From: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
Implement the kretprobes on riscv arch by using rethook machenism
which abstracts general kretprobe info into a struct rethook_node
to be embedded in the struct kretprobe_instance.
Signed-off-by: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
---
Notes:
v8: Add the omitted rethook.h
v7: Add the changelog.
v6: Remove the kretprobes trampoline.
v5: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
v4: Add patch version number.
v3: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
v2: Add comit log to explain reasons behind changes.
Use my personal email instead of work email
to avoid the attachments of company informaton.
Make the kprobes_trampoline.S code to be shared.
v1: Add riscv rethook implementation.
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h | 2 --
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 13 ---------
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h | 8 ++++++
...obes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} | 6 ++---
7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
rename arch/riscv/kernel/probes/{kprobes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} (94%)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index 59d18881f..bfb66cdc5 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ config RISCV
select HAVE_KPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL
select HAVE_KRETPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
+ select HAVE_RETHOOK if !XIP_KERNEL
select HAVE_MOVE_PMD
select HAVE_MOVE_PUD
select HAVE_PCI
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
index 217ef89f2..e7882ccb0 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
@@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int trapnr);
bool kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
bool kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
-void __kretprobe_trampoline(void);
-void __kprobes *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
#endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_KPROBES_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
index 7f0840dcc..c40139e9c 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes_trampoline.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_RETHOOK) += rethook.o rethook_trampoline.o
obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE) += ftrace.o
obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
CFLAGS_REMOVE_simulate-insn.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
index e6e950b7c..f21592d20 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
@@ -345,19 +345,6 @@ int __init arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void)
return ret;
}
-void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- return (void *)kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, NULL);
-}
-
-void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->ra;
- ri->fp = NULL;
- regs->ra = (unsigned long) &__kretprobe_trampoline;
-}
-
int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
{
return 0;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cbd0da059
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Generic return hook for riscv.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kprobes.h>
+#include <linux/rethook.h>
+#include "rethook.h"
+
+/* This is called from arch_rethook_trampoline() */
+unsigned long __used arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ return rethook_trampoline_handler(regs, regs->s0);
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_trampoline_callback);
+
+
+void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs *regs, bool mcount)
+{
+ rhn->ret_addr = regs->ra;
+ rhn->frame = regs->s0;
+
+ /* replace return addr with trampoline */
+ regs->ra = (unsigned long)arch_rethook_trampoline;
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_prepare);
+
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cc573d701
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#ifndef __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
+#define __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
+
+unsigned long arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs *regs);
+void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs *regs, bool mcount);
+
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
similarity index 94%
rename from arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
rename to arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
index 7bdb09ded..21bac92a1 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
@@ -75,13 +75,13 @@
REG_L x31, PT_T6(sp)
.endm
-ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
+ENTRY(arch_rethook_trampoline)
addi sp, sp, -(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK)
save_all_base_regs
move a0, sp /* pt_regs */
- call trampoline_probe_handler
+ call arch_rethook_trampoline_callback
/* use the result as the return-address */
move ra, a0
@@ -90,4 +90,4 @@ ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
addi sp, sp, PT_SIZE_ON_STACK
ret
-ENDPROC(__kretprobe_trampoline)
+ENDPROC(arch_rethook_trampoline)
--
2.27.0
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 16:13:57 +0800
Binglei Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
>
> Implement the kretprobes on riscv arch by using rethook machenism
> which abstracts general kretprobe info into a struct rethook_node
> to be embedded in the struct kretprobe_instance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
This looks good to me.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
Thank you,
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v8: Add the omitted rethook.h
> v7: Add the changelog.
> v6: Remove the kretprobes trampoline.
> v5: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
> v4: Add patch version number.
> v3: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
> v2: Add comit log to explain reasons behind changes.
> Use my personal email instead of work email
> to avoid the attachments of company informaton.
> Make the kprobes_trampoline.S code to be shared.
> v1: Add riscv rethook implementation.
>
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h | 2 --
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 13 ---------
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h | 8 ++++++
> ...obes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} | 6 ++---
> 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> rename arch/riscv/kernel/probes/{kprobes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} (94%)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 59d18881f..bfb66cdc5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ config RISCV
> select HAVE_KPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL
> select HAVE_KRETPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> + select HAVE_RETHOOK if !XIP_KERNEL
> select HAVE_MOVE_PMD
> select HAVE_MOVE_PUD
> select HAVE_PCI
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> index 217ef89f2..e7882ccb0 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> @@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
> int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int trapnr);
> bool kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> bool kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> -void __kretprobe_trampoline(void);
> -void __kprobes *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_KPROBES_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> index 7f0840dcc..c40139e9c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes_trampoline.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RETHOOK) += rethook.o rethook_trampoline.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE) += ftrace.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_simulate-insn.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index e6e950b7c..f21592d20 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -345,19 +345,6 @@ int __init arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> -{
> - return (void *)kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, NULL);
> -}
> -
> -void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
> - struct pt_regs *regs)
> -{
> - ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->ra;
> - ri->fp = NULL;
> - regs->ra = (unsigned long) &__kretprobe_trampoline;
> -}
> -
> int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> return 0;
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..cbd0da059
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Generic return hook for riscv.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> +#include <linux/rethook.h>
> +#include "rethook.h"
> +
> +/* This is called from arch_rethook_trampoline() */
> +unsigned long __used arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + return rethook_trampoline_handler(regs, regs->s0);
> +}
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_trampoline_callback);
> +
> +
> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs *regs, bool mcount)
> +{
> + rhn->ret_addr = regs->ra;
> + rhn->frame = regs->s0;
> +
> + /* replace return addr with trampoline */
> + regs->ra = (unsigned long)arch_rethook_trampoline;
> +}
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_prepare);
> +
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..cc573d701
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +#ifndef __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
> +#define __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
> +
> +unsigned long arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs *regs, bool mcount);
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> similarity index 94%
> rename from arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
> rename to arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> index 7bdb09ded..21bac92a1 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> @@ -75,13 +75,13 @@
> REG_L x31, PT_T6(sp)
> .endm
>
> -ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> +ENTRY(arch_rethook_trampoline)
> addi sp, sp, -(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK)
> save_all_base_regs
>
> move a0, sp /* pt_regs */
>
> - call trampoline_probe_handler
> + call arch_rethook_trampoline_callback
>
> /* use the result as the return-address */
> move ra, a0
> @@ -90,4 +90,4 @@ ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> addi sp, sp, PT_SIZE_ON_STACK
>
> ret
> -ENDPROC(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> +ENDPROC(arch_rethook_trampoline)
> --
> 2.27.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
Hey Binglei,
I am not qualified to give you an actual R-b on this patch, but I see
you did get one from Masami who very much is!
That said, the patch looks a lot better (and much simpler!) now. Thanks
for sticking with it despite the initial issues with your email setup
and the submission process.
Thanks,
Conor.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 04:13:57PM +0800, Binglei Wang wrote:
> From: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
>
> Implement the kretprobes on riscv arch by using rethook machenism
> which abstracts general kretprobe info into a struct rethook_node
> to be embedded in the struct kretprobe_instance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v8: Add the omitted rethook.h
> v7: Add the changelog.
