On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:47:04AM +0100, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
>> In my /etc/fstab I have the following entry:
>>
>> /dev/hda1 /win vfat defaults,umask=022 1 1
>>
>> Why does 2.5.47 have user/group restricted permissions on the mount
>> point and all its subdirectories, despite the umask setting?
> Yes. This is due to a somewhat buggy change in 2.5.43.
This is buggy in 2.4.20-rc1 as well.
drwxr--r-- 40 root root 4096 Jan 1 1970 /dos
Any patch for 2.4.20-rcx?
Thanks,
Jeff
[ [email protected] ]
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:52:42PM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> > Yes. This is due to a somewhat buggy change in 2.5.43.
>
> This is buggy in 2.4.20-rc1 as well.
>
> drwxr--r-- 40 root root 4096 Jan 1 1970 /dos
>
> Any patch for 2.4.20-rcx?
Hm. Why do you think this is wrong? Didnt you ask for it?
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> > drwxr--r-- 40 root root 4096 Jan 1 1970 /dos
> >
> > Any patch for 2.4.20-rcx?
>
> Hm. Why do you think this is wrong? Didnt you ask for it?
No, I didn't ask for it.
But, 2.4.20-rc2 seems ok.
'mount -o umask=022' now works under 2.4.20-rc2.
Thanks,
Jeff.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Jeff Chua wrote:
> But, 2.4.20-rc2 seems ok.
>
> 'mount -o umask=022' now works under 2.4.20-rc2.
"remount" doesn't work.
mount -o umask=022 -t vfat /dev/hda1 /dos
mount -o umask=000 -o remount -t vfat /dev/hda1 /dos
The above didn't work.
umount /dos
mount -o umask=022 -t vfat /dev/hda1 /dos
umount /dos
mount -o umask=000 -t vfat /dev/hda1 /dos
Jeff