2002-10-29 17:27:25

by Mitch Adair

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: 2.4.20-rc1 and i810_audio

I notice that rc1 doesn't have Juergen Sawinski's updates (0.23/0.24)
to i810_audio that allow ICH4 (i845) based chipsets to work. They've
been in AC for a while (since pre5 I think) - just wondering if that is a
merge problem or if there is something else the matter (they seem to
work great on the i845E I've got.)

M


2002-10-29 22:13:29

by Alan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 2.4.20-rc1 and i810_audio

On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 17:33, Mitch Adair wrote:
> I notice that rc1 doesn't have Juergen Sawinski's updates (0.23/0.24)
> to i810_audio that allow ICH4 (i845) based chipsets to work. They've
> been in AC for a while (since pre5 I think) - just wondering if that is a
> merge problem or if there is something else the matter (they seem to
> work great on the i845E I've got.)

They could go in, they seem to work fine. Marcelo ?

2002-10-30 21:05:30

by Marcelo Tosatti

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 2.4.20-rc1 and i810_audio



On 29 Oct 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 17:33, Mitch Adair wrote:
> > I notice that rc1 doesn't have Juergen Sawinski's updates (0.23/0.24)
> > to i810_audio that allow ICH4 (i845) based chipsets to work. They've
> > been in AC for a while (since pre5 I think) - just wondering if that is a
> > merge problem or if there is something else the matter (they seem to
> > work great on the i845E I've got.)
>
> They could go in, they seem to work fine. Marcelo ?

I'll take a look at those updates in -ac.

2002-10-31 20:29:20

by Marcelo Tosatti

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 2.4.20-rc1 and i810_audio



On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

>
>
> On 29 Oct 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 17:33, Mitch Adair wrote:
> > > I notice that rc1 doesn't have Juergen Sawinski's updates (0.23/0.24)
> > > to i810_audio that allow ICH4 (i845) based chipsets to work. They've
> > > been in AC for a while (since pre5 I think) - just wondering if that is a
> > > merge problem or if there is something else the matter (they seem to
> > > work great on the i845E I've got.)
> >
> > They could go in, they seem to work fine. Marcelo ?
>
> I'll take a look at those updates in -ac.

The patch looks fine, but we are in -rc.

Queued for 2.4.21.