From: Alex Shi <[email protected]>
This function could be full replaced by folio_is_file_lru, so no reason
to keep a duplicate function.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]>
Cc: Yu Zhao <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
---
include/linux/mm_inline.h | 5 -----
include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 2 +-
mm/compaction.c | 2 +-
mm/gup.c | 2 +-
mm/khugepaged.c | 4 ++--
mm/memory-failure.c | 2 +-
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +-
mm/mempolicy.c | 2 +-
mm/migrate.c | 14 +++++++-------
mm/mprotect.c | 2 +-
mm/vmscan.c | 13 +++++++------
11 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_inline.h b/include/linux/mm_inline.h
index b725839dfe71..f0aa34b0f2c4 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_inline.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_inline.h
@@ -27,11 +27,6 @@ static inline int folio_is_file_lru(struct folio *folio)
return !folio_test_swapbacked(folio);
}
-static inline int page_is_file_lru(struct page *page)
-{
- return folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page));
-}
-
static __always_inline void update_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec,
enum lru_list lru, enum zone_type zid,
long nr_pages)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
index ca2e9009a651..51a2b1766b05 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_writepage,
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
__entry->reclaim_flags = trace_reclaim_flags(
- page_is_file_lru(page));
+ folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)));
),
TP_printk("page=%p pfn=0x%lx flags=%s",
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index b4e94cda3019..12f2af6ac484 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -1066,7 +1066,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
/* Successfully isolated */
del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec);
mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page),
- NR_ISOLATED_ANON + page_is_file_lru(page),
+ NR_ISOLATED_ANON + folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)),
thp_nr_pages(page));
isolate_success:
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index f4c7645ccf8f..f3fea1efc2e2 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -1900,7 +1900,7 @@ static long check_and_migrate_movable_pages(unsigned long nr_pages,
list_add_tail(&head->lru, &movable_page_list);
mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(head),
NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
- page_is_file_lru(head),
+ folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(head)),
thp_nr_pages(head));
}
}
diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 35f14d0a00a6..8caed4089242 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ void __khugepaged_exit(struct mm_struct *mm)
static void release_pte_page(struct page *page)
{
mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page),
- NR_ISOLATED_ANON + page_is_file_lru(page),
+ NR_ISOLATED_ANON + folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)),
-compound_nr(page));
unlock_page(page);
putback_lru_page(page);
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
goto out;
}
mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page),
- NR_ISOLATED_ANON + page_is_file_lru(page),
+ NR_ISOLATED_ANON + folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)),
compound_nr(page));
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page), page);
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 14ae5c18e776..9405388ab852 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -2113,7 +2113,7 @@ static bool isolate_page(struct page *page, struct list_head *pagelist)
if (isolated && lru)
inc_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
- page_is_file_lru(page));
+ folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)));
/*
* If we succeed to isolate the page, we grabbed another refcount on
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 0139b77c51d5..94b0d14da0af 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1731,7 +1731,7 @@ do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
list_add_tail(&page->lru, &source);
if (!__PageMovable(page))
inc_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
- page_is_file_lru(page));
+ folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)));
} else {
if (__ratelimit(&migrate_rs)) {
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index a86590b2507d..f5c3c86d7c31 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static int migrate_page_add(struct page *page, struct list_head *pagelist,
if (!isolate_lru_page(head)) {
list_add_tail(&head->lru, pagelist);
mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(head),
- NR_ISOLATED_ANON + page_is_file_lru(head),
+ NR_ISOLATED_ANON + folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(head)),
thp_nr_pages(head));
} else if (flags & MPOL_MF_STRICT) {
/*
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index c7da064b4781..bdd7425556db 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ void putback_movable_pages(struct list_head *l)
put_page(page);
} else {
mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
- page_is_file_lru(page), -thp_nr_pages(page));
+ folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)), -thp_nr_pages(page));
putback_lru_page(page);
}
}
@@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page,
*/
if (likely(!__PageMovable(page)))
mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
- page_is_file_lru(page), -thp_nr_pages(page));
+ folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)), -thp_nr_pages(page));
if (reason != MR_MEMORY_FAILURE)
/*
@@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@ static int add_page_for_migration(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
err = 1;
list_add_tail(&head->lru, pagelist);
mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(head),
- NR_ISOLATED_ANON + page_is_file_lru(head),
+ NR_ISOLATED_ANON + folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(head)),
thp_nr_pages(head));
}
out_putpage:
@@ -2048,7 +2048,7 @@ static int numamigrate_isolate_page(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct page *page)
if (isolate_lru_page(page))
return 0;
- page_lru = page_is_file_lru(page);
+ page_lru = folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page));
mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), NR_ISOLATED_ANON + page_lru,
nr_pages);
@@ -2093,7 +2093,7 @@ int migrate_misplaced_page(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* Don't migrate file pages that are mapped in multiple processes
* with execute permissions as they are probably shared libraries.
*/
- if (page_mapcount(page) != 1 && page_is_file_lru(page) &&
+ if (page_mapcount(page) != 1 && folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)) &&
(vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC))
goto out;
@@ -2101,7 +2101,7 @@ int migrate_misplaced_page(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* Also do not migrate dirty pages as not all filesystems can move
* dirty pages in MIGRATE_ASYNC mode which is a waste of cycles.
*/
- if (page_is_file_lru(page) && PageDirty(page))
+ if (folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)) && PageDirty(page))
goto out;
isolated = numamigrate_isolate_page(pgdat, page);
@@ -2115,7 +2115,7 @@ int migrate_misplaced_page(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
if (!list_empty(&migratepages)) {
list_del(&page->lru);
mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
- page_is_file_lru(page), -nr_pages);
+ folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)), -nr_pages);
putback_lru_page(page);
}
isolated = 0;
diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index 0138dfcdb1d8..31d1270deb4f 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
* it cannot move them all from MIGRATE_ASYNC
* context.
*/
- if (page_is_file_lru(page) && PageDirty(page))
+ if (folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)) && PageDirty(page))
continue;
/*
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 0dbfa3a69567..c361973774b4 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1311,7 +1311,7 @@ static int __remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page,
* exceptional entries and shadow exceptional entries in the
* same address_space.
*/
- if (reclaimed && page_is_file_lru(page) &&
+ if (reclaimed && folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)) &&
!mapping_exiting(mapping) && !dax_mapping(mapping))
shadow = workingset_eviction(page, target_memcg);
__delete_from_page_cache(page, shadow);
@@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@ static void page_check_dirty_writeback(struct page *page,
* Anonymous pages are not handled by flushers and must be written
* from reclaim context. Do not stall reclaim based on them
*/
- if (!page_is_file_lru(page) ||
+ if (!folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)) ||
(PageAnon(page) && !PageSwapBacked(page))) {
*dirty = false;
*writeback = false;
@@ -1777,7 +1777,7 @@ static unsigned int shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
* the rest of the LRU for clean pages and see
* the same dirty pages again (PageReclaim).
*/
- if (page_is_file_lru(page) &&
+ if (folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)) &&
(!current_is_kswapd() || !PageReclaim(page) ||
!test_bit(PGDAT_DIRTY, &pgdat->flags))) {
/*
@@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ static unsigned int shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
try_to_free_swap(page);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageActive(page), page);
if (!PageMlocked(page)) {
- int type = page_is_file_lru(page);
+ int type = folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page));
SetPageActive(page);
stat->nr_activate[type] += nr_pages;
count_memcg_page_event(page, PGACTIVATE);
@@ -1976,7 +1976,7 @@ unsigned int reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
unsigned int noreclaim_flag;
list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, page_list, lru) {
- if (!PageHuge(page) && page_is_file_lru(page) &&
+ if (!PageHuge(page) && folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page)) &&
!PageDirty(page) && !__PageMovable(page) &&
!PageUnevictable(page)) {
ClearPageActive(page);
@@ -2555,7 +2555,8 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
* IO, plus JVM can create lots of anon VM_EXEC pages,
* so we ignore them here.