> v6: Remove the kretprobes trampoline.
> v5: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
> v4: Add patch version number.
> v3: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
> v2: Add comit log to explain reasons behind changes.
> Use my personal email instead of work email
> to avoid the attachments of company informaton.
> Make the kprobes_trampoline.S code to be shared.
> v1: Add riscv rethook implementation.
>
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h | 2 --
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 13 ---------
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h | 8 ++++++
> ...obes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} | 6 ++---
> 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> rename arch/riscv/kernel/probes/{kprobes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} (94%)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 59d18881f..bfb66cdc5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ config RISCV
> select HAVE_KPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL
> select HAVE_KRETPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> + select HAVE_RETHOOK if !XIP_KERNEL
> select HAVE_MOVE_PMD
> select HAVE_MOVE_PUD
> select HAVE_PCI
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> index 217ef89f2..e7882ccb0 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> @@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
> int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int trapnr);
> bool kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> bool kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> -void __kretprobe_trampoline(void);
> -void __kprobes *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_KPROBES_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> index 7f0840dcc..c40139e9c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes_trampoline.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RETHOOK) += rethook.o rethook_trampoline.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE) += ftrace.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_simulate-insn.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index e6e950b7c..f21592d20 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -345,19 +345,6 @@ int __init arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> -{
> - return (void *)kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, NULL);
> -}
> -
> -void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
> - struct pt_regs *regs)
> -{
> - ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->ra;
> - ri->fp = NULL;
> - regs->ra = (unsigned long) &__kretprobe_trampoline;
> -}
> -
> int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> return 0;
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..cbd0da059
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Generic return hook for riscv.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> +#include <linux/rethook.h>
> +#include "rethook.h"
> +
> +/* This is called from arch_rethook_trampoline() */
> +unsigned long __used arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + return rethook_trampoline_handler(regs, regs->s0);
> +}
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_trampoline_callback);
> +
> +
> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs *regs, bool mcount)
> +{
> + rhn->ret_addr = regs->ra;
> + rhn->frame = regs->s0;
> +
> + /* replace return addr with trampoline */
> + regs->ra = (unsigned long)arch_rethook_trampoline;
> +}
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_prepare);
> +
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..cc573d701
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +#ifndef __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
> +#define __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
> +
> +unsigned long arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs *regs, bool mcount);
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> similarity index 94%
> rename from arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
> rename to arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> index 7bdb09ded..21bac92a1 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> @@ -75,13 +75,13 @@
> REG_L x31, PT_T6(sp)
> .endm
>
> -ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> +ENTRY(arch_rethook_trampoline)
> addi sp, sp, -(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK)
> save_all_base_regs
>
> move a0, sp /* pt_regs */
>
> - call trampoline_probe_handler
> + call arch_rethook_trampoline_callback
>
> /* use the result as the return-address */
> move ra, a0
> @@ -90,4 +90,4 @@ ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> addi sp, sp, PT_SIZE_ON_STACK
>
> ret
> -ENDPROC(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> +ENDPROC(arch_rethook_trampoline)
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Hi Conor,
could you please help me to push forward merging process of this patch
into the 6.1 ? Thank you!
Binglei Wang
Best wishes.
On 2022-10-03 00:39, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Hey Binglei,
> I am not qualified to give you an actual R-b on this patch, but I see
> you did get one from Masami who very much is!
>
> That said, the patch looks a lot better (and much simpler!) now. Thanks
> for sticking with it despite the initial issues with your email setup
> and the submission process.
>
> Thanks,
> Conor.
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 04:13:57PM +0800, Binglei Wang wrote:
>> From: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
>>
>> Implement the kretprobes on riscv arch by using rethook machenism
>> which abstracts general kretprobe info into a struct rethook_node
>> to be embedded in the struct kretprobe_instance.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>> v8: Add the omitted rethook.h
>> v7: Add the changelog.
>> v6: Remove the kretprobes trampoline.
>> v5: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
>> v4: Add patch version number.
>> v3: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
>> v2: Add comit log to explain reasons behind changes.
>> Use my personal email instead of work email
>> to avoid the attachments of company informaton.
>> Make the kprobes_trampoline.S code to be shared.
>> v1: Add riscv rethook implementation.
>>
>> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h | 2 --
>> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile | 2 +-
>> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 13 ---------
>> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h | 8 ++++++
>> ...obes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} | 6 ++---
>> 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
>> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
>> rename arch/riscv/kernel/probes/{kprobes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} (94%)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> index 59d18881f..bfb66cdc5 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ config RISCV
>> select HAVE_KPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
>> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL
>> select HAVE_KRETPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
>> + select HAVE_RETHOOK if !XIP_KERNEL
>> select HAVE_MOVE_PMD
>> select HAVE_MOVE_PUD
>> select HAVE_PCI
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
>> index 217ef89f2..e7882ccb0 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
>> @@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
>> int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int trapnr);
>> bool kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> bool kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> -void __kretprobe_trampoline(void);
>> -void __kprobes *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
>>
>> #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
>> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_KPROBES_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
>> index 7f0840dcc..c40139e9c 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes_trampoline.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_RETHOOK) += rethook.o rethook_trampoline.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE) += ftrace.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
>> CFLAGS_REMOVE_simulate-insn.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
>> index e6e950b7c..f21592d20 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
>> @@ -345,19 +345,6 @@ int __init arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> -{
>> - return (void *)kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, NULL);
>> -}
>> -
>> -void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
>> - struct pt_regs *regs)
>> -{
>> - ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->ra;
>> - ri->fp = NULL;
>> - regs->ra = (unsigned long) &__kretprobe_trampoline;
>> -}
>> -
>> int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>> {
>> return 0;
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000..cbd0da059
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * Generic return hook for riscv.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
>> +#include <linux/rethook.h>
>> +#include "rethook.h"
>> +
>> +/* This is called from arch_rethook_trampoline() */
>> +unsigned long __used arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> + return rethook_trampoline_handler(regs, regs->s0);
>> +}
>> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_trampoline_callback);
>> +
>> +
>> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs *regs, bool mcount)
>> +{
>> + rhn->ret_addr = regs->ra;
>> + rhn->frame = regs->s0;
>> +
>> + /* replace return addr with trampoline */
>> + regs->ra = (unsigned long)arch_rethook_trampoline;
>> +}
>> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_prepare);
>> +
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000..cc573d701
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +#ifndef __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
>> +#define __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
>> +
>> +unsigned long arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs *regs, bool mcount);
>> +
>> +#endif
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
>> similarity index 94%
>> rename from arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
>> rename to arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
>> index 7bdb09ded..21bac92a1 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
>> @@ -75,13 +75,13 @@
>> REG_L x31, PT_T6(sp)
>> .endm
>>
>> -ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
>> +ENTRY(arch_rethook_trampoline)
>> addi sp, sp, -(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK)
>> save_all_base_regs
>>
>> move a0, sp /* pt_regs */
>>
>> - call trampoline_probe_handler
>> + call arch_rethook_trampoline_callback
>>
>> /* use the result as the return-address */
>> move ra, a0
>> @@ -90,4 +90,4 @@ ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
>> addi sp, sp, PT_SIZE_ON_STACK
>>
>> ret
>> -ENDPROC(__kretprobe_trampoline)
>> +ENDPROC(arch_rethook_trampoline)
>> --
>> 2.27.0
>>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:31:28PM +0800, binglei wang wrote:
> Hi Conor,
> could you please help me to push forward merging process of this patch
> into the 6.1 ? Thank you!
