We currently have 3 different ways that __iommu_probe_device() may be
called, but no real guarantee that multiple callers can't tread on each
other, especially once asynchronous driver probe gets involved. It would
likely have taken a fair bit of luck to hit this previously, but commit
57365a04c921 ("iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU device registration") ups
the odds since now it's not just omap-iommu that may trigger multiple
bus_iommu_probe() calls in parallel if probing asynchronously.
Add a lock to ensure we can't try to double-probe a device, and also
close some possible race windows to make sure we're truly robust against
trying to double-initialise a group via two different member devices.
Reported-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
---
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 65a3b3d886dc..959d895fc1df 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -283,13 +283,23 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list
const struct iommu_ops *ops = dev->bus->iommu_ops;
struct iommu_device *iommu_dev;
struct iommu_group *group;
+ static DEFINE_MUTEX(iommu_probe_device_lock);
int ret;
if (!ops)
return -ENODEV;
-
- if (!dev_iommu_get(dev))
- return -ENOMEM;
+ /*
+ * Serialise to avoid races between IOMMU drivers registering in
+ * parallel and/or the "replay" calls from ACPI/OF code via client
+ * driver probe. Once the latter have been cleaned up we should
+ * probably be able to use device_lock() here to minimise the scope,
+ * but for now enforcing a simple global ordering is fine.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&iommu_probe_device_lock);
+ if (!dev_iommu_get(dev)) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_unlock;
+ }
if (!try_module_get(ops->owner)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -309,11 +319,14 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list
ret = PTR_ERR(group);
goto out_release;
}
- iommu_group_put(group);
+ mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
if (group_list && !group->default_domain && list_empty(&group->entry))
list_add_tail(&group->entry, group_list);
+ mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
+ iommu_group_put(group);
+ mutex_unlock(&iommu_probe_device_lock);
iommu_device_link(iommu_dev, dev);
return 0;
@@ -328,6 +341,9 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list
err_free:
dev_iommu_free(dev);
+err_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&iommu_probe_device_lock);
+
return ret;
}
@@ -1799,11 +1815,11 @@ int bus_iommu_probe(struct bus_type *bus)
return ret;
list_for_each_entry_safe(group, next, &group_list, entry) {
+ mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
+
/* Remove item from the list */
list_del_init(&group->entry);
- mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
-
/* Try to allocate default domain */
probe_alloc_default_domain(bus, group);
--
2.36.1.dirty
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 07:51:43PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> We currently have 3 different ways that __iommu_probe_device() may be
> called, but no real guarantee that multiple callers can't tread on each
> other, especially once asynchronous driver probe gets involved. It would
> likely have taken a fair bit of luck to hit this previously, but commit
> 57365a04c921 ("iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU device registration") ups
> the odds since now it's not just omap-iommu that may trigger multiple
> bus_iommu_probe() calls in parallel if probing asynchronously.
>
> Add a lock to ensure we can't try to double-probe a device, and also
> close some possible race windows to make sure we're truly robust against
> trying to double-initialise a group via two different member devices.
>
> Reported-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
If I've tested appropriately (there's always room for operator error),
this seems to resolve the problems I reported:
Tested-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
I haven't reviewed closely enough to know how precisely this is a
regression (your description sounds like you think the bug existed some
time before that), but based on testing, this sounds like:
Fixes: 57365a04c921 ("iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU device
registration")
But even if not, the report could probably use:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
And most of all, thanks!
Brian
On 2022-11-05 01:36, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 07:51:43PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> We currently have 3 different ways that __iommu_probe_device() may be
>> called, but no real guarantee that multiple callers can't tread on each
>> other, especially once asynchronous driver probe gets involved. It would
>> likely have taken a fair bit of luck to hit this previously, but commit
>> 57365a04c921 ("iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU device registration") ups
>> the odds since now it's not just omap-iommu that may trigger multiple
>> bus_iommu_probe() calls in parallel if probing asynchronously.
>>
>> Add a lock to ensure we can't try to double-probe a device, and also
>> close some possible race windows to make sure we're truly robust against
>> trying to double-initialise a group via two different member devices.
>>
>> Reported-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> If I've tested appropriately (there's always room for operator error),
> this seems to resolve the problems I reported:
>
> Tested-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
>
> I haven't reviewed closely enough to know how precisely this is a
> regression (your description sounds like you think the bug existed some
> time before that), but based on testing, this sounds like:
>
> Fixes: 57365a04c921 ("iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU device
> registration")
That commit did not introduce the race, just made it more visible. The
underlying condition probably goes back at least 3 years to where we
started allocating and freeing per-device data around what was then the
ops->add_device() call.
In practice, you'd have to be absurdly lucky for an iommu_probe_device()
call via {of,acpi}_dma_configure() to line up with bus_iommu_probe()
touching the same device, but by inspection I think it's theoretically
possible. Thus previously there was probably only a realistic chance of
seeing it on certain OMAP systems, where the explicit bus_iommu_probe()
calls could overlap if both instances probed in parallel - my commit
just brings all the other drivers in line with that same behaviour via
iommu_device_register(). Other systems - like Rockchip in particular -
may have greater numbers of IOMMU instances and thus even more chance
for parallel probes to line up just right.
Since nobody's ever reported real-world issues on OMAP (although it's
quite likely nobody's ever tried driver_async_probe with omap-iommu
anyway) there doesn't seem to be a compelling reason for backporting, so
I didn't fancy spending hours digging through subsystem-wide history
trying to figure out an appropriate fixes tag; as long as this can make
6.1 that should be enough :)
Thanks,
Robin.
> But even if not, the report could probably use:
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>
> And most of all, thanks!
>
> Brian
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 07:51:43PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> We currently have 3 different ways that __iommu_probe_device() may be
> called, but no real guarantee that multiple callers can't tread on each
> other, especially once asynchronous driver probe gets involved. It would
> likely have taken a fair bit of luck to hit this previously, but commit
> 57365a04c921 ("iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU device registration") ups
> the odds since now it's not just omap-iommu that may trigger multiple
> bus_iommu_probe() calls in parallel if probing asynchronously.
>
> Add a lock to ensure we can't try to double-probe a device, and also
> close some possible race windows to make sure we're truly robust against
> trying to double-initialise a group via two different member devices.
>
> Reported-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks Robin.