disconnection
38274-
--
56257-<[email protected]> (02/04/29 1.383.2.89)
56299: Add support for ATM Ethernet bridging (RFC 2684)
56349-
JimL
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> final:
> - 2.4.19-rc5 was released as 2.4.19 with no changes.
> Summary of changes from v2.4.19-rc4 to v2.4.19-rc5
> ============================================
> <[email protected]> (02/08/01 1.662)
> [PATCH] Correct openprom fix
> <[email protected]> (02/07/31 1.661)
> [PATCH] Add missing check to openprom driver
> <[email protected]> (02/08/01 1.663)
> [PATCH] disable READA
> <[email protected]> (02/08/01 1.664)
> Change EXTRAVERSION to -rc5
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
| Network Engineer | P.O. Box 854 | Give me Linux |
| [email protected] | Coudersport PA 16915 | only on AXP |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
Hi there,
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> Haven't the tarballs usuaully been archived as 'linux/' instead of
> 'linux-2.4.19/' ?
Absolutely not. Many systems have a symlink 'linux' to the current
kernel tree, which is a directory e.g. 'linux-2.2.16'. If the tarball
extracts into the 'linux' directory it would overwrite the (presumed
working) source. I'm sure that the use of 'linux' was an oversight.
At least I hope it was.
73,
Ged.
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 22:00, Ged Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
>
> > Haven't the tarballs usuaully been archived as 'linux/' instead of
> > 'linux-2.4.19/' ?
>
> Absolutely not. Many systems have a symlink 'linux' to the current
> kernel tree, which is a directory e.g. 'linux-2.2.16'. If the tarball
Kernels until recently did always unpack into linux/. Linus changed and
I'm happy Marcelo has followed suit, its much more sensible the new way
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 02:40:58PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi T.
>
> Thunder from the hill wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >
> >>PS: After booting 2.4.19 'depmod -a' works as expected, but
> >> 'depmod -ae -F /boot/System.map-2.4.19 2.4.19' doesn't. I
> >> would guess its a problem with depmod.
> >
> >
> >I'd rather guess the problem is that you didn't make dep after config
> >changes. Read the FAQ, please.
>
> Of course 'make dep' was in. But Debian includes modutils 2.4.15. After
> upgrading to 2.4.19 the problem is gone. Debian is out of date :-(.
>
> Maybe it would help to update Documentation/Changes to list the new
> modutils, too?
Are you sure you didn't just get bit by a binutils bug? Newer modutils
are required by newer binutils, but older binutils certainly work. Is
this Debian/unstable or Debian/stable?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
In article <[email protected]>,
Alan Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
| On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 22:00, Ged Haywood wrote:
| > Hi there,
| >
| > On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
| >
| > > Haven't the tarballs usuaully been archived as 'linux/' instead of
| > > 'linux-2.4.19/' ?
| >
| > Absolutely not. Many systems have a symlink 'linux' to the current
| > kernel tree, which is a directory e.g. 'linux-2.2.16'. If the tarball
|
| Kernels until recently did always unpack into linux/. Linus changed and
| I'm happy Marcelo has followed suit, its much more sensible the new way
Let's hope the major fix trees like -aa and -ac follow the convention. I
have no problem with the change (since I keep my stuff that way) but I
hope it is pervasive.
--
bill davidsen <[email protected]>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.