Hey Binglei,
Unfortunately it is too late for v6.1 (the merge window closed on
Sunday, Palmer sent his second PR on Friday) but I don't see why this
should not be picked for v6.2. I tried last week & again just now to
check the status of this patch on patchwork but I cannot find it there.
Similarly, the patch does not appear on lore:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAJ3C4KzyAR7dKYFBKHzFEXr-dzr-JMGRFVx+dybMhRPy0uHUgA@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <[email protected]>
2022-10-02 9:10 ` [PATCH v8] rethook: add riscv rethook implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2022-10-02 16:39 ` Conor Dooley
2022-10-17 14:31 ` binglei wang
I'm not really sure what's happened there.. I can only see your v1 and
your v4 on lore/patchwork. Maybe take a look if you changed anything
between versions & try resending as v9?
HTH,
Conor.
>
> Binglei Wang
> Best wishes.
>
>
> On 2022-10-03 00:39, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > Hey Binglei,
> > I am not qualified to give you an actual R-b on this patch, but I see
> > you did get one from Masami who very much is!
> >
> > That said, the patch looks a lot better (and much simpler!) now. Thanks
> > for sticking with it despite the initial issues with your email setup
> > and the submission process.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Conor.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 04:13:57PM +0800, Binglei Wang wrote:
> >> From: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> Implement the kretprobes on riscv arch by using rethook machenism
> >> which abstracts general kretprobe info into a struct rethook_node
> >> to be embedded in the struct kretprobe_instance.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Notes:
> >> v8: Add the omitted rethook.h
> >> v7: Add the changelog.
> >> v6: Remove the kretprobes trampoline.
> >> v5: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
> >> v4: Add patch version number.
> >> v3: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
> >> v2: Add comit log to explain reasons behind changes.
> >> Use my personal email instead of work email
> >> to avoid the attachments of company informaton.
> >> Make the kprobes_trampoline.S code to be shared.
> >> v1: Add riscv rethook implementation.
> >>
> >> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h | 2 --
> >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile | 2 +-
> >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 13 ---------
> >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h | 8 ++++++
> >> ...obes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} | 6 ++---
> >> 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> >> rename arch/riscv/kernel/probes/{kprobes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} (94%)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >> index 59d18881f..bfb66cdc5 100644
> >> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ config RISCV
> >> select HAVE_KPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> >> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL
> >> select HAVE_KRETPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> >> + select HAVE_RETHOOK if !XIP_KERNEL
> >> select HAVE_MOVE_PMD
> >> select HAVE_MOVE_PUD
> >> select HAVE_PCI
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> >> index 217ef89f2..e7882ccb0 100644
> >> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> >> @@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
> >> int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int trapnr);
> >> bool kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> >> bool kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> >> -void __kretprobe_trampoline(void);
> >> -void __kprobes *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> >>
> >> #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
> >> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_KPROBES_H */
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> >> index 7f0840dcc..c40139e9c 100644
> >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
> >> -obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes_trampoline.o
> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_RETHOOK) += rethook.o rethook_trampoline.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE) += ftrace.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
> >> CFLAGS_REMOVE_simulate-insn.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> >> index e6e950b7c..f21592d20 100644
> >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> >> @@ -345,19 +345,6 @@ int __init arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void)
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >> -{
> >> - return (void *)kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, NULL);
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
> >> - struct pt_regs *regs)
> >> -{
> >> - ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->ra;
> >> - ri->fp = NULL;
> >> - regs->ra = (unsigned long) &__kretprobe_trampoline;
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> >> {
> >> return 0;
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000..cbd0da059
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >> +/*
> >> + * Generic return hook for riscv.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> >> +#include <linux/rethook.h>
> >> +#include "rethook.h"
> >> +
> >> +/* This is called from arch_rethook_trampoline() */
> >> +unsigned long __used arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >> +{
> >> + return rethook_trampoline_handler(regs, regs->s0);
> >> +}
> >> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_trampoline_callback);
> >> +
> >> +
> >> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs *regs, bool mcount)
> >> +{
> >> + rhn->ret_addr = regs->ra;
> >> + rhn->frame = regs->s0;
> >> +
> >> + /* replace return addr with trampoline */
> >> + regs->ra = (unsigned long)arch_rethook_trampoline;
> >> +}
> >> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_prepare);
> >> +
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000..cc573d701
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >> +#ifndef __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
> >> +#define __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
> >> +
> >> +unsigned long arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs *regs);
> >> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs *regs, bool mcount);
> >> +
> >> +#endif
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> >> similarity index 94%
> >> rename from arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
> >> rename to arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> >> index 7bdb09ded..21bac92a1 100644
> >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> >> @@ -75,13 +75,13 @@
> >> REG_L x31, PT_T6(sp)
> >> .endm
> >>
> >> -ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> >> +ENTRY(arch_rethook_trampoline)
> >> addi sp, sp, -(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK)
> >> save_all_base_regs
> >>
> >> move a0, sp /* pt_regs */
> >>
> >> - call trampoline_probe_handler
> >> + call arch_rethook_trampoline_callback
> >>
> >> /* use the result as the return-address */
> >> move ra, a0
> >> @@ -90,4 +90,4 @@ ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> >> addi sp, sp, PT_SIZE_ON_STACK
> >>
> >> ret
> >> -ENDPROC(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> >> +ENDPROC(arch_rethook_trampoline)
> >> --
> >> 2.27.0
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:08:55PM +0800, binglei wang wrote:
> Hi Conor:
> Thank you for your help to check the merging process for this patch.
>
> > Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
> > -- links below jump to the message on this page --
> > [not found] <[email protected]>
> I have no idea what this means, I guess maybe the way i sended the
> patch was not right.
>
> I found the patch on the lore in this url, is this helpful ?
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
Hmm, looks like your patch made it to lkml itself but got rejected by
linux-riscv which is hosted by infradead. It's missing here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAJ3C4Kwj0yYS5JCPw=g0X9qiQhw04iKy_cTjc0x8iWdy0ay7bg@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
>
> > I'm not really sure what's happened there.. I can only see your v1 and
> > your v4 on lore/patchwork.
> I find all my commits from v1 to v8 in this addr
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/?q=l3b2w1
>
> Should I resend the patch as a last resort ?
Eh, I guess you could try (and CC [email protected]). I'm not sure
if that'll help at all though.. At worst, if that doesn't work I could
possibly send the patches for you. Or if you think you may end up doing
more upstream work you could always apply for an @linux.dev account?
See https://korg.docs.kernel.org/linuxdev.html for more information on
that.
>
> Binglei Wang
> Best wishes.
