2022-11-07 23:06:09

by Maíra Canal

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/v3d: add missing mutex_destroy

v3d_perfmon_open_file() instantiates a mutex for a particular file
instance, but it never destroys it by calling mutex_destroy() in
v3d_perfmon_close_file().

Similarly, v3d_perfmon_create_ioctl() instantiates a mutex for a
particular perfmon, but it never destroys it by calling mutex_destroy()
in v3d_perfmon_destroy_ioctl().

So, add the missing mutex_destroy on both cases.

Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_perfmon.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_perfmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_perfmon.c
index 48aaaa972c49..292c73544255 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_perfmon.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_perfmon.c
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ void v3d_perfmon_close_file(struct v3d_file_priv *v3d_priv)
idr_for_each(&v3d_priv->perfmon.idr, v3d_perfmon_idr_del, NULL);
idr_destroy(&v3d_priv->perfmon.idr);
mutex_unlock(&v3d_priv->perfmon.lock);
+ mutex_destroy(&v3d_priv->perfmon.lock);
}

int v3d_perfmon_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
@@ -177,6 +178,7 @@ int v3d_perfmon_destroy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
if (!perfmon)
return -EINVAL;

+ mutex_destroy(&perfmon->lock);
v3d_perfmon_put(perfmon);

return 0;
--
2.38.1



2022-11-08 16:43:44

by Daniel Vetter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/v3d: add missing mutex_destroy

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 07:46:56PM -0300, Ma?ra Canal wrote:
> v3d_perfmon_open_file() instantiates a mutex for a particular file
> instance, but it never destroys it by calling mutex_destroy() in
> v3d_perfmon_close_file().
>
> Similarly, v3d_perfmon_create_ioctl() instantiates a mutex for a
> particular perfmon, but it never destroys it by calling mutex_destroy()
> in v3d_perfmon_destroy_ioctl().
>
> So, add the missing mutex_destroy on both cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ma?ra Canal <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_perfmon.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_perfmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_perfmon.c
> index 48aaaa972c49..292c73544255 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_perfmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_perfmon.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ void v3d_perfmon_close_file(struct v3d_file_priv *v3d_priv)
> idr_for_each(&v3d_priv->perfmon.idr, v3d_perfmon_idr_del, NULL);
> idr_destroy(&v3d_priv->perfmon.idr);
> mutex_unlock(&v3d_priv->perfmon.lock);
> + mutex_destroy(&v3d_priv->perfmon.lock);
> }
>
> int v3d_perfmon_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> @@ -177,6 +178,7 @@ int v3d_perfmon_destroy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> if (!perfmon)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + mutex_destroy(&perfmon->lock);

This one looks wrong, I think this should be put into v3d_perfmon_put.
There is also an error case in v3d_perfmon_create_ioctl() that I think you
missed, right above the kfree(perfmon).

With these two fixes this is Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>


> v3d_perfmon_put(perfmon);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.38.1
>

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch