Commit ce5e48036c9e("ftrace: disable preemption when recursion locked")
moved the preempt disabling/enabling code to
ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() and ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(), and
cleaned up all direct calls in the ftrace code. But it left s390 behind.
Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <[email protected]>
---
arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c
index 5510c7d10ddc..21d62d8b6b9a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -290,7 +290,6 @@ void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
return;
regs = ftrace_get_regs(fregs);
- preempt_disable_notrace();
p = get_kprobe((kprobe_opcode_t *)ip);
if (unlikely(!p) || kprobe_disabled(p))
goto out;
@@ -318,7 +317,6 @@ void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
}
__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
out:
- preempt_enable_notrace();
ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(bit);
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_ftrace_handler);
--
2.27.0
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 01:27:19PM -0300, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
> Commit ce5e48036c9e("ftrace: disable preemption when recursion locked")
> moved the preempt disabling/enabling code to
> ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() and ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(), and
> cleaned up all direct calls in the ftrace code. But it left s390 behind.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
Thanks, but I applied already this one:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]