2021-05-21 07:25:35

by Dmitry Monakhov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] blk-throttle: fix race between submitter and throttler thread

Changes since v1:
- Improve comments

Currently we call bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_THROTTLED) unconditionally
at the end of blk_throtl_bio w/o queue_lock. But once we drop queue_lock,
bio may already be processed by thottler thread, so both threads
may update bio->flags concurently

Dipite that race window is tiny, it happens in real life under heavy load.
It looks like follows:

SUBMITTER_THREAD (CPU1) THROTTLER_THREAD (CPU2)
->blk_throtl_bio
->throtl_add_bio_tg
(1) bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_THROTTLED);
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
->blk_throtl_dispatch_work_fn
(2)spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
->generic_make_request
->blk_queue_split
(3)bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_CHAINED)

(4) bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_THROTTLED);

Since bio->bi_flags is not atomic it will be cached on each CPU
CPU1 will cache it at the step (1), and changes from step(3) is not visiable,
so BIO_CHAINED flag will be lost and rewritten at step(4).
This result in ->bi_end_io() will be called multiple times once for each
chained bio and once for parent bio.

Bug#2: submit_bio_checks() call blkcg_bio_issue_init() for throttled bio,
but at this moment bio may be already be completed and freed by throttler thread

In order to fix both issues we should modify throttled bio under queue_lock only.

Fixes: 111be88398174 ("block-throttle: avoid double charge")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <[email protected]>

diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
index 50e579088aca..877d1fe77cc7 100644
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -273,10 +273,18 @@ void bio_reset(struct bio *bio)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_reset);

+/*
+ * Chained bios must have BIO_CHAIN flag set, see bio_chain().
+ * If this is not true when we break bio_endio() logic,
+ * and ->bi_end_io() will be called multiple times for parent bio
+ * which likely result in use-after-fee and silent data corruption.
+ */
static struct bio *__bio_chain_endio(struct bio *bio)
{
struct bio *parent = bio->bi_private;

+ BUG_ON(!bio_flagged(parent, BIO_CHAIN));
+
if (bio->bi_status && !parent->bi_status)
parent->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
bio_put(bio);
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index fc60ff208497..edc49e097ba1 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -886,7 +886,6 @@ static noinline_for_stack bool submit_bio_checks(struct bio *bio)
create_task_io_context(current, GFP_ATOMIC, q->node);

if (blk_throtl_bio(bio)) {
- blkcg_bio_issue_init(bio);
return false;
}

diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
index b1b22d863bdf..3d47feeb2e7d 100644
--- a/block/blk-throttle.c
+++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
@@ -2170,10 +2170,19 @@ static void throtl_update_latency_buckets(struct throtl_data *td)
td->avg_buckets[WRITE][i].latency,
td->avg_buckets[WRITE][i].valid);
}
+
+static inline void throtl_bio_skip_latency(struct bio *bio)
+{
+ bio->bi_issue.value |= BIO_ISSUE_THROTL_SKIP_LATENCY;
+}
#else
static inline void throtl_update_latency_buckets(struct throtl_data *td)
{
}
+
+static inline void throtl_bio_skip_latency(struct bio *bio)
+{
+}
#endif

bool blk_throtl_bio(struct bio *bio)
@@ -2187,20 +2196,26 @@ bool blk_throtl_bio(struct bio *bio)
bool throttled = false;
struct throtl_data *td = tg->td;

- rcu_read_lock();
+ if (!td->track_bio_latency)
+ throtl_bio_skip_latency(bio);

/* see throtl_charge_bio() */
if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_THROTTLED))
- goto out;
+ return false;

+ rcu_read_lock();
if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(io_cgrp_subsys)) {
blkg_rwstat_add(&tg->stat_bytes, bio->bi_opf,
bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
blkg_rwstat_add(&tg->stat_ios, bio->bi_opf, 1);
}

- if (!tg->has_rules[rw])
- goto out;
+
+ if (!tg->has_rules[rw]) {
+ bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_THROTTLED);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return false;
+ }

spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);

@@ -2268,8 +2283,15 @@ bool blk_throtl_bio(struct bio *bio)

tg->last_low_overflow_time[rw] = jiffies;

+ /*
+ * Once bio was added to throttler's list, we may assess this bio only
+ * while we hold ->queue_lock, otherwise throttler's thread may modify
+ * it under our feet.
+ */
td->nr_queued[rw]++;
throtl_add_bio_tg(bio, qn, tg);
+ blkcg_bio_issue_init(bio);
+ throtl_bio_skip_latency(bio);
throttled = true;

/*
@@ -2284,15 +2306,12 @@ bool blk_throtl_bio(struct bio *bio)
}

out_unlock:
- spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
-out:
- bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_THROTTLED);
+ if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_THROTTLED))
+ bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_THROTTLED);

-#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING_LOW
- if (throttled || !td->track_bio_latency)
- bio->bi_issue.value |= BIO_ISSUE_THROTL_SKIP_LATENCY;
-#endif
+ spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
+
return throttled;
}

--
2.7.4


2021-05-21 20:01:16

by Tejun Heo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-throttle: fix race between submitter and throttler thread

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:44:13PM +0000, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Changes since v1:
> - Improve comments
>
> Currently we call bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_THROTTLED) unconditionally
> at the end of blk_throtl_bio w/o queue_lock. But once we drop queue_lock,
> bio may already be processed by thottler thread, so both threads
> may update bio->flags concurently
>
> Dipite that race window is tiny, it happens in real life under heavy load.
> It looks like follows:
>
> SUBMITTER_THREAD (CPU1) THROTTLER_THREAD (CPU2)
> ->blk_throtl_bio
> ->throtl_add_bio_tg
> (1) bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_THROTTLED);
> spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> ->blk_throtl_dispatch_work_fn
> (2)spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> ->generic_make_request
> ->blk_queue_split
> (3)bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_CHAINED)
>
> (4) bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_THROTTLED);
>
> Since bio->bi_flags is not atomic it will be cached on each CPU
> CPU1 will cache it at the step (1), and changes from step(3) is not visiable,
> so BIO_CHAINED flag will be lost and rewritten at step(4).
> This result in ->bi_end_io() will be called multiple times once for each
> chained bio and once for parent bio.
>
> Bug#2: submit_bio_checks() call blkcg_bio_issue_init() for throttled bio,
> but at this moment bio may be already be completed and freed by throttler thread
>
> In order to fix both issues we should modify throttled bio under queue_lock only.
>
> Fixes: 111be88398174 ("block-throttle: avoid double charge")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>

Thanks.

--
tejun