2022-03-04 20:26:09

by patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Add support for 1588 in LAN8814

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by David S. Miller <[email protected]>:

On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 15:04:15 +0530 you wrote:
> The following patch series contains:
> - Fix for concurrent register access, which provides
> atomic access to extended page register reads/writes.
> - Provides dt-bindings related to latency and timestamping
> that are required for LAN8814 phy.
> - 1588 hardware timestamping support in LAN8814 phy.
>
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,1/3] net: phy: micrel: Fix concurrent register access
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/4488f6b61480
- [net-next,2/3] dt-bindings: net: micrel: Configure latency values and timestamping check for LAN8814 phy
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2358dd3fd325
- [net-next,3/3] net: phy: micrel: 1588 support for LAN8814 phy
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ece19502834d

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



2022-03-04 20:48:28

by Andrew Lunn

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Add support for 1588 in LAN8814

On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 12:50:11PM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> Hello:
>
> This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
> by David S. Miller <[email protected]>:

Hi David

Why was this merged?

Andrew

2022-03-17 19:47:54

by Michael Walle

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Add support for 1588 in LAN8814

From: [email protected]

> Here is the summary with links:
> - [net-next,1/3] net: phy: micrel: Fix concurrent register access
> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/4488f6b61480
> - [net-next,2/3] dt-bindings: net: micrel: Configure latency values and timestamping check for LAN8814 phy
> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2358dd3fd325
> - [net-next,3/3] net: phy: micrel: 1588 support for LAN8814 phy
> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ece19502834d

I'm almost afraid to ask.. but will this series be reverted (or
the device tree bindings patch)? There were quite a few remarks, even
about the naming of the properties. So, will it be part of the next
kernel release or will it be reverted?

-michael