Hello all,
The following patch addresses buzilla bug # 321, and removes a double
logical issue. Please review for inclusion.
Regards,
Frank
--- linux/drivers/char/ite_gpio.c.old 2003-01-16 21:22:23.000000000 -0500
+++ linux/drivers/char/ite_gpio.c 2003-02-07 02:04:43.000000000 -0500
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
{
int ret=-1;
- if (MAX_GPIO_LINE > *data >= 0)
+ if ((MAX_GPIO_LINE > *data) && (*data >= 0))
ret=ite_gpio_irq_pending[*data];
DEB(printk("ite_gpio_in_status %d ret=%d\n",*data, ret));
In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302071217520.6917-100000@master> you write:
> --- linux/drivers/char/ite_gpio.c.old 2003-01-16 21:22:23.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/drivers/char/ite_gpio.c 2003-02-07 02:04:43.000000000 -0500
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
> {
> int ret=-1;
>
> - if (MAX_GPIO_LINE > *data >= 0)
> + if ((MAX_GPIO_LINE > *data) && (*data >= 0))
> ret=ite_gpio_irq_pending[*data];
>
> DEB(printk("ite_gpio_in_status %d ret=%d\n",*data, ret));
Nope, of course *data is >= 0, it's a u32.
Once again, the author needs to indicate (and test!) what was meant
here...
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
Rusty Russell <[email protected]> said:
> In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302071217520.6917-100000@master> you write:
> > --- linux/drivers/char/ite_gpio.c.old 2003-01-16 21:22:23.000000000 -0500
> > +++ linux/drivers/char/ite_gpio.c 2003-02-07 02:04:43.000000000 -0500
> > @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
> > {
> > int ret=-1;
> >
> > - if (MAX_GPIO_LINE > *data >= 0)
> > + if ((MAX_GPIO_LINE > *data) && (*data >= 0))
> > ret=ite_gpio_irq_pending[*data];
> >
> > DEB(printk("ite_gpio_in_status %d ret=%d\n",*data, ret));
>
> Nope, of course *data is >= 0, it's a u32.
MAX_GPIO_LINE > *data >= 0 is (MAX_GPIO_LINE > *data) >= 0 is (0 or 1) >= 0
is 1 ;-)
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513