>
> Conor Dooley <[email protected]> 于2022年10月17日周一 22:58写道：
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:31:28PM +0800, binglei wang wrote:
> > > Hi Conor,
> > > could you please help me to push forward merging process of this patch
> > > into the 6.1 ? Thank you!
> >
> > Hey Binglei,
> > Unfortunately it is too late for v6.1 (the merge window closed on
> > Sunday, Palmer sent his second PR on Friday) but I don't see why this
> > should not be picked for v6.2. I tried last week & again just now to
> > check the status of this patch on patchwork but I cannot find it there.
> > Similarly, the patch does not appear on lore:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAJ3C4KzyAR7dKYFBKHzFEXr-dzr-JMGRFVx+dybMhRPy0uHUgA@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
> > Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
> > -- links below jump to the message on this page --
> > [not found] <[email protected]>
> > 2022-10-02 9:10 ` [PATCH v8] rethook: add riscv rethook implementation Masami Hiramatsu
> > 2022-10-02 16:39 ` Conor Dooley
> > 2022-10-17 14:31 ` binglei wang
> >
> > I'm not really sure what's happened there.. I can only see your v1 and
> > your v4 on lore/patchwork. Maybe take a look if you changed anything
> > between versions & try resending as v9?
> >
> > HTH,
> > Conor.
> >
> > >
> > > Binglei Wang
> > > Best wishes.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2022-10-03 00:39, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > Hey Binglei,
> > > > I am not qualified to give you an actual R-b on this patch, but I see
> > > > you did get one from Masami who very much is!
> > > >
> > > > That said, the patch looks a lot better (and much simpler!) now. Thanks
> > > > for sticking with it despite the initial issues with your email setup
> > > > and the submission process.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Conor.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 04:13:57PM +0800, Binglei Wang wrote:
> > > >> From: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
> > > >>
> > > >> Implement the kretprobes on riscv arch by using rethook machenism
> > > >> which abstracts general kretprobe info into a struct rethook_node
> > > >> to be embedded in the struct kretprobe_instance.
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
> > > >> ---
> > > >>
> > > >> Notes:
> > > >> v8: Add the omitted rethook.h
> > > >> v7: Add the changelog.
> > > >> v6: Remove the kretprobes trampoline.
> > > >> v5: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
> > > >> v4: Add patch version number.
> > > >> v3: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
> > > >> v2: Add comit log to explain reasons behind changes.
> > > >> Use my personal email instead of work email
> > > >> to avoid the attachments of company informaton.
> > > >> Make the kprobes_trampoline.S code to be shared.
> > > >> v1: Add riscv rethook implementation.
> > > >>
> > > >> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > >> arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h | 2 --
> > > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile | 2 +-
> > > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 13 ---------
> > > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h | 8 ++++++
> > > >> ...obes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} | 6 ++---
> > > >> 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > > >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> > > >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> > > >> rename arch/riscv/kernel/probes/{kprobes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} (94%)
> > > >>
> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > >> index 59d18881f..bfb66cdc5 100644
> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > >> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ config RISCV
> > > >> select HAVE_KPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> > > >> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL
> > > >> select HAVE_KRETPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> > > >> + select HAVE_RETHOOK if !XIP_KERNEL
> > > >> select HAVE_MOVE_PMD
> > > >> select HAVE_MOVE_PUD
> > > >> select HAVE_PCI
> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> > > >> index 217ef89f2..e7882ccb0 100644
> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> > > >> @@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
> > > >> int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int trapnr);
> > > >> bool kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> > > >> bool kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> > > >> -void __kretprobe_trampoline(void);
> > > >> -void __kprobes *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> > > >>
> > > >> #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
> > > >> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_KPROBES_H */
> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> > > >> index 7f0840dcc..c40139e9c 100644
> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> > > >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > > >> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
> > > >> -obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes_trampoline.o
> > > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_RETHOOK) += rethook.o rethook_trampoline.o
> > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE) += ftrace.o
> > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
> > > >> CFLAGS_REMOVE_simulate-insn.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > > >> index e6e950b7c..f21592d20 100644
> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > > >> @@ -345,19 +345,6 @@ int __init arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void)
> > > >> return ret;
> > > >> }
> > > >>
> > > >> -void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > >> -{
> > > >> - return (void *)kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, NULL);
> > > >> -}
> > > >> -
> > > >> -void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
> > > >> - struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > >> -{
> > > >> - ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->ra;
> > > >> - ri->fp = NULL;
> > > >> - regs->ra = (unsigned long) &__kretprobe_trampoline;
> > > >> -}
> > > >> -
> > > >> int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> > > >> {
> > > >> return 0;
> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> > > >> new file mode 100644
> > > >> index 000000000..cbd0da059
> > > >> --- /dev/null
> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> > > >> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> > > >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > >> +/*
> > > >> + * Generic return hook for riscv.
> > > >> + */
> > > >> +
> > > >> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> > > >> +#include <linux/rethook.h>
> > > >> +#include "rethook.h"
> > > >> +
> > > >> +/* This is called from arch_rethook_trampoline() */
> > > >> +unsigned long __used arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > >> +{
> > > >> + return rethook_trampoline_handler(regs, regs->s0);
> > > >> +}
> > > >> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_trampoline_callback);
> > > >> +
> > > >> +
> > > >> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs *regs, bool mcount)
> > > >> +{
> > > >> + rhn->ret_addr = regs->ra;
> > > >> + rhn->frame = regs->s0;
> > > >> +
> > > >> + /* replace return addr with trampoline */
> > > >> + regs->ra = (unsigned long)arch_rethook_trampoline;
> > > >> +}
> > > >> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_prepare);
> > > >> +
> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> > > >> new file mode 100644
> > > >> index 000000000..cc573d701
> > > >> --- /dev/null
> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> > > >> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> > > >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > >> +#ifndef __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
> > > >> +#define __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
> > > >> +
> > > >> +unsigned long arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs *regs);
> > > >> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs *regs, bool mcount);
> > > >> +
> > > >> +#endif
> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> > > >> similarity index 94%
> > > >> rename from arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
> > > >> rename to arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> > > >> index 7bdb09ded..21bac92a1 100644
> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> > > >> @@ -75,13 +75,13 @@
> > > >> REG_L x31, PT_T6(sp)
> > > >> .endm
> > > >>
> > > >> -ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> > > >> +ENTRY(arch_rethook_trampoline)
> > > >> addi sp, sp, -(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK)
> > > >> save_all_base_regs
> > > >>
> > > >> move a0, sp /* pt_regs */
> > > >>
> > > >> - call trampoline_probe_handler
> > > >> + call arch_rethook_trampoline_callback
> > > >>
> > > >> /* use the result as the return-address */
> > > >> move ra, a0
> > > >> @@ -90,4 +90,4 @@ ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> > > >> addi sp, sp, PT_SIZE_ON_STACK
> > > >>
> > > >> ret
> > > >> -ENDPROC(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> > > >> +ENDPROC(arch_rethook_trampoline)
> > > >> --
> > > >> 2.27.0
> > > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-riscv mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> > >
Hi Conor:
Thank you for your help to check the merging process for this patch.
> Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
> -- links below jump to the message on this page --
> [not found] <[email protected]>
I have no idea what this means, I guess maybe the way i sended the
patch was not right.
I found the patch on the lore in this url, is this helpful ?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> I'm not really sure what's happened there.. I can only see your v1 and
> your v4 on lore/patchwork.
I find all my commits from v1 to v8 in this addr
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/?q=l3b2w1
Should I resend the patch as a last resort ?
Binglei Wang
Best wishes.
Conor Dooley <[email protected]> 于2022年10月17日周一 22:58写道：
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:31:28PM +0800, binglei wang wrote:
> > Hi Conor,
> > could you please help me to push forward merging process of this patch
> > into the 6.1 ? Thank you!
>
> Hey Binglei,
> Unfortunately it is too late for v6.1 (the merge window closed on
> Sunday, Palmer sent his second PR on Friday) but I don't see why this
> should not be picked for v6.2. I tried last week & again just now to
> check the status of this patch on patchwork but I cannot find it there.
> Similarly, the patch does not appear on lore:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAJ3C4KzyAR7dKYFBKHzFEXr-dzr-JMGRFVx+dybMhRPy0uHUgA@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
> Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
> -- links below jump to the message on this page --
> [not found] <[email protected]>
> 2022-10-02 9:10 ` [PATCH v8] rethook: add riscv rethook implementation Masami Hiramatsu
> 2022-10-02 16:39 ` Conor Dooley
> 2022-10-17 14:31 ` binglei wang
>
> I'm not really sure what's happened there.. I can only see your v1 and
> your v4 on lore/patchwork. Maybe take a look if you changed anything
> between versions & try resending as v9?
>
> HTH,
> Conor.
>
> >
> > Binglei Wang
> > Best wishes.
> >
> >
> > On 2022-10-03 00:39, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > Hey Binglei,
> > > I am not qualified to give you an actual R-b on this patch, but I see
> > > you did get one from Masami who very much is!
> > >
> > > That said, the patch looks a lot better (and much simpler!) now. Thanks
> > > for sticking with it despite the initial issues with your email setup
> > > and the submission process.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Conor.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 04:13:57PM +0800, Binglei Wang wrote:
> > >> From: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
> > >>
> > >> Implement the kretprobes on riscv arch by using rethook machenism
> > >> which abstracts general kretprobe info into a struct rethook_node
> > >> to be embedded in the struct kretprobe_instance.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> Notes:
> > >> v8: Add the omitted rethook.h
> > >> v7: Add the changelog.
> > >> v6: Remove the kretprobes trampoline.
> > >> v5: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
> > >> v4: Add patch version number.
> > >> v3: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
> > >> v2: Add comit log to explain reasons behind changes.
> > >> Use my personal email instead of work email
> > >> to avoid the attachments of company informaton.
> > >> Make the kprobes_trampoline.S code to be shared.
> > >> v1: Add riscv rethook implementation.
> > >>
> > >> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> > >> arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h | 2 --
> > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile | 2 +-
> > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 13 ---------
> > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h | 8 ++++++
> > >> ...obes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} | 6 ++---
> > >> 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> > >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> > >> rename arch/riscv/kernel/probes/{kprobes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} (94%)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > >> index 59d18881f..bfb66cdc5 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > >> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ config RISCV
> > >> select HAVE_KPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> > >> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL
> > >> select HAVE_KRETPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> > >> + select HAVE_RETHOOK if !XIP_KERNEL
> > >> select HAVE_MOVE_PMD
> > >> select HAVE_MOVE_PUD
> > >> select HAVE_PCI
> > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> > >> index 217ef89f2..e7882ccb0 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> > >> @@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
> > >> int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int trapnr);
> > >> bool kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> > >> bool kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> > >> -void __kretprobe_trampoline(void);
> > >> -void __kprobes *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> > >>
> > >> #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
> > >> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_KPROBES_H */
> > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> > >> index 7f0840dcc..c40139e9c 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> > >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > >> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > >> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
> > >> -obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes_trampoline.o
> > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_RETHOOK) += rethook.o rethook_trampoline.o
> > >> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE) += ftrace.o
> > >> obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
> > >> CFLAGS_REMOVE_simulate-insn.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > >> index e6e950b7c..f21592d20 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> > >> @@ -345,19 +345,6 @@ int __init arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void)
> > >> return ret;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> -void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > >> -{
> > >> - return (void *)kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, NULL);
> > >> -}
> > >> -
> > >> -void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
> > >> - struct pt_regs *regs)
> > >> -{
> > >> - ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->ra;
> > >> - ri->fp = NULL;
> > >> - regs->ra = (unsigned long) &__kretprobe_trampoline;
> > >> -}
> > >> -
> > >> int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> > >> {
> > >> return 0;
> > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> > >> new file mode 100644
> > >> index 000000000..cbd0da059
> > >> --- /dev/null
> > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> > >> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> > >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > >> +/*
> > >> + * Generic return hook for riscv.
> > >> + */
> > >> +
> > >> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> > >> +#include <linux/rethook.h>
> > >> +#include "rethook.h"
> > >> +
> > >> +/* This is called from arch_rethook_trampoline() */
> > >> +unsigned long __used arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > >> +{
> > >> + return rethook_trampoline_handler(regs, regs->s0);
> > >> +}
> > >> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_trampoline_callback);
> > >> +
> > >> +
> > >> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs *regs, bool mcount)
> > >> +{
> > >> + rhn->ret_addr = regs->ra;
> > >> + rhn->frame = regs->s0;
> > >> +
> > >> + /* replace return addr with trampoline */
> > >> + regs->ra = (unsigned long)arch_rethook_trampoline;
> > >> +}
> > >> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_prepare);
> > >> +
> > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> > >> new file mode 100644
> > >> index 000000000..cc573d701
> > >> --- /dev/null
> > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> > >> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> > >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > >> +#ifndef __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
> > >> +#define __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
> > >> +
> > >> +unsigned long arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs *regs);
> > >> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs *regs, bool mcount);
> > >> +
> > >> +#endif
> > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> > >> similarity index 94%
> > >> rename from arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
> > >> rename to arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> > >> index 7bdb09ded..21bac92a1 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
> > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> > >> @@ -75,13 +75,13 @@
> > >> REG_L x31, PT_T6(sp)
> > >> .endm
> > >>
> > >> -ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> > >> +ENTRY(arch_rethook_trampoline)
> > >> addi sp, sp, -(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK)
> > >> save_all_base_regs
> > >>
> > >> move a0, sp /* pt_regs */
> > >>
> > >> - call trampoline_probe_handler
> > >> + call arch_rethook_trampoline_callback
> > >>
> > >> /* use the result as the return-address */
> > >> move ra, a0
> > >> @@ -90,4 +90,4 @@ ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> > >> addi sp, sp, PT_SIZE_ON_STACK
> > >>
> > >> ret
> > >> -ENDPROC(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> > >> +ENDPROC(arch_rethook_trampoline)
> > >> --
> > >> 2.27.0
> > >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> >
Hi Conor,
I would appreciate if you can send the patch for me this time !
