2018-10-30 01:04:52

by Andy Tang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support

From: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>

The QorIQ Layerscape SoC has several thermal sensors but the current
driver only supports one.

Massage the code to be sensor oriented and allow the support for
multiple sensors.

Signed-off-by: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
---
v3:
- add Reviewed-by
v2:
- update the commit message
- refine the qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone()

drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
index 450ed66..8beb344 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
@@ -59,14 +59,21 @@ struct qoriq_tmu_regs {
u32 ttr3cr; /* Temperature Range 3 Control Register */
};

+struct qoriq_tmu_data;
+
/*
* Thermal zone data
*/
+struct qoriq_sensor {
+ struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
+ struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata;
+ int id;
+};
+
struct qoriq_tmu_data {
- struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
struct qoriq_tmu_regs __iomem *regs;
- int sensor_id;
bool little_endian;
+ struct qoriq_sensor *sensor[SITES_MAX];
};

static void tmu_write(struct qoriq_tmu_data *p, u32 val, void __iomem *addr)
@@ -87,48 +94,51 @@ static u32 tmu_read(struct qoriq_tmu_data *p, void __iomem *addr)

static int tmu_get_temp(void *p, int *temp)
{
+ struct qoriq_sensor *qsensor = p;
+ struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = qsensor->qdata;
u32 val;
- struct qoriq_tmu_data *data = p;

- val = tmu_read(data, &data->regs->site[data->sensor_id].tritsr);
+ val = tmu_read(qdata, &qdata->regs->site[qsensor->id].tritsr);
*temp = (val & 0xff) * 1000;

return 0;
}

-static int qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id(void)
+static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
+ .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
+};
+
+static int qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- int ret, id;
- struct of_phandle_args sensor_specs;
- struct device_node *np, *sensor_np;
+ struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ int id, sites = 0;

- np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "thermal-zones");
- if (!np)
- return -ENODEV;
+ for (id = 0; id < SITES_MAX; id++) {
+ qdata->sensor[id] = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(struct qoriq_sensor), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!qdata->sensor[id])
+ return -ENOMEM;

- sensor_np = of_get_next_child(np, NULL);
- ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(sensor_np, "thermal-sensors",
- "#thermal-sensor-cells",
- 0, &sensor_specs);
- if (ret) {
- of_node_put(np);
- of_node_put(sensor_np);
- return ret;
- }
+ qdata->sensor[id]->id = id;
+ qdata->sensor[id]->qdata = qdata;

- if (sensor_specs.args_count >= 1) {
- id = sensor_specs.args[0];
- WARN(sensor_specs.args_count > 1,
- "%s: too many cells in sensor specifier %d\n",
- sensor_specs.np->name, sensor_specs.args_count);
- } else {
- id = 0;
- }
+ qdata->sensor[id]->tzd = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(
+ &pdev->dev, id, qdata->sensor[id], &tmu_tz_ops);
+ if (IS_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd)) {
+ if (PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd) == -ENODEV)
+ continue;
+ else
+ return PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd);

- of_node_put(np);
- of_node_put(sensor_np);
+ }
+
+ sites |= 0x1 << (15 - id);
+ }
+ /* Enable monitoring */
+ if (sites != 0)
+ tmu_write(qdata, sites | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF, &qdata->regs->tmr);

- return id;
+ return 0;
}

static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -178,16 +188,11 @@ static void qoriq_tmu_init_device(struct qoriq_tmu_data *data)
tmu_write(data, TMR_DISABLE, &data->regs->tmr);
}

-static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
- .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
-};
-
static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
int ret;
struct qoriq_tmu_data *data;
struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
- u32 site;

if (!np) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device OF-Node is NULL");
@@ -203,13 +208,6 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

data->little_endian = of_property_read_bool(np, "little-endian");

- data->sensor_id = qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id();
- if (data->sensor_id < 0) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get sensor id\n");
- ret = -ENODEV;
- goto err_iomap;
- }
-
data->regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
if (!data->regs) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get memory region\n");
@@ -223,19 +221,13 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret < 0)
goto err_tmu;

- data->tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
- data->sensor_id,
- data, &tmu_tz_ops);
- if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
- dev_err(&pdev->dev,
- "Failed to register thermal zone device %d\n", ret);
- goto err_tmu;
+ ret = qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(pdev);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register sensors\n");
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto err_iomap;
}

- /* Enable monitoring */
- site = 0x1 << (15 - data->sensor_id);
- tmu_write(data, site | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF, &data->regs->tmr);

return 0;

--
1.7.1



2018-11-14 07:29:36

by Andy Tang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support

PING.

BR,
Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Sent: 2018??10??30?? 9:00
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Andy Tang <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
>
> From: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
>
> The QorIQ Layerscape SoC has several thermal sensors but the current
> driver only supports one.
>
> Massage the code to be sensor oriented and allow the support for
> multiple sensors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
> ---
> v3:
> - add Reviewed-by
> v2:
> - update the commit message
> - refine the qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone()
>
> drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 100
> ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c index 450ed66..8beb344 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> @@ -59,14 +59,21 @@ struct qoriq_tmu_regs {
> u32 ttr3cr; /* Temperature Range 3 Control Register */
> };
>
> +struct qoriq_tmu_data;
> +
> /*
> * Thermal zone data
> */
> +struct qoriq_sensor {
> + struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata;
> + int id;
> +};
> +
> struct qoriq_tmu_data {
> - struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> struct qoriq_tmu_regs __iomem *regs;
> - int sensor_id;
> bool little_endian;
> + struct qoriq_sensor *sensor[SITES_MAX];
> };
>
> static void tmu_write(struct qoriq_tmu_data *p, u32 val, void __iomem
> *addr) @@ -87,48 +94,51 @@ static u32 tmu_read(struct
> qoriq_tmu_data *p, void __iomem *addr)
>
> static int tmu_get_temp(void *p, int *temp) {
> + struct qoriq_sensor *qsensor = p;
> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = qsensor->qdata;
> u32 val;
> - struct qoriq_tmu_data *data = p;
>
> - val = tmu_read(data, &data->regs->site[data->sensor_id].tritsr);
> + val = tmu_read(qdata, &qdata->regs->site[qsensor->id].tritsr);
> *temp = (val & 0xff) * 1000;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id(void)
> +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> + .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> +};
> +
> +static int qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - int ret, id;
> - struct of_phandle_args sensor_specs;
> - struct device_node *np, *sensor_np;
> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + int id, sites = 0;
>
> - np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "thermal-zones");
> - if (!np)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + for (id = 0; id < SITES_MAX; id++) {
> + qdata->sensor[id] = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> + sizeof(struct qoriq_sensor), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!qdata->sensor[id])
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> - sensor_np = of_get_next_child(np, NULL);
> - ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(sensor_np, "thermal-sensors",
> - "#thermal-sensor-cells",
> - 0, &sensor_specs);
> - if (ret) {
> - of_node_put(np);
> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + qdata->sensor[id]->id = id;
> + qdata->sensor[id]->qdata = qdata;
>
> - if (sensor_specs.args_count >= 1) {
> - id = sensor_specs.args[0];
> - WARN(sensor_specs.args_count > 1,
> - "%s: too many cells in sensor specifier %d\n",
> - sensor_specs.np->name, sensor_specs.args_count);
> - } else {
> - id = 0;
> - }
> + qdata->sensor[id]->tzd =
> devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(
> + &pdev->dev, id, qdata->sensor[id], &tmu_tz_ops);
> + if (IS_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd) == -ENODEV)
> + continue;
> + else
> + return PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd);
>
> - of_node_put(np);
> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> + }
> +
> + sites |= 0x1 << (15 - id);
> + }
> + /* Enable monitoring */
> + if (sites != 0)
> + tmu_write(qdata, sites | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF,
> &qdata->regs->tmr);
>
> - return id;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct platform_device *pdev) @@
> -178,16 +188,11 @@ static void qoriq_tmu_init_device(struct
> qoriq_tmu_data *data)
> tmu_write(data, TMR_DISABLE, &data->regs->tmr); }
>
> -static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> - .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> -};
> -
> static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> int ret;
> struct qoriq_tmu_data *data;
> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> - u32 site;
>
> if (!np) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device OF-Node is NULL"); @@ -203,13
> +208,6 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> data->little_endian = of_property_read_bool(np, "little-endian");
>
> - data->sensor_id = qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id();
> - if (data->sensor_id < 0) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get sensor id\n");
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto err_iomap;
> - }
> -
> data->regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
> if (!data->regs) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get memory region\n"); @@
> -223,19 +221,13 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> if (ret < 0)
> goto err_tmu;
>
> - data->tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
> - data->sensor_id,
> - data, &tmu_tz_ops);
> - if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> - "Failed to register thermal zone device %d\n", ret);
> - goto err_tmu;
> + ret = qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(pdev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register sensors\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_iomap;
> }
>
> - /* Enable monitoring */
> - site = 0x1 << (15 - data->sensor_id);
> - tmu_write(data, site | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF, &data->regs->tmr);
>
> return 0;
>
> --
> 1.7.1

2018-11-21 01:36:07

by Andy Tang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support

Hi all,

Do you have any comments on this patch?

I found for our thermal driver(qoriq_thermal.c) there are different between the following two git trees:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux.git
branch: next
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal.git.
branch: next

Could you please clarify which git tree/branch should I use?

