This was reported by sparse:
drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c:39:7: warning: symbol 'kpc_dma_add_device
' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Valerio Genovese <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h
index ee47f43e71cf..19e88c3bc13f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct dev_private_data {
};
struct kpc_dma_device *kpc_dma_lookup_device(int minor);
+void kpc_dma_add_device(struct kpc_dma_device *ldev);
extern const struct file_operations kpc_dma_fops;
--
2.17.1
>This was reported by sparse:
>drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c:39:7: warning: symbol
>'kpc_dma_add_device
>' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
>Signed-off-by: Valerio Genovese <[email protected]>
>---
> drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h
>b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h
>index ee47f43e71cf..19e88c3bc13f 100644
>--- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h
>+++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h
>@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct dev_private_data {
> };
>
> struct kpc_dma_device *kpc_dma_lookup_device(int minor);
>+void kpc_dma_add_device(struct kpc_dma_device *ldev);
>
> extern const struct file_operations kpc_dma_fops;
>
Wouldn't it be better to mark the function static?
It's only used in kpc_dma_driver.c which is where it's defined.
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 05:57:11PM +0200, Valerio Genovese wrote:
> This was reported by sparse:
> drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c:39:7: warning: symbol 'kpc_dma_add_device
> ' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Valerio Genovese <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h
> index ee47f43e71cf..19e88c3bc13f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct dev_private_data {
> };
>
> struct kpc_dma_device *kpc_dma_lookup_device(int minor);
> +void kpc_dma_add_device(struct kpc_dma_device *ldev);
>
> extern const struct file_operations kpc_dma_fops;
>
This is not how you fix this issue.
Look at the warning given to you. Think about your C programming
knowledge and remember what the 'static' keyword is and does.
Then fix the issue properly.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback. I re-submitted the patch as v2.
best,
Valerio
Il 05/06/19 18:11, Greg KH ha scritto:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 05:57:11PM +0200, Valerio Genovese wrote:
>> This was reported by sparse:
>> drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c:39:7: warning: symbol 'kpc_dma_add_device
>> ' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Valerio Genovese <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h
>> index ee47f43e71cf..19e88c3bc13f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.h
>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct dev_private_data {
>> };
>>
>> struct kpc_dma_device *kpc_dma_lookup_device(int minor);
>> +void kpc_dma_add_device(struct kpc_dma_device *ldev);
>>
>> extern const struct file_operations kpc_dma_fops;
>>
>
> This is not how you fix this issue.
>
> Look at the warning given to you. Think about your C programming
> knowledge and remember what the 'static' keyword is and does.
>
> Then fix the issue properly.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>