Commit 54ce1927eb78 ("cxl/cper: Fix errant CPER prints for CXL events")
moved the CXL CPER section defines to include/linux/cper.h from ghes.c
When the latest cxl/cper series was reworked those defines were kept in
ghes.c by accident. Thus they were duplicated.
Delete the duplicate defines keeping them in the header to be shared
between efi and apei.
Suggested-by: De Francesco, Fabio <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
---
No fixes tag because the change is only in linux-next.
Tony can I get a quick ack? I think this should go through the CXL tree
and picked up by Dave.
---
drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 26 --------------------------
1 file changed, 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index 2247a1535b52..623cc0cb4a65 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -676,32 +676,6 @@ static void ghes_defer_non_standard_event(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
schedule_work(&entry->work);
}
-/* CXL Event record UUIDs are formated as GUIDs and reported in section type */
-
-/*
- * General Media Event Record
- * CXL rev 3.0 Section 8.2.9.2.1.1; Table 8-43
- */
-#define CPER_SEC_CXL_GEN_MEDIA_GUID \
- GUID_INIT(0xfbcd0a77, 0xc260, 0x417f, \
- 0x85, 0xa9, 0x08, 0x8b, 0x16, 0x21, 0xeb, 0xa6)
-
-/*
- * DRAM Event Record
- * CXL rev 3.0 section 8.2.9.2.1.2; Table 8-44
- */
-#define CPER_SEC_CXL_DRAM_GUID \
- GUID_INIT(0x601dcbb3, 0x9c06, 0x4eab, \
- 0xb8, 0xaf, 0x4e, 0x9b, 0xfb, 0x5c, 0x96, 0x24)
-
-/*
- * Memory Module Event Record
- * CXL rev 3.0 section 8.2.9.2.1.3; Table 8-45
- */
-#define CPER_SEC_CXL_MEM_MODULE_GUID \
- GUID_INIT(0xfe927475, 0xdd59, 0x4339, \
- 0xa5, 0x86, 0x79, 0xba, 0xb1, 0x13, 0xb7, 0x74)
-
/* Room for 8 entries for each of the 4 event log queues */
#define CXL_CPER_FIFO_DEPTH 32
DEFINE_KFIFO(cxl_cper_fifo, struct cxl_cper_work_data, CXL_CPER_FIFO_DEPTH);
---
base-commit: eedb1dd62a7e7471cef18de55d3794cb64adb818
change-id: 20240502-cper-fix-dup-guid-f4c65598190f
Best regards,
--
Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
> No fixes tag because the change is only in linux-next.
Do you expect that other commit to be backported to stable/LTS kernels?
If so, a Fixes: tag would help tools find this one to pull along too.
> Tony can I get a quick ack? I think this should go through the CXL tree
> and picked up by Dave.
Sure ... deleting duplicates. Seems good to me.
Acked-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
-Tony