On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:59:56PM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Min Li <[email protected]>
>
> This driver is developed for the IDT ClockMatrix(TM) and 82P33xxx families
> of timing and synchronization devices.It will be used by Renesas PTP Clock
> Manager for Linux (pcm4l) software to provide support to GNSS assisted
> partial timing support (APTS) and other networking timing functions.
>
> Current version provides kernel API's to support the following functions
> -set combomode to enable SYNCE clock support
> -read dpll's state to determine if the dpll is locked to the GNSS channel
> -read dpll's ffo (fractional frequency offset)
>
> Signed-off-by: Min Li <[email protected]>
Why the "net-next" in the subject line?
This is not for the network tree (given that you didn't even cc:
netdev...) or am I confused?
thanks,
gre gk-h
Hi Greg
You are right, this is not for the network tree.
Can you point me to the right tree to base this change for?
Thanks
Min
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
> Sent: March 17, 2021 3:20 PM
> To: Min Li <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] misc: Add Renesas Synchronization
> Management Unit (SMU) support
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:59:56PM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> > From: Min Li <[email protected]>
> >
> > This driver is developed for the IDT ClockMatrix(TM) and 82P33xxx
> > families of timing and synchronization devices.It will be used by
> > Renesas PTP Clock Manager for Linux (pcm4l) software to provide
> > support to GNSS assisted partial timing support (APTS) and other
> networking timing functions.
> >
> > Current version provides kernel API's to support the following
> > functions -set combomode to enable SYNCE clock support -read dpll's
> > state to determine if the dpll is locked to the GNSS channel -read
> > dpll's ffo (fractional frequency offset)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Min Li <[email protected]>
>
> Why the "net-next" in the subject line?
>
> This is not for the network tree (given that you didn't even cc:
> netdev...) or am I confused?
>
> thanks,
>
> gre gk-h
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 07:34:44PM +0000, Min Li wrote:
> Hi Greg
>
> You are right, this is not for the network tree.
>
> Can you point me to the right tree to base this change for?
MAINTAINERS and scripts/get_maintainers.pl is your friend, please look
there.
thanks,
greg k-h