The tty_termios_encode_baud_rate() function as defined by tty_ioctl.c has
a problem with the baud_table within. The comparison operators are
reversed and as a result this table's entries never match and BOTHER is
always used.
Additionally this function's prototype is not exported unlike the
function itself.
This fix addresses both issues.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <[email protected]>
---
It has been tested with checkpatch.pl and at the run time, with a serial
driver (dz) for which I have a change to be submitted soon that will make
it use the function. The hardware being handled only supports some
discrete baud rates (a choice of 15 fixed settings plus an external rate
input), which is why it wants to adjust termios settings according to the
rate setting actually chosen.
Please apply,
Maciej
patch-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904-termios-baud-rate-0
diff -up --recursive --new-file linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904.macro/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
--- linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904.macro/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c 2007-09-04 04:55:31.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c 2007-10-13 23:07:27.000000000 +0000
@@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tty_termios_input_baud_rat
* when calling this function from the driver termios handler.
*/
-void tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(struct ktermios *termios, speed_t ibaud, speed_t obaud)
+void tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(struct ktermios *termios,
+ speed_t ibaud, speed_t obaud)
{
int i = 0;
int ifound = -1, ofound = -1;
@@ -251,12 +252,15 @@ void tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(struct
termios->c_cflag &= ~CBAUD;
do {
- if (obaud - oclose >= baud_table[i] && obaud + oclose <= baud_table[i]) {
+ if (obaud - oclose <= baud_table[i] &&
+ obaud + oclose >= baud_table[i]) {
termios->c_cflag |= baud_bits[i];
ofound = i;
}
- if (ibaud - iclose >= baud_table[i] && ibaud + iclose <= baud_table[i]) {
- /* For the case input == output don't set IBAUD bits if the user didn't do so */
+ if (ibaud - iclose <= baud_table[i] &&
+ ibaud + iclose >= baud_table[i]) {
+ /* For the case input == output don't set IBAUD bits
+ if the user didn't do so */
if (ofound != i || ibinput)
termios->c_cflag |= (baud_bits[i] << IBSHIFT);
ifound = i;
diff -up --recursive --new-file linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904.macro/include/linux/tty.h linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904/include/linux/tty.h
--- linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904.macro/include/linux/tty.h 2007-09-04 04:56:20.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904/include/linux/tty.h 2007-10-13 22:06:06.000000000 +0000
@@ -322,6 +322,8 @@ extern void tty_flip_buffer_push(struct
extern speed_t tty_get_baud_rate(struct tty_struct *tty);
extern speed_t tty_termios_baud_rate(struct ktermios *termios);
extern speed_t tty_termios_input_baud_rate(struct ktermios *termios);
+extern void tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(struct ktermios *termios,
+ speed_t ibaud, speed_t obaud);
extern struct tty_ldisc *tty_ldisc_ref(struct tty_struct *);
extern void tty_ldisc_deref(struct tty_ldisc *);
Since you were sending a fix, possibly I shouldn't comment on this. If so please disregard my
suggestion for a trivial cleanup.
Roel
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> +void tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(struct ktermios *termios,
> + speed_t ibaud, speed_t obaud)
> {
> int i = 0;
> int ifound = -1, ofound = -1;
> @@ -251,12 +252,15 @@ void tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(struct
> termios->c_cflag &= ~CBAUD;
>
> do {
> - if (obaud - oclose >= baud_table[i] && obaud + oclose <= baud_table[i]) {
> + if (obaud - oclose <= baud_table[i] &&
> + obaud + oclose >= baud_table[i]) {
if(a - b <= c && a + b >= c)
if(a <= c + b && a + b >= c)
if(c + b >= a && a + b >= c)
if(b >= a - c && b >= c - a)
true, if:
b >= |a - c|
so
if (oclose >= abs(obaud - baud_table[i])) {
should work as well
> termios->c_cflag |= baud_bits[i];
> ofound = i;
> }
> - if (ibaud - iclose >= baud_table[i] && ibaud + iclose <= baud_table[i]) {
> - /* For the case input == output don't set IBAUD bits if the user didn't do so */
> + if (ibaud - iclose <= baud_table[i] &&
> + ibaud + iclose >= baud_table[i]) {
similarly,
if (iclose >= abs(ibaud - baud_table[i])) {
> + /* For the case input == output don't set IBAUD bits
> + if the user didn't do so */
> if (ofound != i || ibinput)
> termios->c_cflag |= (baud_bits[i] << IBSHIFT);
> ifound = i;
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:12:11 +0100 (BST)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The tty_termios_encode_baud_rate() function as defined by tty_ioctl.c has
> a problem with the baud_table within. The comparison operators are
> reversed and as a result this table's entries never match and BOTHER is
> always used.
Oops. I thought I'd fixed that one. Bit bothersome its been in -mm that
long before anyone noticed.
ACK the first bit.
> Additionally this function's prototype is not exported unlike the
> function itself.
That bit seems out of date and a prototype was added later in -mm
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > The tty_termios_encode_baud_rate() function as defined by tty_ioctl.c has
> > a problem with the baud_table within. The comparison operators are
> > reversed and as a result this table's entries never match and BOTHER is
> > always used.
>
> Oops. I thought I'd fixed that one. Bit bothersome its been in -mm that
> long before anyone noticed.
-ENOTENOUGHUSERS?
> > Additionally this function's prototype is not exported unlike the
> > function itself.
>
> That bit seems out of date and a prototype was added later in -mm
Given the function has survived for quite a while without a prototype
exported (how to use it otherwise? -- I guess set_sgttyb() does not count
as hardly anybody should be calling it), I suppose it is no surprise it
was not adequately tested. ;-)
Maciej
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Roel Kluin wrote:
> if (oclose >= abs(obaud - baud_table[i])) {
>
> should work as well
Hmm, I am not sure if it is clearer or produces better code, but send a
patch -- I will not object.
Maciej