On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 04:01:04PM +0800, Haowen Bai wrote:
> Fix following coccicheck warning:
> drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c:1112:25-26: WARNING opportunity for min()
>
> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c
> index 9ce5a71..bb2a527 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c
> @@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ static int ep11_wrapkey(u16 card, u16 domain,
> if (kb->head.type == TOKTYPE_NON_CCA &&
> kb->head.version == TOKVER_EP11_AES) {
> has_header = true;
> - keysize = kb->head.len < keysize ? kb->head.len : keysize;
> + keysize = min((size_t)kb->head.len, keysize);
I would assume that checkpatch will now warn that this is an
opportunity to use min_t()...
Anyway, it is up to Harald to decide what do with this.
hi, Heiko
Thank you for your reply and suggestion.
________________________________________
??????: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
????ʱ??: 2022??3??15?? 17:15:51
?ռ???: ????
????: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
????: Re: [PATCH v2] s390: crypto: Use min() instead of doing it manually
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 04:01:04PM +0800, Haowen Bai wrote:
> Fix following coccicheck warning:
> drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c:1112:25-26: WARNING opportunity for min()
>
> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c
> index 9ce5a71..bb2a527 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c
> @@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ static int ep11_wrapkey(u16 card, u16 domain,
> if (kb->head.type == TOKTYPE_NON_CCA &&
> kb->head.version == TOKVER_EP11_AES) {
> has_header = true;
> - keysize = kb->head.len < keysize ? kb->head.len : keysize;
> + keysize = min((size_t)kb->head.len, keysize);
I would assume that checkpatch will now warn that this is an
opportunity to use min_t()...
Anyway, it is up to Harald to decide what do with this.