2005-01-06 07:11:21

by Harald Dunkel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: 2.6.10: "[permanent]" modules?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi folks,

Seems that for 2.6.10 I cannot unload ide modules.
'lsmod | grep permanent" lists

ide_generic 1152 0 [permanent]
siimage 12480 0 [permanent]
aec62xx 7296 0 [permanent]
trm290 4228 0 [permanent]
alim15x3 10572 0 [permanent]
hpt34x 5184 0 [permanent]
hpt366 20032 0 [permanent]
cmd64x 11996 0 [permanent]
piix 10052 0 [permanent]
rz1000 2496 0 [permanent]
slc90e66 5568 0 [permanent]
generic 3968 0 [permanent]
cs5530 4672 0 [permanent]
cs5520 4672 0 [permanent]
sc1200 7168 0 [permanent]
triflex 3648 0 [permanent]
atiixp 6032 0 [permanent]
pdc202xx_old 11264 0 [permanent]
pdc202xx_new 9088 0 [permanent]
opti621 4420 0 [permanent]
ns87415 3720 0 [permanent]
cy82c693 4416 0 [permanent]
amd74xx 12508 0 [permanent]
sis5513 14280 0 [permanent]
via82cxxx 11996 0 [permanent]
serverworks 7624 0 [permanent]

Is this on purpose?

2bsure, module unloading is enabled in my .config


Regards

Harri
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFB3OSOUTlbRTxpHjcRAkKXAKCPu+7E4L/XxNTE1skyTvy7NUUcdACbBSu9
sAxceT0jHylMiEmL9KBkWXA=
=t0JI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


2005-01-06 09:29:53

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 2.6.10: "[permanent]" modules?

On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 08:11:10AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Seems that for 2.6.10 I cannot unload ide modules.
> 'lsmod | grep permanent" lists

...

> Is this on purpose?

Yes.

2005-01-06 12:47:51

by linux-os

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 2.6.10: "[permanent]" modules?

On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 08:11:10AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Seems that for 2.6.10 I cannot unload ide modules.
>> 'lsmod | grep permanent" lists
>
> ...
>
>> Is this on purpose?
>
> Yes.
>

Can you explain? Normally if a module is no longer in use, it
can be unloaded. I'm sure that there are number of folks
who would like to know how come it's now necessary to reboot
to get rid of some module no longer in use.


Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.6.10 on an i686 machine (5537.79 BogoMips).
Notice : All mail here is now cached for review by Dictator Bush.
98.36% of all statistics are fiction.

Subject: Re: 2.6.10: "[permanent]" modules?

On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:46:53 -0500 (EST), linux-os
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 08:11:10AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> Seems that for 2.6.10 I cannot unload ide modules.
> >> 'lsmod | grep permanent" lists
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> Is this on purpose?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
>
> Can you explain? Normally if a module is no longer in use, it
> can be unloaded. I'm sure that there are number of folks
> who would like to know how come it's now necessary to reboot
> to get rid of some module no longer in use.

It can be unloaded given that the needed locking
and cleanup code are in place...

2005-01-06 17:38:48

by Alan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 2.6.10: "[permanent]" modules?

On Iau, 2005-01-06 at 13:58, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> It can be unloaded given that the needed locking
> and cleanup code are in place...

ie 2.6.10-ac, although I've only enabled it for a few controllers so far
for testing purposes.

Alan