BR,
Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Tang
> Sent: 2018??11??14?? 15:29
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
>
> PING.
>
> BR,
> Andy
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Sent: 2018??10??30?? 9:00
> > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; Andy Tang <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
> >
> > From: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
> >
> > The QorIQ Layerscape SoC has several thermal sensors but the current
> > driver only supports one.
> >
> > Massage the code to be sensor oriented and allow the support for
> > multiple sensors.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > v3:
> > - add Reviewed-by
> > v2:
> > - update the commit message
> > - refine the qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone()
> >
> > drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 100
> > ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c index 450ed66..8beb344 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > @@ -59,14 +59,21 @@ struct qoriq_tmu_regs {
> > u32 ttr3cr; /* Temperature Range 3 Control Register */
> > };
> >
> > +struct qoriq_tmu_data;
> > +
> > /*
> > * Thermal zone data
> > */
> > +struct qoriq_sensor {
> > + struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
> > + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata;
> > + int id;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct qoriq_tmu_data {
> > - struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> > struct qoriq_tmu_regs __iomem *regs;
> > - int sensor_id;
> > bool little_endian;
> > + struct qoriq_sensor *sensor[SITES_MAX];
> > };
> >
> > static void tmu_write(struct qoriq_tmu_data *p, u32 val, void __iomem
> > *addr) @@ -87,48 +94,51 @@ static u32 tmu_read(struct
> qoriq_tmu_data
> > *p, void __iomem *addr)
> >
> > static int tmu_get_temp(void *p, int *temp) {
> > + struct qoriq_sensor *qsensor = p;
> > + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = qsensor->qdata;
> > u32 val;
> > - struct qoriq_tmu_data *data = p;
> >
> > - val = tmu_read(data, &data->regs->site[data->sensor_id].tritsr);
> > + val = tmu_read(qdata, &qdata->regs->site[qsensor->id].tritsr);
> > *temp = (val & 0xff) * 1000;
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id(void)
> > +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> > + .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > - int ret, id;
> > - struct of_phandle_args sensor_specs;
> > - struct device_node *np, *sensor_np;
> > + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + int id, sites = 0;
> >
> > - np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "thermal-zones");
> > - if (!np)
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > + for (id = 0; id < SITES_MAX; id++) {
> > + qdata->sensor[id] = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> > + sizeof(struct qoriq_sensor), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!qdata->sensor[id])
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - sensor_np = of_get_next_child(np, NULL);
> > - ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(sensor_np, "thermal-sensors",
> > - "#thermal-sensor-cells",
> > - 0, &sensor_specs);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - of_node_put(np);
> > - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > + qdata->sensor[id]->id = id;
> > + qdata->sensor[id]->qdata = qdata;
> >
> > - if (sensor_specs.args_count >= 1) {
> > - id = sensor_specs.args[0];
> > - WARN(sensor_specs.args_count > 1,
> > - "%s: too many cells in sensor specifier %d\n",
> > - sensor_specs.np->name, sensor_specs.args_count);
> > - } else {
> > - id = 0;
> > - }
> > + qdata->sensor[id]->tzd =
> > devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(
> > + &pdev->dev, id, qdata->sensor[id], &tmu_tz_ops);
> > + if (IS_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd)) {
> > + if (PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd) == -ENODEV)
> > + continue;
> > + else
> > + return PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd);
> >
> > - of_node_put(np);
> > - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> > + }
> > +
> > + sites |= 0x1 << (15 - id);
> > + }
> > + /* Enable monitoring */
> > + if (sites != 0)
> > + tmu_write(qdata, sites | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF,
> > &qdata->regs->tmr);
> >
> > - return id;
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct platform_device *pdev) @@
> > -178,16 +188,11 @@ static void qoriq_tmu_init_device(struct
> > qoriq_tmu_data *data)
> > tmu_write(data, TMR_DISABLE, &data->regs->tmr); }
> >
> > -static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> > - .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> > -};
> > -
> > static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > int ret;
> > struct qoriq_tmu_data *data;
> > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > - u32 site;
> >
> > if (!np) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device OF-Node is NULL"); @@ -203,13
> > +208,6 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > data->little_endian = of_property_read_bool(np, "little-endian");
> >
> > - data->sensor_id = qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id();
> > - if (data->sensor_id < 0) {
> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get sensor id\n");
> > - ret = -ENODEV;
> > - goto err_iomap;
> > - }
> > -
> > data->regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
> > if (!data->regs) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get memory region\n"); @@
> > -223,19 +221,13 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > if (ret < 0)
> > goto err_tmu;
> >
> > - data->tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
> > - data->sensor_id,
> > - data, &tmu_tz_ops);
> > - if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > - "Failed to register thermal zone device %d\n", ret);
> > - goto err_tmu;
> > + ret = qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(pdev);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register sensors\n");
> > + ret = -ENODEV;
> > + goto err_iomap;
> > }
> >
> > - /* Enable monitoring */
> > - site = 0x1 << (15 - data->sensor_id);
> > - tmu_write(data, site | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF, &data->regs->tmr);
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.1

2018-11-21 08:50:38

by Daniel Lezcano

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support

On 21/11/2018 02:34, Andy Tang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Do you have any comments on this patch?
>
> I found for our thermal driver(qoriq_thermal.c) there are different between the following two git trees:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux.git
> branch: next
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal.git.
> branch: next
>
> Could you please clarify which git tree/branch should I use?

SoC changes are submitted against linux-soc-thermal.git.

Generic thermal framework are sent against Zhang Rui's tree but it
happens sometimes Eduardo pick them also when the changes are related to
SoC behavior.

However, I agree that can be confusing :)

Eduardo, Rui,

how about to add a section in the maintainer handbook for the thermal to
clarify the expectations and the flow?

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andy Tang
>> Sent: 2018??11??14?? 15:29
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
>> [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
>>
>> PING.
>>
>> BR,
>> Andy
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: 2018??10??30?? 9:00
>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
>>> [email protected]; Andy Tang <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
>>>
>>> From: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> The QorIQ Layerscape SoC has several thermal sensors but the current
>>> driver only supports one.
>>>
>>> Massage the code to be sensor oriented and allow the support for
>>> multiple sensors.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> v3:
>>> - add Reviewed-by
>>> v2:
>>> - update the commit message
>>> - refine the qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone()
>>>
>>> drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 100
>>> ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>> 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
>>> b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c index 450ed66..8beb344 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
>>> @@ -59,14 +59,21 @@ struct qoriq_tmu_regs {
>>> u32 ttr3cr; /* Temperature Range 3 Control Register */
>>> };
>>>
>>> +struct qoriq_tmu_data;
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * Thermal zone data
>>> */
>>> +struct qoriq_sensor {
>>> + struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
>>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata;
>>> + int id;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> struct qoriq_tmu_data {
>>> - struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
>>> struct qoriq_tmu_regs __iomem *regs;
>>> - int sensor_id;
>>> bool little_endian;
>>> + struct qoriq_sensor *sensor[SITES_MAX];
>>> };
>>>
>>> static void tmu_write(struct qoriq_tmu_data *p, u32 val, void __iomem
>>> *addr) @@ -87,48 +94,51 @@ static u32 tmu_read(struct
>> qoriq_tmu_data
>>> *p, void __iomem *addr)
>>>
>>> static int tmu_get_temp(void *p, int *temp) {
>>> + struct qoriq_sensor *qsensor = p;
>>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = qsensor->qdata;
>>> u32 val;
>>> - struct qoriq_tmu_data *data = p;
>>>
>>> - val = tmu_read(data, &data->regs->site[data->sensor_id].tritsr);
>>> + val = tmu_read(qdata, &qdata->regs->site[qsensor->id].tritsr);
>>> *temp = (val & 0xff) * 1000;
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static int qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id(void)
>>> +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
>>> + .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static int qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> {
>>> - int ret, id;
>>> - struct of_phandle_args sensor_specs;
>>> - struct device_node *np, *sensor_np;
>>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> + int id, sites = 0;
>>>
>>> - np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "thermal-zones");
>>> - if (!np)
>>> - return -ENODEV;
>>> + for (id = 0; id < SITES_MAX; id++) {
>>> + qdata->sensor[id] = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>>> + sizeof(struct qoriq_sensor), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!qdata->sensor[id])
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>> - sensor_np = of_get_next_child(np, NULL);
>>> - ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(sensor_np, "thermal-sensors",
>>> - "#thermal-sensor-cells",
>>> - 0, &sensor_specs);
>>> - if (ret) {
>>> - of_node_put(np);
>>> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
>>> - return ret;
>>> - }
>>> + qdata->sensor[id]->id = id;
>>> + qdata->sensor[id]->qdata = qdata;
>>>
>>> - if (sensor_specs.args_count >= 1) {
>>> - id = sensor_specs.args[0];
>>> - WARN(sensor_specs.args_count > 1,
>>> - "%s: too many cells in sensor specifier %d\n",
>>> - sensor_specs.np->name, sensor_specs.args_count);
>>> - } else {
>>> - id = 0;
>>> - }
>>> + qdata->sensor[id]->tzd =
>>> devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(
>>> + &pdev->dev, id, qdata->sensor[id], &tmu_tz_ops);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd)) {
>>> + if (PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd) == -ENODEV)
>>> + continue;
>>> + else
>>> + return PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd);
>>>
>>> - of_node_put(np);
>>> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + sites |= 0x1 << (15 - id);
>>> + }
>>> + /* Enable monitoring */
>>> + if (sites != 0)
>>> + tmu_write(qdata, sites | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF,
>>> &qdata->regs->tmr);
>>>
>>> - return id;
>>> + return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct platform_device *pdev) @@
>>> -178,16 +188,11 @@ static void qoriq_tmu_init_device(struct
>>> qoriq_tmu_data *data)
>>> tmu_write(data, TMR_DISABLE, &data->regs->tmr); }
>>>
>>> -static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
>>> - .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
>>> int ret;
>>> struct qoriq_tmu_data *data;
>>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>> - u32 site;
>>>
>>> if (!np) {
>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device OF-Node is NULL"); @@ -203,13
>>> +208,6 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>
>>> data->little_endian = of_property_read_bool(np, "little-endian");
>>>
>>> - data->sensor_id = qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id();
>>> - if (data->sensor_id < 0) {
>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get sensor id\n");
>>> - ret = -ENODEV;
>>> - goto err_iomap;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> data->regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
>>> if (!data->regs) {
>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get memory region\n"); @@
>>> -223,19 +221,13 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>> if (ret < 0)
>>> goto err_tmu;
>>>
>>> - data->tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
>>> - data->sensor_id,
>>> - data, &tmu_tz_ops);
>>> - if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
>>> - ret = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>>> - "Failed to register thermal zone device %d\n", ret);
>>> - goto err_tmu;
>>> + ret = qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(pdev);
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register sensors\n");
>>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>>> + goto err_iomap;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - /* Enable monitoring */
>>> - site = 0x1 << (15 - data->sensor_id);
>>> - tmu_write(data, site | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF, &data->regs->tmr);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> --
>>> 1.7.1
>


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ?? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


2018-11-21 09:17:22

by Andy Tang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for your explanation. The problem is these two trees are not synced well.
Let's take our driver(qoriq_thermal.c) for example.

Git log on Rui's tree next branch:
2dfef65 thermal: qoriq: Switch to SPDX identifier
1a893a5 thermal: qoriq: Simplify the 'site' variable assignment
f1506a6 thermal: qoriq: Use devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support

Git log on linux-soc-thermal tree branch next:
6017e2a thermal: qoriq: add i.mx8mq support
9b96566 thermal: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support

You can see that the first 2-3 commits on these two tress are different.

The strange thing is they seems sync well on Linus' tree:
0ef7791 Merge branch 'linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal
6017e2a thermal: qoriq: add i.mx8mq support
9b96566 thermal: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
2dfef65 thermal: qoriq: Switch to SPDX identifier
1a893a5 thermal: qoriq: Simplify the 'site' variable assignment
f1506a6 thermal: qoriq: Use devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support

Currently my patch was created based on Run's tree, probably I should rebase it to soc tree.
But whichever tree I use, it can't be merged to Linus' tree without conflict.

