This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.4.228-rc1
Yasushi SHOJI <[email protected]>
can: mcba_usb: Fix termination command argument
Heiko Schocher <[email protected]>
can: sja1000: fix size of OCR_MODE_MASK define
Ricardo Ribalda <[email protected]>
pinctrl: meditatek: Startup with the IRQs disabled
Mark Brown <[email protected]>
ASoC: ops: Check bounds for second channel in snd_soc_put_volsw_sx()
Jialiang Wang <[email protected]>
nfp: fix use-after-free in area_cache_get()
Ming Lei <[email protected]>
block: unhash blkdev part inode when the part is deleted
Baolin Wang <[email protected]>
mm/hugetlb: fix races when looking up a CONT-PTE/PMD size hugetlb page
Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
x86/smpboot: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier
Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]>
net: bpf: Allow TC programs to call BPF_FUNC_skb_change_head
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c | 2 --
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 1 +
block/partition-generic.c | 7 +++++
drivers/net/can/usb/mcba_usb.c | 10 +++++---
.../ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cppcore.c | 3 ++-
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c | 9 ++++---
include/linux/can/platform/sja1000.h | 2 +-
include/linux/hugetlb.h | 6 ++---
mm/gup.c | 13 +++++++++-
mm/hugetlb.c | 30 +++++++++++-----------
net/core/filter.c | 2 ++
sound/soc/soc-ops.c | 6 +++++
13 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
On 12/15/22 11:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
thanks,
-- Shuah
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 23:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
## Build
* kernel: 5.4.228-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.4.y
* git commit: e538d4b64ed30c6b7248a14b4e8641db4db16736
* git describe: v5.4.227-10-ge538d4b64ed3
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.227-10-ge538d4b64ed3
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.226-68-g8c05f5e0777d)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.226-68-g8c05f5e0777d)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.226-68-g8c05f5e0777d)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.226-68-g8c05f5e0777d)
## Test result summary
total: 114869, pass: 99876, fail: 1964, skip: 12795, xfail: 234
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 146 total, 145 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 44 total, 40 passed, 4 failed
* i386: 26 total, 20 passed, 6 failed
* mips: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 11 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 35 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* ltp[
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221127):
mips: 65 configs -> no failure
arm: 106 configs -> no failure
arm64: 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2361
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
--
Regards
Sudip
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 19:10:27 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.4:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
59 tests: 59 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.4.228-rc1-ge538d4b64ed3
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <[email protected]>
Jon
On 12/15/22 10:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 447 pass: 447 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Guenter