2022-12-28 09:31:21

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [rft, PATCH v4 0/3] gpiolib: eventual of_node retirement

Now that all GPIO library users are converted to use fwnode,
Drop redundant field from struct gpio_chip and accompanying
code.

Bart, I prefer this series to go as soon as possible if you
have no objection. Or even as v6.2 material.

Thierry, can you please test it once again, so we will be sure
there is no breakage for OF platforms?

Cc: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>

v4: added couple of additional patches to the bundle that missed
the merge window by one or another reason

v3: rebased against latest Linux Next: expected not to fail now
(Also keeping in mind Thierry's report, so reworked a bit)

v2: resent against latest Linux Next: expected not to fail now
(Linux Next has no more users of of_node member of gpio_chip)

v1: to test for now (using CIs and build bots) what is left unconverted
(Expected to fail in some configurations!)

Andy Shevchenko (3):
gpiolib: Introduce gpio_device_get() and gpio_device_put()
gpiolib: Get rid of not used of_node member
gpiolib: sort header inclusion alphabetically

drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 10 -------
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.h | 4 ---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 21 ++++++-------
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 25 ++++------------
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.h | 5 ----
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h | 10 +++++++
include/linux/gpio/driver.h | 7 -----
8 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)


base-commit: 1b929c02afd37871d5afb9d498426f83432e71c2
--
2.35.1


2022-12-29 21:54:14

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 0/3] gpiolib: eventual of_node retirement

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:20 AM Andy Shevchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Now that all GPIO library users are converted to use fwnode,
> Drop redundant field from struct gpio_chip and accompanying
> code.

This is great stuff.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

2023-01-04 09:20:45

by Bartosz Golaszewski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 0/3] gpiolib: eventual of_node retirement

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:20 AM Andy Shevchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Now that all GPIO library users are converted to use fwnode,
> Drop redundant field from struct gpio_chip and accompanying
> code.
>
> Bart, I prefer this series to go as soon as possible if you
> have no objection. Or even as v6.2 material.
>
> Thierry, can you please test it once again, so we will be sure
> there is no breakage for OF platforms?
>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
>
> v4: added couple of additional patches to the bundle that missed
> the merge window by one or another reason
>
> v3: rebased against latest Linux Next: expected not to fail now
> (Also keeping in mind Thierry's report, so reworked a bit)
>
> v2: resent against latest Linux Next: expected not to fail now
> (Linux Next has no more users of of_node member of gpio_chip)
>
> v1: to test for now (using CIs and build bots) what is left unconverted
> (Expected to fail in some configurations!)
>
> Andy Shevchenko (3):
> gpiolib: Introduce gpio_device_get() and gpio_device_put()
> gpiolib: Get rid of not used of_node member
> gpiolib: sort header inclusion alphabetically
>
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 10 -------
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.h | 4 ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 21 ++++++-------
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 25 ++++------------
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.h | 5 ----
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h | 10 +++++++
> include/linux/gpio/driver.h | 7 -----
> 8 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 1b929c02afd37871d5afb9d498426f83432e71c2
> --
> 2.35.1
>

I applied the series, let's give it some time in next and see that
nothing breaks.

Bart

2023-01-04 17:04:46

by Thierry Reding

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 0/3] gpiolib: eventual of_node retirement

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 11:20:42AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Now that all GPIO library users are converted to use fwnode,
> Drop redundant field from struct gpio_chip and accompanying
> code.
>
> Bart, I prefer this series to go as soon as possible if you
> have no objection. Or even as v6.2 material.
>
> Thierry, can you please test it once again, so we will be sure
> there is no breakage for OF platforms?

Seems to be working fine on at least Jetson TX1, so:

Tested-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>


Attachments:
(No filename) (535.00 B)
signature.asc (849.00 B)
Download all attachments

2023-01-04 17:40:32

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 0/3] gpiolib: eventual of_node retirement

On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 05:41:46PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 11:20:42AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Now that all GPIO library users are converted to use fwnode,
> > Drop redundant field from struct gpio_chip and accompanying
> > code.
> >
> > Bart, I prefer this series to go as soon as possible if you
> > have no objection. Or even as v6.2 material.
> >
> > Thierry, can you please test it once again, so we will be sure
> > there is no breakage for OF platforms?
>
> Seems to be working fine on at least Jetson TX1, so:
>
> Tested-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>

Thank you and HNY!

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


2023-01-05 10:09:01

by Thierry Reding

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 0/3] gpiolib: eventual of_node retirement

On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 06:51:24PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 05:41:46PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 11:20:42AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Now that all GPIO library users are converted to use fwnode,
> > > Drop redundant field from struct gpio_chip and accompanying
> > > code.
> > >
> > > Bart, I prefer this series to go as soon as possible if you
> > > have no objection. Or even as v6.2 material.
> > >
> > > Thierry, can you please test it once again, so we will be sure
> > > there is no breakage for OF platforms?
> >
> > Seems to be working fine on at least Jetson TX1, so:
> >
> > Tested-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
>
> Thank you and HNY!

Happy New Year!

Thierry


Attachments:
(No filename) (780.00 B)
signature.asc (849.00 B)
Download all attachments