Something I missed?

BR,
Andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
> Sent: 2018??11??21?? 16:44
> To: Andy Tang <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
>
> On 21/11/2018 02:34, Andy Tang wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Do you have any comments on this patch?
> >
> > I found for our thermal driver(qoriq_thermal.c) there are different
> between the following two git trees:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux.git
> > branch: next
> >
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal.gi
> t.
> > branch: next
> >
> > Could you please clarify which git tree/branch should I use?
>
> SoC changes are submitted against linux-soc-thermal.git.
>
> Generic thermal framework are sent against Zhang Rui's tree but it
> happens sometimes Eduardo pick them also when the changes are related
> to SoC behavior.
>
> However, I agree that can be confusing :)
>
> Eduardo, Rui,
>
> how about to add a section in the maintainer handbook for the thermal to
> clarify the expectations and the flow?
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andy Tang
> >> Sent: 2018??11??14?? 15:29
> >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> >> [email protected]
> >> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
> >>
> >> PING.
> >>
> >> BR,
> >> Andy
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> >>> Sent: 2018??10??30?? 9:00
> >>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> >>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> >>> [email protected]; Andy Tang <[email protected]>
> >>> Subject: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
> >>>
> >>> From: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>> The QorIQ Layerscape SoC has several thermal sensors but the
> current
> >>> driver only supports one.
> >>>
> >>> Massage the code to be sensor oriented and allow the support for
> >>> multiple sensors.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
> >>> ---
> >>> v3:
> >>> - add Reviewed-by
> >>> v2:
> >>> - update the commit message
> >>> - refine the qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone()
> >>>
> >>> drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 100
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >>> 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> >>> b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c index 450ed66..8beb344 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> >>> @@ -59,14 +59,21 @@ struct qoriq_tmu_regs {
> >>> u32 ttr3cr; /* Temperature Range 3 Control Register */
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> +struct qoriq_tmu_data;
> >>> +
> >>> /*
> >>> * Thermal zone data
> >>> */
> >>> +struct qoriq_sensor {
> >>> + struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
> >>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata;
> >>> + int id;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> struct qoriq_tmu_data {
> >>> - struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> >>> struct qoriq_tmu_regs __iomem *regs;
> >>> - int sensor_id;
> >>> bool little_endian;
> >>> + struct qoriq_sensor *sensor[SITES_MAX];
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> static void tmu_write(struct qoriq_tmu_data *p, u32 val, void
> >>> __iomem
> >>> *addr) @@ -87,48 +94,51 @@ static u32 tmu_read(struct
> >> qoriq_tmu_data
> >>> *p, void __iomem *addr)
> >>>
> >>> static int tmu_get_temp(void *p, int *temp) {
> >>> + struct qoriq_sensor *qsensor = p;
> >>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = qsensor->qdata;
> >>> u32 val;
> >>> - struct qoriq_tmu_data *data = p;
> >>>
> >>> - val = tmu_read(data, &data->regs->site[data->sensor_id].tritsr);
> >>> + val = tmu_read(qdata, &qdata->regs->site[qsensor->id].tritsr);
> >>> *temp = (val & 0xff) * 1000;
> >>>
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> -static int qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id(void)
> >>> +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> >>> + .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static int qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(struct platform_device
> >>> +*pdev)
> >>> {
> >>> - int ret, id;
> >>> - struct of_phandle_args sensor_specs;
> >>> - struct device_node *np, *sensor_np;
> >>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >>> + int id, sites = 0;
> >>>
> >>> - np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "thermal-zones");
> >>> - if (!np)
> >>> - return -ENODEV;
> >>> + for (id = 0; id < SITES_MAX; id++) {
> >>> + qdata->sensor[id] = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> >>> + sizeof(struct qoriq_sensor), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> + if (!qdata->sensor[id])
> >>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>>
> >>> - sensor_np = of_get_next_child(np, NULL);
> >>> - ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(sensor_np,
> "thermal-sensors",
> >>> - "#thermal-sensor-cells",
> >>> - 0, &sensor_specs);
> >>> - if (ret) {
> >>> - of_node_put(np);
> >>> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> >>> - return ret;
> >>> - }
> >>> + qdata->sensor[id]->id = id;
> >>> + qdata->sensor[id]->qdata = qdata;
> >>>
> >>> - if (sensor_specs.args_count >= 1) {
> >>> - id = sensor_specs.args[0];
> >>> - WARN(sensor_specs.args_count > 1,
> >>> - "%s: too many cells in sensor specifier %d\n",
> >>> - sensor_specs.np->name,
> sensor_specs.args_count);
> >>> - } else {
> >>> - id = 0;
> >>> - }
> >>> + qdata->sensor[id]->tzd =
> >>> devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(
> >>> + &pdev->dev, id, qdata->sensor[id], &tmu_tz_ops);
> >>> + if (IS_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd)) {
> >>> + if (PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd) == -ENODEV)
> >>> + continue;
> >>> + else
> >>> + return PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd);
> >>>
> >>> - of_node_put(np);
> >>> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + sites |= 0x1 << (15 - id);
> >>> + }
> >>> + /* Enable monitoring */
> >>> + if (sites != 0)
> >>> + tmu_write(qdata, sites | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF,
> >>> &qdata->regs->tmr);
> >>>
> >>> - return id;
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct platform_device *pdev) @@
> >>> -178,16 +188,11 @@ static void qoriq_tmu_init_device(struct
> >>> qoriq_tmu_data *data)
> >>> tmu_write(data, TMR_DISABLE, &data->regs->tmr); }
> >>>
> >>> -static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> >>> - .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> >>> -};
> >>> -
> >>> static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> >>> int ret;
> >>> struct qoriq_tmu_data *data;
> >>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> >>> - u32 site;
> >>>
> >>> if (!np) {
> >>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device OF-Node is NULL"); @@
> -203,13
> >>> +208,6 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> >>>
> >>> data->little_endian = of_property_read_bool(np, "little-endian");
> >>>
> >>> - data->sensor_id = qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id();
> >>> - if (data->sensor_id < 0) {
> >>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get sensor id\n");
> >>> - ret = -ENODEV;
> >>> - goto err_iomap;
> >>> - }
> >>> -
> >>> data->regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
> >>> if (!data->regs) {
> >>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get memory region\n");
> @@
> >>> -223,19 +221,13 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct
> platform_device
> >>> *pdev)
> >>> if (ret < 0)
> >>> goto err_tmu;
> >>>
> >>> - data->tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
> >>> - data->sensor_id,
> >>> - data, &tmu_tz_ops);
> >>> - if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
> >>> - ret = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
> >>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> >>> - "Failed to register thermal zone device %d\n", ret);
> >>> - goto err_tmu;
> >>> + ret = qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(pdev);
> >>> + if (ret < 0) {
> >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register sensors\n");
> >>> + ret = -ENODEV;
> >>> + goto err_iomap;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - /* Enable monitoring */
> >>> - site = 0x1 << (15 - data->sensor_id);
> >>> - tmu_write(data, site | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF, &data->regs->tmr);
> >>>
> >>> return 0;
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 1.7.1
> >
>
>
> --
>
> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> http://www.linaro.org%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40nxp.com%7Ca0
> d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c
> 301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=AVw3XdjmiRO
> XP7Xz7MTNMVgzI8hYG9aWsR02opMZqjM%3D&amp;reserved=0>
> Linaro.org ?? Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro:
> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> http://www.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FLinaro&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tan
> g%40nxp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3b
> c2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;s
> data=NM8wm4ri%2F2kdBW0FdCSXrL5ogg6owPfoRGacqm%2BKsEw%3D&a
> mp;reserved=0> Facebook |
> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ft
> witter.com%2F%23!%2Flinaroorg&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40n
> xp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6
> fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=
> Wplqwpisgmqrf3yLhTzdo5O6TvN2Jfu5IjBTvS4xOWk%3D&amp;reserved=0>
> Twitter |
> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> http://www.linaro.org%2Flinaro-blog%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40
> nxp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c
> 6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=I
> b6KFIP3LNPGuDDb1dpnOllrqAAsc%2BZNCUuJZUPso6k%3D&amp;reserve
> d=0> Blog

2018-11-21 09:43:47

by Daniel Lezcano

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support

On 21/11/2018 10:16, Andy Tang wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for your explanation. The problem is these two trees are not synced well.
> Let's take our driver(qoriq_thermal.c) for example.
>
> Git log on Rui's tree next branch:
> 2dfef65 thermal: qoriq: Switch to SPDX identifier
> 1a893a5 thermal: qoriq: Simplify the 'site' variable assignment
> f1506a6 thermal: qoriq: Use devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
> c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
> 0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
> 4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
>
> Git log on linux-soc-thermal tree branch next:
> 6017e2a thermal: qoriq: add i.mx8mq support
> 9b96566 thermal: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
> c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
> 0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
> 4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
>
> You can see that the first 2-3 commits on these two tress are different.
>
> The strange thing is they seems sync well on Linus' tree:
> 0ef7791 Merge branch 'linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal
> 6017e2a thermal: qoriq: add i.mx8mq support
> 9b96566 thermal: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
> 2dfef65 thermal: qoriq: Switch to SPDX identifier
> 1a893a5 thermal: qoriq: Simplify the 'site' variable assignment
> f1506a6 thermal: qoriq: Use devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
> c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
> 0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
> 4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
>
> Currently my patch was created based on Run's tree, probably I should rebase it to soc tree.
> But whichever tree I use, it can't be merged to Linus' tree without conflict.
>
> Something I missed?

No.

Eduardo, Rui,

why not create a 'thermal' group ala 'tip' group with a single tree and
two branches:

thermal/next
thermal/fixes

- Rui takes the core changes.
- Eduardo takes the SoC changes.

- Both commit to thermal/next
- Both commit to thermal/fixes
- Both merge thermal/fixes into thermal/core as often as possible.

That will help to have a more up to date branch, simplify the patch
submission path and reduce the latency for the merge windows.

If you need help, I can take care of applying the fixes only and merge
them to thermal/next.

That is how the tip subsystem works, Peter Ziljstra, Ingo Molnar, Thomas
Gleixner, have all permissions to commit in the tip tree but they take
care of their subsystems. If one is away for vacations or whatever,
someone else can take over during the absence.