As keen as mustard i am to see the patch applied and merged if there
is no something unsuitable.
Binglei Wang
Best wishes.
2022-10-18 22:22 GMT+08:00, Conor Dooley <[email protected]>:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:08:55PM +0800, binglei wang wrote:
>> Hi Conor:
>> Thank you for your help to check the merging process for this patch.
>>
>> > Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
>> > -- links below jump to the message on this page --
>> > [not found] <[email protected]>
>> I have no idea what this means, I guess maybe the way i sended the
>> patch was not right.
>>
>> I found the patch on the lore in this url, is this helpful ?
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>
> Hmm, looks like your patch made it to lkml itself but got rejected by
> linux-riscv which is hosted by infradead. It's missing here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAJ3C4Kwj0yYS5JCPw=g0X9qiQhw04iKy_cTjc0x8iWdy0ay7bg@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
>
>>
>> > I'm not really sure what's happened there.. I can only see your v1 and
>> > your v4 on lore/patchwork.
>> I find all my commits from v1 to v8 in this addr
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/?q=l3b2w1
>>
>> Should I resend the patch as a last resort ?
>
> Eh, I guess you could try (and CC [email protected]). I'm not sure
> if that'll help at all though.. At worst, if that doesn't work I could
> possibly send the patches for you. Or if you think you may end up doing
> more upstream work you could always apply for an @linux.dev account?
> See https://korg.docs.kernel.org/linuxdev.html for more information on
> that.
>
>>
>> Binglei Wang
>> Best wishes.
>>
>> Conor Dooley <[email protected]> 于2022年10月17日周一 22:58写道：
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:31:28PM +0800, binglei wang wrote:
>> > > Hi Conor,
>> > > could you please help me to push forward merging process of this
>> > > patch
>> > > into the 6.1 ? Thank you!
>> >
>> > Hey Binglei,
>> > Unfortunately it is too late for v6.1 (the merge window closed on
>> > Sunday, Palmer sent his second PR on Friday) but I don't see why this
>> > should not be picked for v6.2. I tried last week & again just now to
>> > check the status of this patch on patchwork but I cannot find it there.
>> > Similarly, the patch does not appear on lore:
>> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAJ3C4KzyAR7dKYFBKHzFEXr-dzr-JMGRFVx+dybMhRPy0uHUgA@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
>> > Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
>> > -- links below jump to the message on this page --
>> > [not found] <[email protected]>
>> > 2022-10-02 9:10 ` [PATCH v8] rethook: add riscv rethook implementation
>> > Masami Hiramatsu
>> > 2022-10-02 16:39 ` Conor Dooley
>> > 2022-10-17 14:31 ` binglei wang
>> >
>> > I'm not really sure what's happened there.. I can only see your v1 and
>> > your v4 on lore/patchwork. Maybe take a look if you changed anything
>> > between versions & try resending as v9?
>> >
>> > HTH,
>> > Conor.
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Binglei Wang
>> > > Best wishes.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 2022-10-03 00:39, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> > > > Hey Binglei,
>> > > > I am not qualified to give you an actual R-b on this patch, but I
>> > > > see
>> > > > you did get one from Masami who very much is!
>> > > >
>> > > > That said, the patch looks a lot better (and much simpler!) now.
>> > > > Thanks
>> > > > for sticking with it despite the initial issues with your email
>> > > > setup
>> > > > and the submission process.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Conor.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 04:13:57PM +0800, Binglei Wang wrote:
>> > > >> From: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Implement the kretprobes on riscv arch by using rethook machenism
>> > > >> which abstracts general kretprobe info into a struct rethook_node
>> > > >> to be embedded in the struct kretprobe_instance.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Signed-off-by: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
>> > > >> ---
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Notes:
>> > > >> v8: Add the omitted rethook.h
>> > > >> v7: Add the changelog.
>> > > >> v6: Remove the kretprobes trampoline.
>> > > >> v5: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
>> > > >> v4: Add patch version number.
>> > > >> v3: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
>> > > >> v2: Add comit log to explain reasons behind changes.
>> > > >> Use my personal email instead of work email
>> > > >> to avoid the attachments of company informaton.
>> > > >> Make the kprobes_trampoline.S code to be shared.
>> > > >> v1: Add riscv rethook implementation.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
>> > > >> arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h | 2 --
>> > > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile | 2 +-
>> > > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 13 ---------
>> > > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c | 27
>> > > >> +++++++++++++++++++
>> > > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h | 8 ++++++
>> > > >> ...obes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} | 6 ++---
>> > > >> 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>> > > >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
>> > > >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
>> > > >> rename arch/riscv/kernel/probes/{kprobes_trampoline.S =>
>> > > >> rethook_trampoline.S} (94%)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> > > >> index 59d18881f..bfb66cdc5 100644
>> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> > > >> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ config RISCV
>> > > >> select HAVE_KPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
>> > > >> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL
>> > > >> select HAVE_KRETPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
>> > > >> + select HAVE_RETHOOK if !XIP_KERNEL
>> > > >> select HAVE_MOVE_PMD
>> > > >> select HAVE_MOVE_PUD
>> > > >> select HAVE_PCI
>> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
>> > > >> b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
>> > > >> index 217ef89f2..e7882ccb0 100644
>> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
>> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
>> > > >> @@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
>> > > >> int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int
>> > > >> trapnr);
>> > > >> bool kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> > > >> bool kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> > > >> -void __kretprobe_trampoline(void);
>> > > >> -void __kprobes *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> > > >>
>> > > >> #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
>> > > >> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_KPROBES_H */
>> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
>> > > >> b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
>> > > >> index 7f0840dcc..c40139e9c 100644
>> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
>> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
>> > > >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>> > > >> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o decode-insn.o
>> > > >> simulate-insn.o
>> > > >> -obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes_trampoline.o
>> > > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_RETHOOK) += rethook.o
>> > > >> rethook_trampoline.o
>> > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE) += ftrace.o
>> > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o decode-insn.o
>> > > >> simulate-insn.o
>> > > >> CFLAGS_REMOVE_simulate-insn.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
>> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
>> > > >> b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
>> > > >> index e6e950b7c..f21592d20 100644
>> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
>> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
>> > > >> @@ -345,19 +345,6 @@ int __init
>> > > >> arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void)
>> > > >> return ret;
>> > > >> }
>> > > >>
>> > > >> -void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs
>> > > >> *regs)
>> > > >> -{
>> > > >> - return (void *)kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, NULL);
>> > > >> -}
>> > > >> -
>> > > >> -void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance
>> > > >> *ri,
>> > > >> - struct pt_regs *regs)
>> > > >> -{
>> > > >> - ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->ra;
>> > > >> - ri->fp = NULL;
>> > > >> - regs->ra = (unsigned long) &__kretprobe_trampoline;
>> > > >> -}
>> > > >> -
>> > > >> int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>> > > >> {
>> > > >> return 0;
>> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
>> > > >> b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
>> > > >> new file mode 100644
>> > > >> index 000000000..cbd0da059
>> > > >> --- /dev/null
>> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
>> > > >> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
>> > > >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> > > >> +/*
>> > > >> + * Generic return hook for riscv.
