Document the compatible for the UFS found on SM6350.
Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- add second hunk for clock validation
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
index 5b3a2157f7e5..dcd32c10205a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ properties:
- qcom,msm8996-ufshc
- qcom,msm8998-ufshc
- qcom,sdm845-ufshc
+ - qcom,sm6350-ufshc
- qcom,sm8150-ufshc
- qcom,sm8250-ufshc
- qcom,sm8350-ufshc
@@ -125,6 +126,7 @@ allOf:
contains:
enum:
- qcom,sdm845-ufshc
+ - qcom,sm6350-ufshc
- qcom,sm8150-ufshc
then:
properties:
--
2.35.1
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Luca Weiss [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 7:03 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: ~postmarketos/[email protected]; [email protected];
>Luca Weiss <[email protected]>; Andy Gross <[email protected]>;
>Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>; Alim Akhtar
><[email protected]>; Avri Altman <[email protected]>; Rob
>Herring <[email protected]>; Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>;
>[email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
>[email protected]
>Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] scsi: ufs: dt-bindings: Add SM6350 compatible
string
>
>Document the compatible for the UFS found on SM6350.
>
>Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
>---
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <[email protected]>
>Changes in v2:
>- add second hunk for clock validation
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>index 5b3a2157f7e5..dcd32c10205a 100644
>--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ properties:
> - qcom,msm8996-ufshc
> - qcom,msm8998-ufshc
> - qcom,sdm845-ufshc
>+ - qcom,sm6350-ufshc
> - qcom,sm8150-ufshc
> - qcom,sm8250-ufshc
> - qcom,sm8350-ufshc
>@@ -125,6 +126,7 @@ allOf:
> contains:
> enum:
> - qcom,sdm845-ufshc
>+ - qcom,sm6350-ufshc
> - qcom,sm8150-ufshc
> then:
> properties:
>--
>2.35.1
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 02:33:13PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Document the compatible for the UFS found on SM6350.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - add second hunk for clock validation
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Are maintainers supposed to know that this is dependent on a patch in my
tree? After a week of vacation I don't even remember that without
checking.
Rob
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:33:13 +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Document the compatible for the UFS found on SM6350.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - add second hunk for clock validation
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
Applied, thanks!