>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
>> Sent: 2018??11??21?? 16:44
>> To: Andy Tang <[email protected]>; [email protected];
>> [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
>>
>> On 21/11/2018 02:34, Andy Tang wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Do you have any comments on this patch?
>>>
>>> I found for our thermal driver(qoriq_thermal.c) there are different
>> between the following two git trees:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux.git
>>> branch: next
>>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal.gi
>> t.
>>> branch: next
>>>
>>> Could you please clarify which git tree/branch should I use?
>>
>> SoC changes are submitted against linux-soc-thermal.git.
>>
>> Generic thermal framework are sent against Zhang Rui's tree but it
>> happens sometimes Eduardo pick them also when the changes are related
>> to SoC behavior.
>>
>> However, I agree that can be confusing :)
>>
>> Eduardo, Rui,
>>
>> how about to add a section in the maintainer handbook for the thermal to
>> clarify the expectations and the flow?
>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Andy Tang
>>>> Sent: 2018??11??14?? 15:29
>>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
>>>>
>>>> PING.
>>>>
>>>> BR,
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>>>> Sent: 2018??10??30?? 9:00
>>>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>>>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
>>>>> [email protected]; Andy Tang <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>> The QorIQ Layerscape SoC has several thermal sensors but the
>> current
>>>>> driver only supports one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Massage the code to be sensor oriented and allow the support for
>>>>> multiple sensors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> v3:
>>>>> - add Reviewed-by
>>>>> v2:
>>>>> - update the commit message
>>>>> - refine the qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone()
>>>>>
>>>>> drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 100
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>>>> 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
>>>>> b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c index 450ed66..8beb344 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
>>>>> @@ -59,14 +59,21 @@ struct qoriq_tmu_regs {
>>>>> u32 ttr3cr; /* Temperature Range 3 Control Register */
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> +struct qoriq_tmu_data;
>>>>> +
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Thermal zone data
>>>>> */
>>>>> +struct qoriq_sensor {
>>>>> + struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
>>>>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata;
>>>>> + int id;
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> struct qoriq_tmu_data {
>>>>> - struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
>>>>> struct qoriq_tmu_regs __iomem *regs;
>>>>> - int sensor_id;
>>>>> bool little_endian;
>>>>> + struct qoriq_sensor *sensor[SITES_MAX];
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> static void tmu_write(struct qoriq_tmu_data *p, u32 val, void
>>>>> __iomem
>>>>> *addr) @@ -87,48 +94,51 @@ static u32 tmu_read(struct
>>>> qoriq_tmu_data
>>>>> *p, void __iomem *addr)
>>>>>
>>>>> static int tmu_get_temp(void *p, int *temp) {
>>>>> + struct qoriq_sensor *qsensor = p;
>>>>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = qsensor->qdata;
>>>>> u32 val;
>>>>> - struct qoriq_tmu_data *data = p;
>>>>>
>>>>> - val = tmu_read(data, &data->regs->site[data->sensor_id].tritsr);
>>>>> + val = tmu_read(qdata, &qdata->regs->site[qsensor->id].tritsr);
>>>>> *temp = (val & 0xff) * 1000;
>>>>>
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> -static int qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id(void)
>>>>> +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
>>>>> + .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static int qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(struct platform_device
>>>>> +*pdev)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - int ret, id;
>>>>> - struct of_phandle_args sensor_specs;
>>>>> - struct device_node *np, *sensor_np;
>>>>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>>> + int id, sites = 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> - np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "thermal-zones");
>>>>> - if (!np)
>>>>> - return -ENODEV;
>>>>> + for (id = 0; id < SITES_MAX; id++) {
>>>>> + qdata->sensor[id] = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>>>>> + sizeof(struct qoriq_sensor), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> + if (!qdata->sensor[id])
>>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>>>
>>>>> - sensor_np = of_get_next_child(np, NULL);
>>>>> - ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(sensor_np,
>> "thermal-sensors",
>>>>> - "#thermal-sensor-cells",
>>>>> - 0, &sensor_specs);
>>>>> - if (ret) {
>>>>> - of_node_put(np);
>>>>> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
>>>>> - return ret;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> + qdata->sensor[id]->id = id;
>>>>> + qdata->sensor[id]->qdata = qdata;
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (sensor_specs.args_count >= 1) {
>>>>> - id = sensor_specs.args[0];
>>>>> - WARN(sensor_specs.args_count > 1,
>>>>> - "%s: too many cells in sensor specifier %d\n",
>>>>> - sensor_specs.np->name,
>> sensor_specs.args_count);
>>>>> - } else {
>>>>> - id = 0;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> + qdata->sensor[id]->tzd =
>>>>> devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(
>>>>> + &pdev->dev, id, qdata->sensor[id], &tmu_tz_ops);
>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd)) {
>>>>> + if (PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd) == -ENODEV)
>>>>> + continue;
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + return PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd);
>>>>>
>>>>> - of_node_put(np);
>>>>> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + sites |= 0x1 << (15 - id);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + /* Enable monitoring */
>>>>> + if (sites != 0)
>>>>> + tmu_write(qdata, sites | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF,
>>>>> &qdata->regs->tmr);
>>>>>
>>>>> - return id;
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct platform_device *pdev) @@
>>>>> -178,16 +188,11 @@ static void qoriq_tmu_init_device(struct
>>>>> qoriq_tmu_data *data)
>>>>> tmu_write(data, TMR_DISABLE, &data->regs->tmr); }
>>>>>
>>>>> -static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
>>>>> - .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
>>>>> -};
>>>>> -
>>>>> static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
>>>>> int ret;
>>>>> struct qoriq_tmu_data *data;
>>>>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>>>> - u32 site;
>>>>>
>>>>> if (!np) {
>>>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device OF-Node is NULL"); @@
>> -203,13
>>>>> +208,6 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>>>>>
>>>>> data->little_endian = of_property_read_bool(np, "little-endian");
>>>>>
>>>>> - data->sensor_id = qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id();
>>>>> - if (data->sensor_id < 0) {
>>>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get sensor id\n");
>>>>> - ret = -ENODEV;
>>>>> - goto err_iomap;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> data->regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
>>>>> if (!data->regs) {
>>>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get memory region\n");
>> @@
>>>>> -223,19 +221,13 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct
>> platform_device
>>>>> *pdev)
>>>>> if (ret < 0)
>>>>> goto err_tmu;
>>>>>
>>>>> - data->tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
>>>>> - data->sensor_id,
>>>>> - data, &tmu_tz_ops);
>>>>> - if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
>>>>> - ret = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
>>>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>>>>> - "Failed to register thermal zone device %d\n", ret);
>>>>> - goto err_tmu;
>>>>> + ret = qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(pdev);
>>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register sensors\n");
>>>>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>>>>> + goto err_iomap;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> - /* Enable monitoring */
>>>>> - site = 0x1 << (15 - data->sensor_id);
>>>>> - tmu_write(data, site | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF, &data->regs->tmr);
>>>>>
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> 1.7.1
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
>> http://www.linaro.org%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40nxp.com%7Ca0
>> d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c
>> 301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=AVw3XdjmiRO
>> XP7Xz7MTNMVgzI8hYG9aWsR02opMZqjM%3D&amp;reserved=0>
>> Linaro.org ?? Open source software for ARM SoCs
>>
>> Follow Linaro:
>> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
>> http://www.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FLinaro&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tan
>> g%40nxp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3b
>> c2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;s
>> data=NM8wm4ri%2F2kdBW0FdCSXrL5ogg6owPfoRGacqm%2BKsEw%3D&a
>> mp;reserved=0> Facebook |
>> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ft
>> witter.com%2F%23!%2Flinaroorg&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40n
>> xp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6
>> fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=
>> Wplqwpisgmqrf3yLhTzdo5O6TvN2Jfu5IjBTvS4xOWk%3D&amp;reserved=0>
>> Twitter |
>> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
>> http://www.linaro.org%2Flinaro-blog%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40
>> nxp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c
>> 6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=I
>> b6KFIP3LNPGuDDb1dpnOllrqAAsc%2BZNCUuJZUPso6k%3D&amp;reserve
>> d=0> Blog
>


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ?? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


2018-11-23 01:49:30

by Zhang, Rui

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support

On 三, 2018-11-21 at 09:43 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 21/11/2018 02:34, Andy Tang wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Do you have any comments on this patch?
> >
> > I found for our thermal driver(qoriq_thermal.c) there are different
> > between the following two git trees:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux.git 
> > branch: next  
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-
> > thermal.git.
> > branch: next
> >
> > Could you please clarify which git tree/branch should I use?
> SoC changes are submitted against linux-soc-thermal.git.
>
> Generic thermal framework are sent against Zhang Rui's tree but it
> happens sometimes Eduardo pick them also when the changes are related
> to
> SoC behavior.
>
> However, I agree that can be confusing :)
>

In the beginning, for soc thermal driver changes, I used to take them
with Acked-by/Reviewed-by from Eduardo or the driver maintainers.
Later, we have Eduardo to take the soc-thermal patches and send me pull
request so that I can merge them altogether before merge window.
Recently, we started to send separate pull requests to see how it goes.

So to make it easier, I agree we'd better stick with one tree.