>> > > >> + */
>> > > >> +
>> > > >> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
>> > > >> +#include <linux/rethook.h>
>> > > >> +#include "rethook.h"
>> > > >> +
>> > > >> +/* This is called from arch_rethook_trampoline() */
>> > > >> +unsigned long __used arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct
>> > > >> pt_regs *regs)
>> > > >> +{
>> > > >> + return rethook_trampoline_handler(regs, regs->s0);
>> > > >> +}
>> > > >> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_trampoline_callback);
>> > > >> +
>> > > >> +
>> > > >> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs
>> > > >> *regs, bool mcount)
>> > > >> +{
>> > > >> + rhn->ret_addr = regs->ra;
>> > > >> + rhn->frame = regs->s0;
>> > > >> +
>> > > >> + /* replace return addr with trampoline */
>> > > >> + regs->ra = (unsigned long)arch_rethook_trampoline;
>> > > >> +}
>> > > >> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_prepare);
>> > > >> +
>> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
>> > > >> b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
>> > > >> new file mode 100644
>> > > >> index 000000000..cc573d701
>> > > >> --- /dev/null
>> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
>> > > >> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
>> > > >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> > > >> +#ifndef __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
>> > > >> +#define __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
>> > > >> +
>> > > >> +unsigned long arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs
>> > > >> *regs);
>> > > >> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs
>> > > >> *regs, bool mcount);
>> > > >> +
>> > > >> +#endif
>> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
>> > > >> b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
>> > > >> similarity index 94%
>> > > >> rename from arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
>> > > >> rename to arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
>> > > >> index 7bdb09ded..21bac92a1 100644
>> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
>> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
>> > > >> @@ -75,13 +75,13 @@
>> > > >> REG_L x31, PT_T6(sp)
>> > > >> .endm
>> > > >>
>> > > >> -ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
>> > > >> +ENTRY(arch_rethook_trampoline)
>> > > >> addi sp, sp, -(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK)
>> > > >> save_all_base_regs
>> > > >>
>> > > >> move a0, sp /* pt_regs */
>> > > >>
>> > > >> - call trampoline_probe_handler
>> > > >> + call arch_rethook_trampoline_callback
>> > > >>
>> > > >> /* use the result as the return-address */
>> > > >> move ra, a0
>> > > >> @@ -90,4 +90,4 @@ ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
>> > > >> addi sp, sp, PT_SIZE_ON_STACK
>> > > >>
>> > > >> ret
>> > > >> -ENDPROC(__kretprobe_trampoline)
>> > > >> +ENDPROC(arch_rethook_trampoline)
>> > > >> --
>> > > >> 2.27.0
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > linux-riscv mailing list
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>> > >
>
On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 01:14:15AM +0800, binglei wang wrote:
> Hi Conor,
> I would appreciate if you can send the patch for me this time !
> As keen as mustard i am to see the patch applied and merged if there
> is no something unsuitable.
I was in the process of doing a resend on your behalf but I noticed some
issues with the patch. Firstly, there's a whitespace error:
Applying: rethook: add riscv rethook implementation
/stuff/linux/.git/rebase-apply/patch:121: new blank line at EOF.
+
warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
And there are a bunch of errors from checkpatch too:
./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict -g HEAD
CHECK: Please use a blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations
#107: FILE: arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c:15:
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_trampoline_callback);
CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines
#109: FILE: arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c:17:
+
+
CHECK: Please use a blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations
#118: FILE: arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c:26:
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_prepare);
WARNING: Improper SPDX comment style for 'arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h', please use '/*' instead
#126: FILE: arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h:1:
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
WARNING: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1
#126: FILE: arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h:1:
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 3 checks, 96 lines checked
I'm still happy to resend it on your behalf once these issues are fixed.
Thanks,
Conor.
>
>
>
> 2022-10-18 22:22 GMT+08:00, Conor Dooley <[email protected]>:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:08:55PM +0800, binglei wang wrote:
> >> Hi Conor:
> >> Thank you for your help to check the merging process for this patch.
> >>
> >> > Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
> >> > -- links below jump to the message on this page --
> >> > [not found] <[email protected]>
> >> I have no idea what this means, I guess maybe the way i sended the
> >> patch was not right.
> >>
> >> I found the patch on the lore in this url, is this helpful ?
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> >
> > Hmm, looks like your patch made it to lkml itself but got rejected by
> > linux-riscv which is hosted by infradead. It's missing here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAJ3C4Kwj0yYS5JCPw=g0X9qiQhw04iKy_cTjc0x8iWdy0ay7bg@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
> >
> >>
> >> > I'm not really sure what's happened there.. I can only see your v1 and
> >> > your v4 on lore/patchwork.
> >> I find all my commits from v1 to v8 in this addr
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/?q=l3b2w1
> >>
> >> Should I resend the patch as a last resort ?
> >
> > Eh, I guess you could try (and CC [email protected]). I'm not sure
> > if that'll help at all though.. At worst, if that doesn't work I could
> > possibly send the patches for you. Or if you think you may end up doing
> > more upstream work you could always apply for an @linux.dev account?
> > See https://korg.docs.kernel.org/linuxdev.html for more information on
> > that.
> >
> >>
> >> Binglei Wang
> >> Best wishes.
> >>
> >> Conor Dooley <[email protected]> 于2022年10月17日周一 22:58写道：
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:31:28PM +0800, binglei wang wrote:
> >> > > Hi Conor,
> >> > > could you please help me to push forward merging process of this
> >> > > patch
> >> > > into the 6.1 ? Thank you!
> >> >
> >> > Hey Binglei,
> >> > Unfortunately it is too late for v6.1 (the merge window closed on
> >> > Sunday, Palmer sent his second PR on Friday) but I don't see why this
> >> > should not be picked for v6.2. I tried last week & again just now to
> >> > check the status of this patch on patchwork but I cannot find it there.
> >> > Similarly, the patch does not appear on lore:
> >> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAJ3C4KzyAR7dKYFBKHzFEXr-dzr-JMGRFVx+dybMhRPy0uHUgA@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
> >> > Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
> >> > -- links below jump to the message on this page --
> >> > [not found] <[email protected]>
> >> > 2022-10-02 9:10 ` [PATCH v8] rethook: add riscv rethook implementation
> >> > Masami Hiramatsu
> >> > 2022-10-02 16:39 ` Conor Dooley
> >> > 2022-10-17 14:31 ` binglei wang
> >> >
> >> > I'm not really sure what's happened there.. I can only see your v1 and
> >> > your v4 on lore/patchwork. Maybe take a look if you changed anything
> >> > between versions & try resending as v9?
> >> >
> >> > HTH,
> >> > Conor.
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Binglei Wang
> >> > > Best wishes.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On 2022-10-03 00:39, Conor Dooley wrote:
> >> > > > Hey Binglei,
> >> > > > I am not qualified to give you an actual R-b on this patch, but I
> >> > > > see
> >> > > > you did get one from Masami who very much is!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > That said, the patch looks a lot better (and much simpler!) now.
