2021-03-16 17:24:10

by Thomas Gleixner

Subject: Re: [PATCH] softirq: Be more verbose on t->state BUG()

On Tue, Mar 16 2021 at 16:10, Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> If no other comments in the next days, I will resubmit your proposal as
> v2, marked with 'Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>'.
>
> Alternatively, feel free to author the patch and submit it with us in Cc.

Just send a v2 please

2021-03-17 10:29:00

by Eugeniu Rosca

Subject: Re: [PATCH] softirq: Be more verbose on t->state BUG()

Hello Thomas,

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 06:13:12PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16 2021 at 16:10, Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> > If no other comments in the next days, I will resubmit your proposal as
> > v2, marked with 'Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>'.
> >
> > Alternatively, feel free to author the patch and submit it with us in Cc.
>
> Just send a v2 please

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
("[PATCH v2] softirq: s/BUG/WARN_ONCE/ on tasklet SCHED state not set")

--
Best regards,
Eugeniu Rosca