thanks,
rui

> Eduardo, Rui,
>
> how about to add a section in the maintainer handbook for the thermal
> to
> clarify the expectations and the flow?
>
> >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andy Tang
> > > Sent: 2018年11月14日 15:29
> > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > > [email protected]
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors
> > > support
> > >
> > > PING.
> > >
> > > BR,
> > > Andy
> > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > > > Sent: 2018年10月30日 9:00
> > > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > > > [email protected]; Andy Tang <[email protected]>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors
> > > > support
> > > >
> > > > From: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > The QorIQ Layerscape SoC has several thermal sensors but the
> > > > current
> > > > driver only supports one.
> > > >
> > > > Massage the code to be sensor oriented and allow the support
> > > > for
> > > > multiple sensors.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > v3:
> > > >   - add Reviewed-by
> > > > v2:
> > > >   - update the commit message
> > > >   - refine the qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone()
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c |  100
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > > >  1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > > > b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c index 450ed66..8beb344 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > > > @@ -59,14 +59,21 @@ struct qoriq_tmu_regs {
> > > >   u32 ttr3cr; /* Temperature Range 3
> > > > Control Register */
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > > +struct qoriq_tmu_data;
> > > > +
> > > >  /*
> > > >   * Thermal zone data
> > > >   */
> > > > +struct qoriq_sensor {
> > > > + struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
> > > > + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata;
> > > > + int id;
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > >  struct qoriq_tmu_data {
> > > > - struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> > > >   struct qoriq_tmu_regs __iomem *regs;
> > > > - int sensor_id;
> > > >   bool little_endian;
> > > > + struct qoriq_sensor *sensor[SITES_MAX];
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > >  static void tmu_write(struct qoriq_tmu_data *p, u32 val, void
> > > > __iomem
> > > > *addr) @@ -87,48 +94,51 @@ static u32 tmu_read(struct
> > > qoriq_tmu_data
> > > >
> > > > *p, void __iomem *addr)
> > > >
> > > >  static int tmu_get_temp(void *p, int *temp)  {
> > > > + struct qoriq_sensor *qsensor = p;
> > > > + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = qsensor->qdata;
> > > >   u32 val;
> > > > - struct qoriq_tmu_data *data = p;
> > > >
> > > > - val = tmu_read(data, &data->regs->site[data-
> > > > >sensor_id].tritsr);
> > > > + val = tmu_read(qdata, &qdata->regs->site[qsensor-
> > > > >id].tritsr);
> > > >   *temp = (val & 0xff) * 1000;
> > > >
> > > >   return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > -static int qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id(void)
> > > > +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> > > > + .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +static int qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(struct platform_device
> > > > *pdev)
> > > >  {
> > > > - int ret, id;
> > > > - struct of_phandle_args sensor_specs;
> > > > - struct device_node *np, *sensor_np;
> > > > + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata =
> > > > platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > + int id, sites = 0;
> > > >
> > > > - np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "thermal-zones");
> > > > - if (!np)
> > > > - return -ENODEV;
> > > > + for (id = 0; id < SITES_MAX; id++) {
> > > > + qdata->sensor[id] = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> > > > + sizeof(struct qoriq_sensor),
> > > > GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!qdata->sensor[id])
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > >
> > > > - sensor_np = of_get_next_child(np, NULL);
> > > > - ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(sensor_np, "thermal-
> > > > sensors",
> > > > - "#thermal-sensor-cells",
> > > > - 0, &sensor_specs);
> > > > - if (ret) {
> > > > - of_node_put(np);
> > > > - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> > > > - return ret;
> > > > - }
> > > > + qdata->sensor[id]->id = id;
> > > > + qdata->sensor[id]->qdata = qdata;
> > > >
> > > > - if (sensor_specs.args_count >= 1) {
> > > > - id = sensor_specs.args[0];
> > > > - WARN(sensor_specs.args_count > 1,
> > > > - "%s: too many cells in sensor
> > > > specifier %d\n",
> > > > - sensor_specs.np->name,
> > > > sensor_specs.args_count);
> > > > - } else {
> > > > - id = 0;
> > > > - }
> > > > + qdata->sensor[id]->tzd =
> > > > devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(
> > > > + &pdev->dev, id, qdata-
> > > > >sensor[id], &tmu_tz_ops);
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd)) {
> > > > + if (PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd) ==
> > > > -ENODEV)
> > > > + continue;
> > > > + else
> > > > + return PTR_ERR(qdata-
> > > > >sensor[id]->tzd);
> > > >
> > > > - of_node_put(np);
> > > > - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + sites |= 0x1 << (15 - id);
> > > > + }
> > > > + /* Enable monitoring */
> > > > + if (sites != 0)
> > > > + tmu_write(qdata, sites | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF,
> > > > &qdata->regs->tmr);
> > > >
> > > > - return id;
> > > > + return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > @@
> > > > -178,16 +188,11 @@ static void qoriq_tmu_init_device(struct
> > > > qoriq_tmu_data *data)
> > > >   tmu_write(data, TMR_DISABLE, &data->regs->tmr);  }
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> > > > - .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> > > > -};
> > > > -
> > > >  static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)  {
> > > >   int ret;
> > > >   struct qoriq_tmu_data *data;
> > > >   struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > > > - u32 site;
> > > >
> > > >   if (!np) {
> > > >   dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device OF-Node is NULL");
> > > > @@ -203,13
> > > > +208,6 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device
> > > > *pdev)
> > > >
> > > >   data->little_endian = of_property_read_bool(np,
> > > > "little-endian");
> > > >
> > > > - data->sensor_id = qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id();
> > > > - if (data->sensor_id < 0) {
> > > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get sensor
> > > > id\n");
> > > > - ret = -ENODEV;
> > > > - goto err_iomap;
> > > > - }
> > > > -
> > > >   data->regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
> > > >   if (!data->regs) {
> > > >   dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get memory
> > > > region\n"); @@
> > > > -223,19 +221,13 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct
> > > > platform_device
> > > > *pdev)
> > > >   if (ret < 0)
> > > >   goto err_tmu;
> > > >
> > > > - data->tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev-
> > > > >dev,
> > > > - data-
> > > > >sensor_id,
> > > > - data,
> > > > &tmu_tz_ops);
> > > > - if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
> > > > - ret = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
> > > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > > > - "Failed to register thermal zone
> > > > device %d\n", ret);
> > > > - goto err_tmu;
> > > > + ret = qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(pdev);
> > > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register
> > > > sensors\n");
> > > > + ret = -ENODEV;
> > > > + goto err_iomap;
> > > >   }
> > > >
> > > > - /* Enable monitoring */
> > > > - site = 0x1 << (15 - data->sensor_id);
> > > > - tmu_write(data, site | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF, &data->regs-
> > > > >tmr);
> > > >
> > > >   return 0;
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 1.7.1
>

2018-11-29 17:19:11

by Eduardo Valentin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 09:16:08AM +0000, Andy Tang wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for your explanation. The problem is these two trees are not synced well.
> Let's take our driver(qoriq_thermal.c) for example.
>
> Git log on Rui's tree next branch:
> 2dfef65 thermal: qoriq: Switch to SPDX identifier
> 1a893a5 thermal: qoriq: Simplify the 'site' variable assignment
> f1506a6 thermal: qoriq: Use devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
> c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
> 0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
> 4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
>
> Git log on linux-soc-thermal tree branch next:
> 6017e2a thermal: qoriq: add i.mx8mq support
> 9b96566 thermal: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
> c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
> 0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
> 4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
>
> You can see that the first 2-3 commits on these two tress are different.
>
> The strange thing is they seems sync well on Linus' tree:
> 0ef7791 Merge branch 'linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal
> 6017e2a thermal: qoriq: add i.mx8mq support
> 9b96566 thermal: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
> 2dfef65 thermal: qoriq: Switch to SPDX identifier
> 1a893a5 thermal: qoriq: Simplify the 'site' variable assignment
> f1506a6 thermal: qoriq: Use devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
> c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
> 0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
> 4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
>
> Currently my patch was created based on Run's tree, probably I should rebase it to soc tree.
> But whichever tree I use, it can't be merged to Linus' tree without conflict.

I agree that trees out of sync does not help. However the idea was to
have then separate, since couple of merge windows ago. But I believe the issue
here is that we do not have some sort of cookbook describing the
subsystem process.

I will work on describing it and sending a patch to have it documented.