> >> > > > Thanks
> >> > > > for sticking with it despite the initial issues with your email
> >> > > > setup
> >> > > > and the submission process.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > Conor.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 04:13:57PM +0800, Binglei Wang wrote:
> >> > > >> From: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Implement the kretprobes on riscv arch by using rethook machenism
> >> > > >> which abstracts general kretprobe info into a struct rethook_node
> >> > > >> to be embedded in the struct kretprobe_instance.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Binglei Wang <[email protected]>
> >> > > >> ---
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Notes:
> >> > > >> v8: Add the omitted rethook.h
> >> > > >> v7: Add the changelog.
> >> > > >> v6: Remove the kretprobes trampoline.
> >> > > >> v5: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
> >> > > >> v4: Add patch version number.
> >> > > >> v3: Trt to fix robot compiling error and warnings.
> >> > > >> v2: Add comit log to explain reasons behind changes.
> >> > > >> Use my personal email instead of work email
> >> > > >> to avoid the attachments of company informaton.
> >> > > >> Make the kprobes_trampoline.S code to be shared.
> >> > > >> v1: Add riscv rethook implementation.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> >> > > >> arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h | 2 --
> >> > > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile | 2 +-
> >> > > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 13 ---------
> >> > > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c | 27
> >> > > >> +++++++++++++++++++
> >> > > >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h | 8 ++++++
> >> > > >> ...obes_trampoline.S => rethook_trampoline.S} | 6 ++---
> >> > > >> 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >> > > >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> >> > > >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> >> > > >> rename arch/riscv/kernel/probes/{kprobes_trampoline.S =>
> >> > > >> rethook_trampoline.S} (94%)
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >> > > >> index 59d18881f..bfb66cdc5 100644
> >> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >> > > >> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ config RISCV
> >> > > >> select HAVE_KPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> >> > > >> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL
> >> > > >> select HAVE_KRETPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> >> > > >> + select HAVE_RETHOOK if !XIP_KERNEL
> >> > > >> select HAVE_MOVE_PMD
> >> > > >> select HAVE_MOVE_PUD
> >> > > >> select HAVE_PCI
> >> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> >> > > >> b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> >> > > >> index 217ef89f2..e7882ccb0 100644
> >> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> >> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> >> > > >> @@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
> >> > > >> int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int
> >> > > >> trapnr);
> >> > > >> bool kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> >> > > >> bool kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> >> > > >> -void __kretprobe_trampoline(void);
> >> > > >> -void __kprobes *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
> >> > > >> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_KPROBES_H */
> >> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> >> > > >> b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> >> > > >> index 7f0840dcc..c40139e9c 100644
> >> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> >> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> >> > > >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >> > > >> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o decode-insn.o
> >> > > >> simulate-insn.o
> >> > > >> -obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes_trampoline.o
> >> > > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_RETHOOK) += rethook.o
> >> > > >> rethook_trampoline.o
> >> > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE) += ftrace.o
> >> > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o decode-insn.o
> >> > > >> simulate-insn.o
> >> > > >> CFLAGS_REMOVE_simulate-insn.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> >> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> >> > > >> b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> >> > > >> index e6e950b7c..f21592d20 100644
> >> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> >> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> >> > > >> @@ -345,19 +345,6 @@ int __init
> >> > > >> arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void)
> >> > > >> return ret;
> >> > > >> }
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> -void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs
> >> > > >> *regs)
> >> > > >> -{
> >> > > >> - return (void *)kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, NULL);
> >> > > >> -}
> >> > > >> -
> >> > > >> -void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance
> >> > > >> *ri,
> >> > > >> - struct pt_regs *regs)
> >> > > >> -{
> >> > > >> - ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->ra;
> >> > > >> - ri->fp = NULL;
> >> > > >> - regs->ra = (unsigned long) &__kretprobe_trampoline;
> >> > > >> -}
> >> > > >> -
> >> > > >> int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> >> > > >> {
> >> > > >> return 0;
> >> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> >> > > >> b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> >> > > >> new file mode 100644
> >> > > >> index 000000000..cbd0da059
> >> > > >> --- /dev/null
> >> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.c
> >> > > >> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> >> > > >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >> > > >> +/*
> >> > > >> + * Generic return hook for riscv.
> >> > > >> + */
> >> > > >> +
> >> > > >> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> >> > > >> +#include <linux/rethook.h>
> >> > > >> +#include "rethook.h"
> >> > > >> +
> >> > > >> +/* This is called from arch_rethook_trampoline() */
> >> > > >> +unsigned long __used arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct
> >> > > >> pt_regs *regs)
> >> > > >> +{
> >> > > >> + return rethook_trampoline_handler(regs, regs->s0);
> >> > > >> +}
> >> > > >> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_trampoline_callback);
> >> > > >> +
> >> > > >> +
> >> > > >> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs
> >> > > >> *regs, bool mcount)
> >> > > >> +{
> >> > > >> + rhn->ret_addr = regs->ra;
> >> > > >> + rhn->frame = regs->s0;
> >> > > >> +
> >> > > >> + /* replace return addr with trampoline */
> >> > > >> + regs->ra = (unsigned long)arch_rethook_trampoline;
> >> > > >> +}
> >> > > >> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_rethook_prepare);
> >> > > >> +
> >> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> >> > > >> b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> >> > > >> new file mode 100644
> >> > > >> index 000000000..cc573d701
> >> > > >> --- /dev/null
> >> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook.h
> >> > > >> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> >> > > >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >> > > >> +#ifndef __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
> >> > > >> +#define __RISCV_RETHOOK_H
> >> > > >> +
> >> > > >> +unsigned long arch_rethook_trampoline_callback(struct pt_regs
> >> > > >> *regs);
> >> > > >> +void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rhn, struct pt_regs
> >> > > >> *regs, bool mcount);
> >> > > >> +
> >> > > >> +#endif
> >> > > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
> >> > > >> b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> >> > > >> similarity index 94%
> >> > > >> rename from arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
> >> > > >> rename to arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> >> > > >> index 7bdb09ded..21bac92a1 100644
> >> > > >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S
> >> > > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/rethook_trampoline.S
> >> > > >> @@ -75,13 +75,13 @@
> >> > > >> REG_L x31, PT_T6(sp)
> >> > > >> .endm
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> -ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> >> > > >> +ENTRY(arch_rethook_trampoline)
> >> > > >> addi sp, sp, -(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK)
> >> > > >> save_all_base_regs
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> move a0, sp /* pt_regs */
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> - call trampoline_probe_handler
> >> > > >> + call arch_rethook_trampoline_callback
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> /* use the result as the return-address */
> >> > > >> move ra, a0
> >> > > >> @@ -90,4 +90,4 @@ ENTRY(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> >> > > >> addi sp, sp, PT_SIZE_ON_STACK
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> ret
> >> > > >> -ENDPROC(__kretprobe_trampoline)
> >> > > >> +ENDPROC(arch_rethook_trampoline)
> >> > > >> --
> >> > > >> 2.27.0
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > linux-riscv mailing list
> >> > > [email protected]
> >> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> >> > >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv