This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.1 release.
There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:03:19 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.1-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 6.0.1-rc1
Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]>
Bluetooth: use hdev->workqueue when queuing hdev->{cmd,ncmd}_timer works
Jules Irenge <[email protected]>
bpf: Fix resetting logic for unreferenced kptrs
Daniel Golle <[email protected]>
net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: fix state in __mtk_foe_entry_clear
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
bpf: Gate dynptr API behind CAP_BPF
Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
RISC-V: Print SSTC in canonical order
Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
gpiolib: acpi: Add a quirk for Asus UM325UAZ
Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
gpiolib: acpi: Add support to ignore programming an interrupt
Johan Hovold <[email protected]>
USB: serial: ftdi_sio: fix 300 bps rate for SIO
Tadeusz Struk <[email protected]>
usb: mon: make mmapped memory read only
Aleksa Savic <[email protected]>
hwmon: (aquacomputer_d5next) Fix Quadro fan speed offsets
Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
docs: update mediator information in CoC docs
Kees Cook <[email protected]>
hardening: Remove Clang's enable flag for -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
Sami Tolvanen <[email protected]>
Makefile.extrawarn: Move -Wcast-function-type-strict to W=1
Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
sparc: Unbreak the build
Al Viro <[email protected]>
fix coredump breakage
Dongliang Mu <[email protected]>
fs: fix UAF/GPF bug in nilfs_mdt_destroy
Jalal Mostafa <[email protected]>
xsk: Inherit need_wakeup flag for shared sockets
-------------
Diffstat:
.../process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst | 2 +-
Makefile | 8 ++---
arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 2 +-
arch/sparc/include/asm/smp_32.h | 15 ++++-----
arch/sparc/kernel/leon_smp.c | 12 ++++---
arch/sparc/kernel/sun4d_smp.c | 12 ++++---
arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_smp.c | 10 +++---
arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c | 29 ++++++++---------
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/hwmon/aquacomputer_d5next.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe.c | 2 +-
drivers/usb/mon/mon_bin.c | 5 +++
drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c | 3 +-
fs/coredump.c | 3 +-
fs/inode.c | 7 ++--
include/net/xsk_buff_pool.h | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 28 ++++++++--------
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 +-
net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 15 +++++++--
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 6 ++--
net/xdp/xsk.c | 4 +--
net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c | 5 +--
scripts/Makefile.extrawarn | 1 +
security/Kconfig.hardening | 14 +++++---
24 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
From: Sami Tolvanen <[email protected]>
commit 2120635108b35ecad9c59c8b44f6cbdf4f98214e upstream.
We enable -Wcast-function-type globally in the kernel to warn about
mismatching types in function pointer casts. Compilers currently
warn only about ABI incompability with this flag, but Clang 16 will
enable a stricter version of the check by default that checks for an
exact type match. This will be very noisy in the kernel, so disable
-Wcast-function-type-strict without W=1 until the new warnings have
been addressed.
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134831
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1724
Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
scripts/Makefile.extrawarn | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-sign-compare
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, pointer-to-enum-cast)
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-tautological-constant-out-of-range-compare
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, unaligned-access)
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, cast-function-type-strict)
endif
endif
Hey Greg,
Ran tests and boot tested on my system, no regressions found
Tested-by: Fenil Jain <[email protected]>
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 12:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.1 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:03:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
NOTE:
Following kernel crash reported on arm64 db410c.
This reported [1] on Linux next-20220614 and not a new issue.
However, We will investigate this device's specific issues.