*/
- if ((vm_flags & VM_EXEC) && page_is_file_lru(page)) {
+ if ((vm_flags & VM_EXEC) &&
+ folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page))) {
nr_rotated += thp_nr_pages(page);
list_add(&page->lru, &l_active);
continue;
--
2.25.1
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 09:10:20PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Alex Shi <[email protected]>
>
> This function could be full replaced by folio_is_file_lru, so no reason
> to keep a duplicate function.
This is not a helpful way to do this kind of replacement.
Instead of choosing a function to remove and doing a blind replacement,
choose a call site and convert the whole calling function to use folios.
Once you've removed all callers, you can remove the wrapper function.
Also, a number of changes here will conflict with patches I've already
posted. Try doing change_pte_range() in mprotect.c to get a feel for
how to convert a function entirely to folios.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 9:28 PM Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 09:10:20PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> > From: Alex Shi <[email protected]>
> >
> > This function could be full replaced by folio_is_file_lru, so no reason
> > to keep a duplicate function.
>
> This is not a helpful way to do this kind of replacement.
>
> Instead of choosing a function to remove and doing a blind replacement,
> choose a call site and convert the whole calling function to use folios.
> Once you've removed all callers, you can remove the wrapper function.
>
> Also, a number of changes here will conflict with patches I've already
> posted. Try doing change_pte_range() in mprotect.c to get a feel for
> how to convert a function entirely to folios.
Hi Willy,
Thanks for your comments!
The patchset did the thing as you required "convert the whole calling
function to use folios. then remove the wrapper function" on yesterday's
Linus and next tree, that included your patchset "Page cache/iomap for 5.17".
Is the conflicting patch "Enabling large folios for 5.17" or others? Sorry
for can't check everyone, your patches are many. If just the former, I see
you mentioned: "I'd be uncomfortable seeing it merged before 5.18".
Would you point out which of your patches was interfered or blocked?
And yes, replacing page functions in change_pte_range is a bit harder,
but it seems it has no much relation with this trival patchset.
Thanks
Alex
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 03:02:12PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 9:28 PM Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 09:10:20PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> > > From: Alex Shi <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > This function could be full replaced by folio_is_file_lru, so no reason
> > > to keep a duplicate function.
> >
> > This is not a helpful way to do this kind of replacement.
> >
> > Instead of choosing a function to remove and doing a blind replacement,
> > choose a call site and convert the whole calling function to use folios.
> > Once you've removed all callers, you can remove the wrapper function.
> >
> > Also, a number of changes here will conflict with patches I've already
> > posted. Try doing change_pte_range() in mprotect.c to get a feel for
> > how to convert a function entirely to folios.
>
> Hi Willy,
>
> Thanks for your comments!
>
> The patchset did the thing as you required "convert the whole calling
> function to use folios. then remove the wrapper function" on yesterday's
> Linus and next tree, that included your patchset "Page cache/iomap for 5.17".
That's not what I meant. What I meant is you're currently doing:
- Find folio wrapper function
- Inline it into all callers
- Delete wrapper function
That creates a lot of churn and not a lot of improvement.
What would be helpful is doing:
- Find folio wrapper function
- Find a caller, convert it from using pages to using folios
That's harder, but it actually accomplishes something (ie auditing
a function to make it work with folios). These wrapper functions are
signals that the callers need to be converted to use folios.
> Is the conflicting patch "Enabling large folios for 5.17" or others? Sorry
> for can't check everyone, your patches are many. If just the former, I see
> you mentioned: "I'd be uncomfortable seeing it merged before 5.18".
> Would you point out which of your patches was interfered or blocked?
The GUP series was the specific series that this conflicted with.
And yes, I have a lot of patches outstanding in this area. That's a
sign that small cleanup patches aren't going to be welcomed because
they're going to conflict with meaningful patches.
> And yes, replacing page functions in change_pte_range is a bit harder,
> but it seems it has no much relation with this trival patchset.
That is, indeed, the point.