2022-03-09 13:25:22

by Sudeep Holla

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] arm64: dts: Juno CTI device tree additions

On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 11:31:16AM +0000, Mike Leach wrote:
> This is a resend of a patch from some time ago (04/2020)[1] which seems to
> have fallen through the cracks - most likely as last time I mistakenly
> tagged it as dt-bindings: rather than dts:
>

Quite likely, but I vaguely remember this and I assume the bindings had
on-going discussions at that time.

> I am planning a release of additional CTI configuration examples, which
> include some for Juno - so this is now needed upstream to support that work.
>
> Patch unchanged, other than a correction to the subject.
>

That may not work. I haven't tried applying but it would be good to
post it rebasing on -next at this moment or after v5.18-rc1 is released.
I have already sent v5.18 material, so I need to queue this for v5.19.
So preferable post the rebase version at v5.18-rc1 in 2+ weeks time.
We have had some restructuring including the new scmi version of DTB
in the mainline or queued in -next at the moment.

Sorry for missing this last time.

> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/
>
>
> Mike Leach (1):
> arm64: dts: arm: Juno - add CTI entries to device tree
>

No need of the cover letter for one patch, just post the patch next time.

--
Regards,
Sudeep


2022-03-09 16:05:05

by Mike Leach

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] arm64: dts: Juno CTI device tree additions

Hi Sudeep,

On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 11:50, Sudeep Holla <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 11:31:16AM +0000, Mike Leach wrote:
> > This is a resend of a patch from some time ago (04/2020)[1] which seems to
> > have fallen through the cracks - most likely as last time I mistakenly
> > tagged it as dt-bindings: rather than dts:
> >
>
> Quite likely, but I vaguely remember this and I assume the bindings had
> on-going discussions at that time.
>
> > I am planning a release of additional CTI configuration examples, which
> > include some for Juno - so this is now needed upstream to support that work.
> >
> > Patch unchanged, other than a correction to the subject.
> >
>
> That may not work. I haven't tried applying but it would be good to
> post it rebasing on -next at this moment or after v5.18-rc1 is released.
> I have already sent v5.18 material, so I need to queue this for v5.19.
> So preferable post the rebase version at v5.18-rc1 in 2+ weeks time.
> We have had some restructuring including the new scmi version of DTB
> in the mainline or queued in -next at the moment.
>

I did check it on coresight/next (5.17-rc3) and it was fine.

However re-doing for 5.18 is no problem as anything that depends on it
will be on there or later anyway.

Will rebase and repost when 5.18-rc1 becomes available.

Thanks

Mike

> Sorry for missing this last time.
>
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/
> >
> >
> > Mike Leach (1):
> > arm64: dts: arm: Juno - add CTI entries to device tree
> >
>
> No need of the cover letter for one patch, just post the patch next time.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep



--
Mike Leach
Principal Engineer, ARM Ltd.
Manchester Design Centre. UK