>
> Something I missed?
>
> BR,
> Andy
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
> > Sent: 2018年11月21日 16:44
> > To: Andy Tang <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> > [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
> >
> > On 21/11/2018 02:34, Andy Tang wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Do you have any comments on this patch?
> > >
> > > I found for our thermal driver(qoriq_thermal.c) there are different
> > between the following two git trees:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux.git
> > > branch: next
> > >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal.gi
> > t.
> > > branch: next
> > >
> > > Could you please clarify which git tree/branch should I use?
> >
> > SoC changes are submitted against linux-soc-thermal.git.
> >
> > Generic thermal framework are sent against Zhang Rui's tree but it
> > happens sometimes Eduardo pick them also when the changes are related
> > to SoC behavior.
> >
> > However, I agree that can be confusing :)
> >
> > Eduardo, Rui,
> >
> > how about to add a section in the maintainer handbook for the thermal to
> > clarify the expectations and the flow?
> >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Andy Tang
> > >> Sent: 2018年11月14日 15:29
> > >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
> > >>
> > >> PING.
> > >>
> > >> BR,
> > >> Andy
> > >>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > >>> Sent: 2018年10月30日 9:00
> > >>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > >>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > >>> [email protected]; Andy Tang <[email protected]>
> > >>> Subject: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
> > >>>
> > >>> From: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
> > >>>
> > >>> The QorIQ Layerscape SoC has several thermal sensors but the
> > current
> > >>> driver only supports one.
> > >>>
> > >>> Massage the code to be sensor oriented and allow the support for
> > >>> multiple sensors.
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
> > >>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
> > >>> ---
> > >>> v3:
> > >>> - add Reviewed-by
> > >>> v2:
> > >>> - update the commit message
> > >>> - refine the qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone()
> > >>>
> > >>> drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 100
> > >>> ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > >>> 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > >>> b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c index 450ed66..8beb344 100644
> > >>> --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > >>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > >>> @@ -59,14 +59,21 @@ struct qoriq_tmu_regs {
> > >>> u32 ttr3cr; /* Temperature Range 3 Control Register */
> > >>> };
> > >>>
> > >>> +struct qoriq_tmu_data;
> > >>> +
> > >>> /*
> > >>> * Thermal zone data
> > >>> */
> > >>> +struct qoriq_sensor {
> > >>> + struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
> > >>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata;
> > >>> + int id;
> > >>> +};
> > >>> +
> > >>> struct qoriq_tmu_data {
> > >>> - struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> > >>> struct qoriq_tmu_regs __iomem *regs;
> > >>> - int sensor_id;
> > >>> bool little_endian;
> > >>> + struct qoriq_sensor *sensor[SITES_MAX];
> > >>> };
> > >>>
> > >>> static void tmu_write(struct qoriq_tmu_data *p, u32 val, void
> > >>> __iomem
> > >>> *addr) @@ -87,48 +94,51 @@ static u32 tmu_read(struct
> > >> qoriq_tmu_data
> > >>> *p, void __iomem *addr)
> > >>>
> > >>> static int tmu_get_temp(void *p, int *temp) {
> > >>> + struct qoriq_sensor *qsensor = p;
> > >>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = qsensor->qdata;
> > >>> u32 val;
> > >>> - struct qoriq_tmu_data *data = p;
> > >>>
> > >>> - val = tmu_read(data, &data->regs->site[data->sensor_id].tritsr);
> > >>> + val = tmu_read(qdata, &qdata->regs->site[qsensor->id].tritsr);
> > >>> *temp = (val & 0xff) * 1000;
> > >>>
> > >>> return 0;
> > >>> }
> > >>>
> > >>> -static int qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id(void)
> > >>> +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> > >>> + .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> > >>> +};
> > >>> +
> > >>> +static int qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(struct platform_device
> > >>> +*pdev)
> > >>> {
> > >>> - int ret, id;
> > >>> - struct of_phandle_args sensor_specs;
> > >>> - struct device_node *np, *sensor_np;
> > >>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > >>> + int id, sites = 0;
> > >>>
> > >>> - np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "thermal-zones");
> > >>> - if (!np)
> > >>> - return -ENODEV;
> > >>> + for (id = 0; id < SITES_MAX; id++) {
> > >>> + qdata->sensor[id] = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> > >>> + sizeof(struct qoriq_sensor), GFP_KERNEL);
> > >>> + if (!qdata->sensor[id])
> > >>> + return -ENOMEM;
> > >>>
> > >>> - sensor_np = of_get_next_child(np, NULL);
> > >>> - ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(sensor_np,
> > "thermal-sensors",
> > >>> - "#thermal-sensor-cells",
> > >>> - 0, &sensor_specs);
> > >>> - if (ret) {
> > >>> - of_node_put(np);
> > >>> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> > >>> - return ret;
> > >>> - }
> > >>> + qdata->sensor[id]->id = id;
> > >>> + qdata->sensor[id]->qdata = qdata;
> > >>>
> > >>> - if (sensor_specs.args_count >= 1) {
> > >>> - id = sensor_specs.args[0];
> > >>> - WARN(sensor_specs.args_count > 1,
> > >>> - "%s: too many cells in sensor specifier %d\n",
> > >>> - sensor_specs.np->name,
> > sensor_specs.args_count);
> > >>> - } else {
> > >>> - id = 0;
> > >>> - }
> > >>> + qdata->sensor[id]->tzd =
> > >>> devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(
> > >>> + &pdev->dev, id, qdata->sensor[id], &tmu_tz_ops);
> > >>> + if (IS_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd)) {
> > >>> + if (PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd) == -ENODEV)
> > >>> + continue;
> > >>> + else
> > >>> + return PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd);
> > >>>
> > >>> - of_node_put(np);
> > >>> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> > >>> + }
> > >>> +
> > >>> + sites |= 0x1 << (15 - id);
> > >>> + }
> > >>> + /* Enable monitoring */
> > >>> + if (sites != 0)
> > >>> + tmu_write(qdata, sites | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF,
> > >>> &qdata->regs->tmr);
> > >>>
> > >>> - return id;
> > >>> + return 0;
> > >>> }
> > >>>
> > >>> static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct platform_device *pdev) @@
> > >>> -178,16 +188,11 @@ static void qoriq_tmu_init_device(struct
> > >>> qoriq_tmu_data *data)
> > >>> tmu_write(data, TMR_DISABLE, &data->regs->tmr); }
> > >>>
> > >>> -static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> > >>> - .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> > >>> -};
> > >>> -
> > >>> static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > >>> int ret;
> > >>> struct qoriq_tmu_data *data;
> > >>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > >>> - u32 site;
> > >>>
> > >>> if (!np) {
> > >>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device OF-Node is NULL"); @@
> > -203,13
> > >>> +208,6 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > >>>
> > >>> data->little_endian = of_property_read_bool(np, "little-endian");
> > >>>
> > >>> - data->sensor_id = qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id();
> > >>> - if (data->sensor_id < 0) {
> > >>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get sensor id\n");
> > >>> - ret = -ENODEV;
> > >>> - goto err_iomap;
> > >>> - }
> > >>> -
> > >>> data->regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
> > >>> if (!data->regs) {
> > >>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get memory region\n");
> > @@
> > >>> -223,19 +221,13 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct
> > platform_device
> > >>> *pdev)
> > >>> if (ret < 0)
> > >>> goto err_tmu;
> > >>>
> > >>> - data->tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
> > >>> - data->sensor_id,
> > >>> - data, &tmu_tz_ops);
> > >>> - if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
> > >>> - ret = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
> > >>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > >>> - "Failed to register thermal zone device %d\n", ret);
> > >>> - goto err_tmu;
> > >>> + ret = qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(pdev);
> > >>> + if (ret < 0) {
> > >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register sensors\n");
> > >>> + ret = -ENODEV;
> > >>> + goto err_iomap;
> > >>> }
> > >>>
> > >>> - /* Enable monitoring */
> > >>> - site = 0x1 << (15 - data->sensor_id);
> > >>> - tmu_write(data, site | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF, &data->regs->tmr);
> > >>>
> > >>> return 0;
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> 1.7.1
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> > http://www.linaro.org%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40nxp.com%7Ca0
> > d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c
> > 301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=AVw3XdjmiRO
> > XP7Xz7MTNMVgzI8hYG9aWsR02opMZqjM%3D&amp;reserved=0>
> > Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> >
> > Follow Linaro:
> > <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> > http://www.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FLinaro&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tan
> > g%40nxp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3b
> > c2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;s
> > data=NM8wm4ri%2F2kdBW0FdCSXrL5ogg6owPfoRGacqm%2BKsEw%3D&a
> > mp;reserved=0> Facebook |
> > <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ft
> > witter.com%2F%23!%2Flinaroorg&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40n
> > xp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6
> > fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=
> > Wplqwpisgmqrf3yLhTzdo5O6TvN2Jfu5IjBTvS4xOWk%3D&amp;reserved=0>
> > Twitter |
> > <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> > http://www.linaro.org%2Flinaro-blog%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40
> > nxp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c
> > 6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=I
> > b6KFIP3LNPGuDDb1dpnOllrqAAsc%2BZNCUuJZUPso6k%3D&amp;reserve
> > d=0> Blog
>

2018-11-29 17:24:51

by Eduardo Valentin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 10:41:36AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 21/11/2018 10:16, Andy Tang wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Thanks for your explanation. The problem is these two trees are not synced well.
> > Let's take our driver(qoriq_thermal.c) for example.
> >
> > Git log on Rui's tree next branch:
> > 2dfef65 thermal: qoriq: Switch to SPDX identifier
> > 1a893a5 thermal: qoriq: Simplify the 'site' variable assignment
> > f1506a6 thermal: qoriq: Use devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
> > c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
> > 0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
> > 4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
> >
> > Git log on linux-soc-thermal tree branch next:
> > 6017e2a thermal: qoriq: add i.mx8mq support
> > 9b96566 thermal: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
> > c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
> > 0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
> > 4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
> >
> > You can see that the first 2-3 commits on these two tress are different.
> >
> > The strange thing is they seems sync well on Linus' tree:
> > 0ef7791 Merge branch 'linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal
> > 6017e2a thermal: qoriq: add i.mx8mq support
> > 9b96566 thermal: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
> > 2dfef65 thermal: qoriq: Switch to SPDX identifier
> > 1a893a5 thermal: qoriq: Simplify the 'site' variable assignment
> > f1506a6 thermal: qoriq: Use devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
> > c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
> > 0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
> > 4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
> >
> > Currently my patch was created based on Run's tree, probably I should rebase it to soc tree.
> > But whichever tree I use, it can't be merged to Linus' tree without conflict.
> >
> > Something I missed?
>
> No.
>
> Eduardo, Rui,
>
> why not create a 'thermal' group ala 'tip' group with a single tree and
> two branches:
>
> thermal/next
> thermal/fixes
>
> - Rui takes the core changes.
> - Eduardo takes the SoC changes.
>
> - Both commit to thermal/next
> - Both commit to thermal/fixes
> - Both merge thermal/fixes into thermal/core as often as possible.
>
> That will help to have a more up to date branch, simplify the patch
> submission path and reduce the latency for the merge windows.
>
> If you need help, I can take care of applying the fixes only and merge
> them to thermal/next.
>
> That is how the tip subsystem works, Peter Ziljstra, Ingo Molnar, Thomas
> Gleixner, have all permissions to commit in the tip tree but they take
> care of their subsystems. If one is away for vacations or whatever,
> someone else can take over during the absence.
>

Yeah, that is a setup people have been following. It does not
necessarily mean it will work for all cases though.

I believe regardless of process and tree setup what we are lacking here
is a documentation of how things are being done.

As I mentioned, I will work on writing something up to document at
least what we have today before any change in process gets in place.