[ 10.387800] Internal error: Oops: 8600000f [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 10.492941] Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#2] PREEMPT SMP
[ 10.880744] Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#3] PREEMPT SMP
[ 11.575707] Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#4] PREEMPT SMP
Crash log:
[ 10.348663] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address 0000000000000000
[ 10.369488] Mem abort info:
[ 10.369630] ESR = 0x0000000096000006
[ 10.371870] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ 10.373514] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address 0000000000000000
[ 10.381921] Mem abort info:
[ 10.382116] SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ 10.387666] Unable to handle kernel execute from non-executable
memory at virtual address ffff00000213afc8
[ 10.387683] Mem abort info:
[ 10.387690] ESR = 0x000000008600000f
[ 10.387699] EC = 0x21: IABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ 10.387709] SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ 10.387718] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[ 10.387726] FSC = 0x0f: level 3 permission fault
[ 10.387735] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000081f4a000
[ 10.387747] [ffff00000213afc8] pgd=18000000bfef7003,
p4d=18000000bfef7003, pud=18000000bfef6003, pmd=18000000bfef3003,
pte=006800008213af07
[ 10.387800] Internal error: Oops: 8600000f [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 10.387807] Modules linked in: venus_enc(+) videobuf2_dma_contig
qcom_wcnss_pil adv7511 cec snd_soc_lpass_apq8016 snd_soc_lpass_cpu
snd_soc_msm8916_digital snd_soc_lpass_platform qrtr qcom_q6v5_mss
snd_soc_apq8016_sbc qcom_pil_info snd_soc_qcom_common qcom_spmi_vadc
qcom_q6v5 snd_soc_msm8916_analog qcom_spmi_temp_alarm qcom_pon
qcom_sysmon rtc_pm8xxx msm qcom_vadc_common qcom_camss qcom_common
venus_core qcom_glink_smem qmi_helpers videobuf2_dma_sg v4l2_fwnode
gpu_sched i2c_qcom_cci v4l2_mem2mem qcom_rng v4l2_async qnoc_msm8916
drm_dp_aux_bus qcom_stats mdt_loader drm_display_helper
videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common crct10dif_ce
icc_smd_rpm display_connector drm_kms_helper rmtfs_mem socinfo fuse
drm
[ 10.387979] CPU: 1 PID: 278 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 6.0.1-rc1 #1
[ 10.387988] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. APQ 8016 SBC (DT)
[ 10.387993] pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 10.388003] pc : 0xffff00000213afc8
[ 10.388013] lr : sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb4/0x130
ref:
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/YqnfRyJkhPCVBmDz@FVFF77S0Q05N/T/
[2] https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.0.y/build/v6.0-18-g6556cadf037c/testrun/12319851/suite/log-parser-boot/tests/
## Build
* kernel: 6.0.1-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.0.y
* git commit: 6556cadf037c53a554c4eadd80a3bd652f38b208
* git describe: v6.0-18-g6556cadf037c
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.0.y/build/v6.0-18-g6556cadf037c
## No Test Regressions (compared to v6.0)
## No Metric Regressions (compared to v6.0)
## No Test Fixes (compared to v6.0)
## No Metric Fixes (compared to v6.0)
## Test result summary
total: 114438, pass: 102109, fail: 1135, skip: 11045, xfail: 149
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 333 total, 329 passed, 4 failed
* arm64: 65 total, 65 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 55 total, 55 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 56 total, 55 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 69 total, 63 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 58 total, 58 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 09:04:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.1 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:03:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <[email protected]>
On 10/10/22 00:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.1 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:03:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian
Hi Greg
6.0.1-rc1
compiles, boots and runs here on x86_64
(Intel i5-11400, Fedora 37 Beta)
Thanks
Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <[email protected]>
On 10/10/22 01:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.1 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:03:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
thanks,
-- Shuah
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 12:31 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.1 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:03:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Compiled and booted on my test system Lenovo P50s: Intel Core i7
No emergency and critical messages in the dmesg
./perf bench sched all
# Running sched/messaging benchmark...
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 10 groups == 400 processes run
Total time: 0.676 [sec]
# Running sched/pipe benchmark...
# Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
Total time: 8.978 [sec]
8.978893 usecs/op
111372 ops/sec
Tested-by: Zan Aziz <[email protected]>
Thanks
-Zan
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 09:04:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.1 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:03:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
6.0.1-rc1 compiled and booted on my x86_64 test system. No errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins <[email protected]>
Thanks,
-srw
On 10/10/22 00:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.1 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:03:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 149 pass: 149 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 490 pass: 490 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Guenter
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 09:04:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.1 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:03:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
6.0.1-rc1 tested.
Run tested on:
- Intel Alder Lake x86_64 (nuc12 i7-1260P)
In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- Allwinner H6
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos5422
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <[email protected]>
--
Rudi
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 09:04:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.1 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On 10/10/2022 08:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.1 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:03:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
No new regressions for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.0:
11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
130 tests: 128 pass, 2 fail
Linux version: 6.0.1-rc1-g6556cadf037c
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
tegra210-p3450-0000: devices
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <[email protected]>
A fix is available for the tegra210 failure and the other is a new
kernel warning that is being discussed but nothing critical.
Jon
--
nvpublic
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 09:04:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.1 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:03:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220925):
mips: 52 configs -> no failure
arm: 100 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
--
Regards
Sudip
On 10/10/22 12:04 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.1 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:03:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <[email protected]>