From: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
.probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
that explicitly in the probe function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
---
drivers/video/backlight/adp8870_bl.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/adp8870_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/adp8870_bl.c
index 5becace3fd0f..d6b0007db649 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/adp8870_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/adp8870_bl.c
@@ -836,9 +836,9 @@ static const struct attribute_group adp8870_bl_attr_group = {
.attrs = adp8870_bl_attributes,
};
-static int adp8870_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
- const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+static int adp8870_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
{
+ const struct i2c_device_id *id = i2c_client_get_device_id(client);
struct backlight_properties props;
struct backlight_device *bl;
struct adp8870_bl *data;
@@ -973,7 +973,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver adp8870_driver = {
.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
.pm = &adp8870_i2c_pm_ops,
},
- .probe = adp8870_probe,
+ .probe_new = adp8870_probe,
.remove = adp8870_remove,
.id_table = adp8870_id,
};
--
2.38.1
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:45:20PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> From: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <[email protected]>
>
> .probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
> that explicitly in the probe function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <[email protected]>
Daniel.