>
>
>
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: 2018年11月21日 16:44
> >> To: Andy Tang <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> >> [email protected]
> >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
> >>
> >> On 21/11/2018 02:34, Andy Tang wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Do you have any comments on this patch?
> >>>
> >>> I found for our thermal driver(qoriq_thermal.c) there are different
> >> between the following two git trees:
> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux.git
> >>> branch: next
> >>>
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal.gi
> >> t.
> >>> branch: next
> >>>
> >>> Could you please clarify which git tree/branch should I use?
> >>
> >> SoC changes are submitted against linux-soc-thermal.git.
> >>
> >> Generic thermal framework are sent against Zhang Rui's tree but it
> >> happens sometimes Eduardo pick them also when the changes are related
> >> to SoC behavior.
> >>
> >> However, I agree that can be confusing :)
> >>
> >> Eduardo, Rui,
> >>
> >> how about to add a section in the maintainer handbook for the thermal to
> >> clarify the expectations and the flow?
> >>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Andy Tang
> >>>> Sent: 2018年11月14日 15:29
> >>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> >>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
> >>>>
> >>>> PING.
> >>>>
> >>>> BR,
> >>>> Andy
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Sent: 2018年10月30日 9:00
> >>>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> >>>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> >>>>> [email protected]; Andy Tang <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Subject: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The QorIQ Layerscape SoC has several thermal sensors but the
> >> current
> >>>>> driver only supports one.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Massage the code to be sensor oriented and allow the support for
> >>>>> multiple sensors.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> v3:
> >>>>> - add Reviewed-by
> >>>>> v2:
> >>>>> - update the commit message
> >>>>> - refine the qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone()
> >>>>>
> >>>>> drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 100
> >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >>>>> 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> >>>>> b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c index 450ed66..8beb344 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> >>>>> @@ -59,14 +59,21 @@ struct qoriq_tmu_regs {
> >>>>> u32 ttr3cr; /* Temperature Range 3 Control Register */
> >>>>> };
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +struct qoriq_tmu_data;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> /*
> >>>>> * Thermal zone data
> >>>>> */
> >>>>> +struct qoriq_sensor {
> >>>>> + struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
> >>>>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata;
> >>>>> + int id;
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> struct qoriq_tmu_data {
> >>>>> - struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> >>>>> struct qoriq_tmu_regs __iomem *regs;
> >>>>> - int sensor_id;
> >>>>> bool little_endian;
> >>>>> + struct qoriq_sensor *sensor[SITES_MAX];
> >>>>> };
> >>>>>
> >>>>> static void tmu_write(struct qoriq_tmu_data *p, u32 val, void
> >>>>> __iomem
> >>>>> *addr) @@ -87,48 +94,51 @@ static u32 tmu_read(struct
> >>>> qoriq_tmu_data
> >>>>> *p, void __iomem *addr)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> static int tmu_get_temp(void *p, int *temp) {
> >>>>> + struct qoriq_sensor *qsensor = p;
> >>>>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = qsensor->qdata;
> >>>>> u32 val;
> >>>>> - struct qoriq_tmu_data *data = p;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - val = tmu_read(data, &data->regs->site[data->sensor_id].tritsr);
> >>>>> + val = tmu_read(qdata, &qdata->regs->site[qsensor->id].tritsr);
> >>>>> *temp = (val & 0xff) * 1000;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> return 0;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -static int qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id(void)
> >>>>> +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> >>>>> + .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +static int qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(struct platform_device
> >>>>> +*pdev)
> >>>>> {
> >>>>> - int ret, id;
> >>>>> - struct of_phandle_args sensor_specs;
> >>>>> - struct device_node *np, *sensor_np;
> >>>>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >>>>> + int id, sites = 0;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "thermal-zones");
> >>>>> - if (!np)
> >>>>> - return -ENODEV;
> >>>>> + for (id = 0; id < SITES_MAX; id++) {
> >>>>> + qdata->sensor[id] = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> >>>>> + sizeof(struct qoriq_sensor), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>> + if (!qdata->sensor[id])
> >>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - sensor_np = of_get_next_child(np, NULL);
> >>>>> - ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(sensor_np,
> >> "thermal-sensors",
> >>>>> - "#thermal-sensor-cells",
> >>>>> - 0, &sensor_specs);
> >>>>> - if (ret) {
> >>>>> - of_node_put(np);
> >>>>> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> >>>>> - return ret;
> >>>>> - }
> >>>>> + qdata->sensor[id]->id = id;
> >>>>> + qdata->sensor[id]->qdata = qdata;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - if (sensor_specs.args_count >= 1) {
> >>>>> - id = sensor_specs.args[0];
> >>>>> - WARN(sensor_specs.args_count > 1,
> >>>>> - "%s: too many cells in sensor specifier %d\n",
> >>>>> - sensor_specs.np->name,
> >> sensor_specs.args_count);
> >>>>> - } else {
> >>>>> - id = 0;
> >>>>> - }
> >>>>> + qdata->sensor[id]->tzd =
> >>>>> devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(
> >>>>> + &pdev->dev, id, qdata->sensor[id], &tmu_tz_ops);
> >>>>> + if (IS_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd)) {
> >>>>> + if (PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd) == -ENODEV)
> >>>>> + continue;
> >>>>> + else
> >>>>> + return PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - of_node_put(np);
> >>>>> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + sites |= 0x1 << (15 - id);
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> + /* Enable monitoring */
> >>>>> + if (sites != 0)
> >>>>> + tmu_write(qdata, sites | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF,
> >>>>> &qdata->regs->tmr);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - return id;
> >>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct platform_device *pdev) @@
> >>>>> -178,16 +188,11 @@ static void qoriq_tmu_init_device(struct
> >>>>> qoriq_tmu_data *data)
> >>>>> tmu_write(data, TMR_DISABLE, &data->regs->tmr); }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> >>>>> - .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> >>>>> -};
> >>>>> -
> >>>>> static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> >>>>> int ret;
> >>>>> struct qoriq_tmu_data *data;
> >>>>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> >>>>> - u32 site;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if (!np) {
> >>>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device OF-Node is NULL"); @@
> >> -203,13
> >>>>> +208,6 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device
> >> *pdev)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> data->little_endian = of_property_read_bool(np, "little-endian");
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - data->sensor_id = qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id();
> >>>>> - if (data->sensor_id < 0) {
> >>>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get sensor id\n");
> >>>>> - ret = -ENODEV;
> >>>>> - goto err_iomap;
> >>>>> - }
> >>>>> -
> >>>>> data->regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
> >>>>> if (!data->regs) {
> >>>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get memory region\n");
> >> @@
> >>>>> -223,19 +221,13 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct
> >> platform_device
> >>>>> *pdev)
> >>>>> if (ret < 0)
> >>>>> goto err_tmu;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - data->tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
> >>>>> - data->sensor_id,
> >>>>> - data, &tmu_tz_ops);
> >>>>> - if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
> >>>>> - ret = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
> >>>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> >>>>> - "Failed to register thermal zone device %d\n", ret);
> >>>>> - goto err_tmu;
> >>>>> + ret = qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(pdev);
> >>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
> >>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register sensors\n");
> >>>>> + ret = -ENODEV;
> >>>>> + goto err_iomap;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - /* Enable monitoring */
> >>>>> - site = 0x1 << (15 - data->sensor_id);
> >>>>> - tmu_write(data, site | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF, &data->regs->tmr);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> return 0;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> 1.7.1
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> >> http://www.linaro.org%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40nxp.com%7Ca0
> >> d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c
> >> 301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=AVw3XdjmiRO
> >> XP7Xz7MTNMVgzI8hYG9aWsR02opMZqjM%3D&amp;reserved=0>
> >> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> >>
> >> Follow Linaro:
> >> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> >> http://www.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FLinaro&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tan
> >> g%40nxp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3b
> >> c2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;s
> >> data=NM8wm4ri%2F2kdBW0FdCSXrL5ogg6owPfoRGacqm%2BKsEw%3D&a
> >> mp;reserved=0> Facebook |
> >> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ft
> >> witter.com%2F%23!%2Flinaroorg&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40n
> >> xp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6
> >> fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=
> >> Wplqwpisgmqrf3yLhTzdo5O6TvN2Jfu5IjBTvS4xOWk%3D&amp;reserved=0>
> >> Twitter |
> >> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> >> http://www.linaro.org%2Flinaro-blog%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40
> >> nxp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c
> >> 6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=I
> >> b6KFIP3LNPGuDDb1dpnOllrqAAsc%2BZNCUuJZUPso6k%3D&amp;reserve
> >> d=0> Blog
> >
>
>
> --
> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
>

2018-12-12 02:46:11

by Andy Tang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]>
> Sent: 2018年11月30日 1:21
> To: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andy Tang <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 10:41:36AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 21/11/2018 10:16, Andy Tang wrote:
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your explanation. The problem is these two trees are not synced
> well.
> > > Let's take our driver(qoriq_thermal.c) for example.
> > >
> > > Git log on Rui's tree next branch:
> > > 2dfef65 thermal: qoriq: Switch to SPDX identifier
> > > 1a893a5 thermal: qoriq: Simplify the 'site' variable assignment
> > > f1506a6 thermal: qoriq: Use devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
> > > c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops
> > > structures
> > > 0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for
> > > of_thermal_get_trip_points()
> > > 4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
> > >
> > > Git log on linux-soc-thermal tree branch next:
> > > 6017e2a thermal: qoriq: add i.mx8mq support
> > > 9b96566 thermal: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
> > > c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops
> > > structures
> > > 0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for
> > > of_thermal_get_trip_points()
> > > 4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
> > >
> > > You can see that the first 2-3 commits on these two tress are different.
> > >
> > > The strange thing is they seems sync well on Linus' tree:
> > > 0ef7791 Merge branch 'linus' of
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-the
> > > rmal 6017e2a thermal: qoriq: add i.mx8mq support
> > > 9b96566 thermal: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
> > > 2dfef65 thermal: qoriq: Switch to SPDX identifier
> > > 1a893a5 thermal: qoriq: Simplify the 'site' variable assignment
> > > f1506a6 thermal: qoriq: Use devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
> > > c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops
> > > structures
> > > 0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for
> > > of_thermal_get_trip_points()
> > > 4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
> > >
> > > Currently my patch was created based on Run's tree, probably I should
> rebase it to soc tree.
> > > But whichever tree I use, it can't be merged to Linus' tree without conflict.
> > >
> > > Something I missed?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > Eduardo, Rui,
> >
> > why not create a 'thermal' group ala 'tip' group with a single tree
> > and two branches:
> >
> > thermal/next
> > thermal/fixes
> >
> > - Rui takes the core changes.
> > - Eduardo takes the SoC changes.
> >
> > - Both commit to thermal/next
> > - Both commit to thermal/fixes
> > - Both merge thermal/fixes into thermal/core as often as possible.
> >
> > That will help to have a more up to date branch, simplify the patch
> > submission path and reduce the latency for the merge windows.
> >
> > If you need help, I can take care of applying the fixes only and merge
> > them to thermal/next.
> >
> > That is how the tip subsystem works, Peter Ziljstra, Ingo Molnar,
> > Thomas Gleixner, have all permissions to commit in the tip tree but
> > they take care of their subsystems. If one is away for vacations or
> > whatever, someone else can take over during the absence.
> >
>
> Yeah, that is a setup people have been following. It does not necessarily mean
> it will work for all cases though.
>
> I believe regardless of process and tree setup what we are lacking here is a
> documentation of how things are being done.
>
> As I mentioned, I will work on writing something up to document at least what
> we have today before any change in process gets in place.
>
[Andy] Besides the document, what about this patch? Could it be merged before the document is ready?

BR,
Andy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
> > >> Sent: 2018年11月21日 16:44
> > >> To: Andy Tang <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors
> > >> support
> > >>
> > >> On 21/11/2018 02:34, Andy Tang wrote:
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> Do you have any comments on this patch?
> > >>>
> > >>> I found for our thermal driver(qoriq_thermal.c) there are
> > >>> different
> > >> between the following two git trees:
> > >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux.git
> > >>> branch: next
> > >>>
> > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-th
> > >> ermal.gi
> > >> t.
> > >>> branch: next
> > >>>
> > >>> Could you please clarify which git tree/branch should I use?
> > >>
> > >> SoC changes are submitted against linux-soc-thermal.git.
> > >>
> > >> Generic thermal framework are sent against Zhang Rui's tree but it
> > >> happens sometimes Eduardo pick them also when the changes are
> > >> related to SoC behavior.
> > >>
> > >> However, I agree that can be confusing :)
> > >>
> > >> Eduardo, Rui,
> > >>
> > >> how about to add a section in the maintainer handbook for the
> > >> thermal to clarify the expectations and the flow?
> > >>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: Andy Tang
> > >>>> Sent: 2018年11月14日 15:29
> > >>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > >>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > >>>> [email protected]
> > >>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors
> > >>>> support
> > >>>>
> > >>>> PING.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> BR,
> > >>>> Andy
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > >>>>> Sent: 2018年10月30日 9:00
> > >>>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > >>>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > >>>>> [email protected]; Andy Tang <[email protected]>
> > >>>>> Subject: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> From: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The QorIQ Layerscape SoC has several thermal sensors but the
> > >> current
> > >>>>> driver only supports one.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Massage the code to be sensor oriented and allow the support for
> > >>>>> multiple sensors.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Yuantian Tang <[email protected]>
> > >>>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
> > >>>>> ---
> > >>>>> v3:
> > >>>>> - add Reviewed-by
> > >>>>> v2:
> > >>>>> - update the commit message
> > >>>>> - refine the qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone()
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 100
> > >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > >>>>> 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > >>>>> b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c index 450ed66..8beb344 100644
> > >>>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > >>>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > >>>>> @@ -59,14 +59,21 @@ struct qoriq_tmu_regs {
> > >>>>> u32 ttr3cr; /* Temperature Range 3 Control Register */
> > >>>>> };
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> +struct qoriq_tmu_data;
> > >>>>> +
> > >>>>> /*
> > >>>>> * Thermal zone data
> > >>>>> */
> > >>>>> +struct qoriq_sensor {
> > >>>>> + struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
> > >>>>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata;
> > >>>>> + int id;
> > >>>>> +};
> > >>>>> +
> > >>>>> struct qoriq_tmu_data {
> > >>>>> - struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> > >>>>> struct qoriq_tmu_regs __iomem *regs;
> > >>>>> - int sensor_id;
> > >>>>> bool little_endian;
> > >>>>> + struct qoriq_sensor *sensor[SITES_MAX];
> > >>>>> };
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> static void tmu_write(struct qoriq_tmu_data *p, u32 val, void
> > >>>>> __iomem
> > >>>>> *addr) @@ -87,48 +94,51 @@ static u32 tmu_read(struct
> > >>>> qoriq_tmu_data
> > >>>>> *p, void __iomem *addr)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> static int tmu_get_temp(void *p, int *temp) {
> > >>>>> + struct qoriq_sensor *qsensor = p;
> > >>>>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = qsensor->qdata;
> > >>>>> u32 val;
> > >>>>> - struct qoriq_tmu_data *data = p;
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - val = tmu_read(data, &data->regs->site[data->sensor_id].tritsr);
> > >>>>> + val = tmu_read(qdata, &qdata->regs->site[qsensor->id].tritsr);
> > >>>>> *temp = (val & 0xff) * 1000;
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> return 0;
> > >>>>> }
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -static int qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id(void)
> > >>>>> +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> > >>>>> + .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> > >>>>> +};
> > >>>>> +
> > >>>>> +static int qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(struct platform_device
> > >>>>> +*pdev)
> > >>>>> {
> > >>>>> - int ret, id;
> > >>>>> - struct of_phandle_args sensor_specs;
> > >>>>> - struct device_node *np, *sensor_np;
> > >>>>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > >>>>> + int id, sites = 0;
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "thermal-zones");
> > >>>>> - if (!np)
> > >>>>> - return -ENODEV;
> > >>>>> + for (id = 0; id < SITES_MAX; id++) {
> > >>>>> + qdata->sensor[id] = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> > >>>>> + sizeof(struct qoriq_sensor), GFP_KERNEL);
> > >>>>> + if (!qdata->sensor[id])
> > >>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - sensor_np = of_get_next_child(np, NULL);
> > >>>>> - ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(sensor_np,
> > >> "thermal-sensors",
> > >>>>> - "#thermal-sensor-cells",
> > >>>>> - 0, &sensor_specs);
> > >>>>> - if (ret) {
> > >>>>> - of_node_put(np);
> > >>>>> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> > >>>>> - return ret;
> > >>>>> - }
> > >>>>> + qdata->sensor[id]->id = id;
> > >>>>> + qdata->sensor[id]->qdata = qdata;
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - if (sensor_specs.args_count >= 1) {
> > >>>>> - id = sensor_specs.args[0];
> > >>>>> - WARN(sensor_specs.args_count > 1,
> > >>>>> - "%s: too many cells in sensor specifier %d\n",
> > >>>>> - sensor_specs.np->name,
> > >> sensor_specs.args_count);
> > >>>>> - } else {
> > >>>>> - id = 0;
> > >>>>> - }
> > >>>>> + qdata->sensor[id]->tzd =
> > >>>>> devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(
> > >>>>> + &pdev->dev, id, qdata->sensor[id], &tmu_tz_ops);
> > >>>>> + if (IS_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd)) {
> > >>>>> + if (PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd) == -ENODEV)
> > >>>>> + continue;
> > >>>>> + else
> > >>>>> + return PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd);
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - of_node_put(np);
> > >>>>> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> > >>>>> + }
> > >>>>> +
> > >>>>> + sites |= 0x1 << (15 - id);
> > >>>>> + }
> > >>>>> + /* Enable monitoring */
> > >>>>> + if (sites != 0)
> > >>>>> + tmu_write(qdata, sites | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF,
> > >>>>> &qdata->regs->tmr);
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - return id;
> > >>>>> + return 0;
> > >>>>> }
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >>>>> @@
> > >>>>> -178,16 +188,11 @@ static void qoriq_tmu_init_device(struct
> > >>>>> qoriq_tmu_data *data)
> > >>>>> tmu_write(data, TMR_DISABLE, &data->regs->tmr); }
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> > >>>>> - .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> > >>>>> -};
> > >>>>> -
> > >>>>> static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > >>>>> int ret;
> > >>>>> struct qoriq_tmu_data *data;
> > >>>>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > >>>>> - u32 site;
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> if (!np) {
> > >>>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device OF-Node is NULL"); @@
> > >> -203,13
> > >>>>> +208,6 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device
> > >> *pdev)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> data->little_endian = of_property_read_bool(np,
> > >>>>> "little-endian");
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - data->sensor_id = qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id();
> > >>>>> - if (data->sensor_id < 0) {
> > >>>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get sensor id\n");
> > >>>>> - ret = -ENODEV;
> > >>>>> - goto err_iomap;
> > >>>>> - }
> > >>>>> -
> > >>>>> data->regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
> > >>>>> if (!data->regs) {
> > >>>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get memory region\n");
> > >> @@
> > >>>>> -223,19 +221,13 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct
> > >> platform_device
> > >>>>> *pdev)
> > >>>>> if (ret < 0)
> > >>>>> goto err_tmu;
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - data->tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
> > >>>>> - data->sensor_id,
> > >>>>> - data, &tmu_tz_ops);
> > >>>>> - if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
> > >>>>> - ret = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
> > >>>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > >>>>> - "Failed to register thermal zone device %d\n", ret);
> > >>>>> - goto err_tmu;
> > >>>>> + ret = qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(pdev);
> > >>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
> > >>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register sensors\n");
> > >>>>> + ret = -ENODEV;
> > >>>>> + goto err_iomap;
> > >>>>> }
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - /* Enable monitoring */
> > >>>>> - site = 0x1 << (15 - data->sensor_id);
> > >>>>> - tmu_write(data, site | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF, &data->regs->tmr);
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> return 0;
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> 1.7.1
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> > >> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.linaro.org
> > >>
> &amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40nxp.com%7C523c8a2809a34f57700808d
> 65
> > >>
> 61f0575%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636791088572
> 03
> > >>
> 0840&amp;sdata=XV0I9%2B3FctUSF%2BDAqRVEWGk8ITzshd%2FtQfpRZJguYZc
> %3D
> > >>
> &amp;reserved=0%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40nxp.com%7Ca0
> > >> d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c
> > >> 301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=AVw3XdjmiRO
> > >> XP7Xz7MTNMVgzI8hYG9aWsR02opMZqjM%3D&amp;reserved=0>
> > >> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> > >>
> > >> Follow Linaro:
> > >> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> > >> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.facebook.c
> > >>
> om&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40nxp.com%7C523c8a2809a34f577008
> 08d
> > >>
> 6561f0575%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6367910885
> 72
> > >>
> 030840&amp;sdata=bbsFbY4CoFGFyduTSXlR9oK42hpFGAXTmZMAswNchkU%3
> D&amp
> > >> ;reserved=0%2Fpages%2FLinaro&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tan
> > >> g%40nxp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3b
> > >> c2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;s
> > >>
> data=NM8wm4ri%2F2kdBW0FdCSXrL5ogg6owPfoRGacqm%2BKsEw%3D&a
> > >> mp;reserved=0> Facebook |
> > >> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> > >> t
> witter.com%2F%23!%2Flinaroorg&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40n
> > >> xp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6
> > >> fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=
> > >> Wplqwpisgmqrf3yLhTzdo5O6TvN2Jfu5IjBTvS4xOWk%3D&amp;reserved=0>
> > >> Twitter |
> > >> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> > >> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.linaro.org
> > >>
> &amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40nxp.com%7C523c8a2809a34f57700808d
> 65
> > >>
> 61f0575%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636791088572
> 03
> > >>
> 0840&amp;sdata=XV0I9%2B3FctUSF%2BDAqRVEWGk8ITzshd%2FtQfpRZJguYZc
> %3D
> > >>
> &amp;reserved=0%2Flinaro-blog%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40
> > >> nxp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c
> > >> 6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&amp;sdata=I
> > >> b6KFIP3LNPGuDDb1dpnOllrqAAsc%2BZNCUuJZUPso6k%3D&amp;reserve
> > >> d=0> Blog
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww
> > .linaro.org%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40nxp.com%7C523c8a280
> 9a34f
> >
> 57700808d6561f0575%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6
> 36791
> >
> 088572030840&amp;sdata=JdPh7CGtYKckvXZbaXyYh1YIzLIWuINxGuc8%2Fp5qb
> 7w%3
> > D&amp;reserved=0> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> >
> > Follow Linaro:
> >
> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww
> > .facebook.com%2Fpages%2FLinaro&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40nx
> p.com%
> >
> 7C523c8a2809a34f57700808d6561f0575%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c3016
> 35%
> >
> 7C0%7C0%7C636791088572030840&amp;sdata=120jlpoyO%2FErgYCdiJkQ5PIu1
> lqIO
> > 976W%2BBlifjq9zw%3D&amp;reserved=0> Facebook |
> > <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwi
> >
> tter.com%2F%23!%2Flinaroorg&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40nxp.com
> %7C5
> >
> 23c8a2809a34f57700808d6561f0575%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635
> %7C0
> > %7C0%7C636791088572030840&amp;sdata=hqRnoNwph7It3VtREb9PMnktZn
> 6IWqPVht
> > RqXL8qyKA%3D&amp;reserved=0> Twitter |
> >
> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww
> > .linaro.org%2Flinaro-blog%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40nxp.com
> %7C
> >
> 523c8a2809a34f57700808d6561f0575%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635
> %7C
> >
> 0%7C0%7C636791088572030840&amp;sdata=GYax5%2FZzQtx6omIyuMMw0klh
> rFUNsnP
> > LFZ%2Fsg4OY%2BYI%3D&amp;reserved=0> Blog
> >