Singleton chunks (INIT, HEARTBEAT PMTU probes, and SHUTDOWN-
COMPLETE) are not counted in SCTP_GET_ASOC_STATS "sas_octrlchunks"
counter available to the assoc owner.
These are all control chunks so they should be counted as such.
Add counting of singleton chunks so they are properly accounted for.
Fixes: 196d67593439 ("sctp: Add support to per-association statistics via a new SCTP_GET_ASSOC_STATS call")
Signed-off-by: Jamie Bainbridge <[email protected]>
---
net/sctp/outqueue.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
index a18609f608fb786b2532a4febbd72a9737ab906c..bed34918b41f24810677adc0cd4fbd0859396a02 100644
--- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c
+++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
@@ -914,6 +914,7 @@ static void sctp_outq_flush_ctrl(struct sctp_flush_ctx *ctx)
ctx->asoc->base.sk->sk_err = -error;
return;
}
+ ctx->asoc->stats.octrlchunks++;
break;
case SCTP_CID_ABORT:
@@ -939,6 +940,7 @@ static void sctp_outq_flush_ctrl(struct sctp_flush_ctx *ctx)
case SCTP_CID_HEARTBEAT:
if (chunk->pmtu_probe) {
sctp_packet_singleton(ctx->transport, chunk, ctx->gfp);
+ ctx->asoc->stats.octrlchunks++;
break;
}
fallthrough;
--
2.35.1
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 01:06:02PM +1000, Jamie Bainbridge wrote:
> Singleton chunks (INIT, HEARTBEAT PMTU probes, and SHUTDOWN-
> COMPLETE) are not counted in SCTP_GET_ASOC_STATS "sas_octrlchunks"
> counter available to the assoc owner.
>
> These are all control chunks so they should be counted as such.
>
> Add counting of singleton chunks so they are properly accounted for.
>
> Fixes: 196d67593439 ("sctp: Add support to per-association statistics via a new SCTP_GET_ASSOC_STATS call")
> Signed-off-by: Jamie Bainbridge <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/sctp/outqueue.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> index a18609f608fb786b2532a4febbd72a9737ab906c..bed34918b41f24810677adc0cd4fbd0859396a02 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> @@ -914,6 +914,7 @@ static void sctp_outq_flush_ctrl(struct sctp_flush_ctx *ctx)
> ctx->asoc->base.sk->sk_err = -error;
> return;
> }
> + ctx->asoc->stats.octrlchunks++;
> break;
>
> case SCTP_CID_ABORT:
> @@ -939,6 +940,7 @@ static void sctp_outq_flush_ctrl(struct sctp_flush_ctx *ctx)
> case SCTP_CID_HEARTBEAT:
> if (chunk->pmtu_probe) {
> sctp_packet_singleton(ctx->transport, chunk, ctx->gfp);
> + ctx->asoc->stats.octrlchunks++;
sctp_packet_singleton can fail. It shouldn't be propagated to the
socket but octrlchunks shouldn't be incremented then. Not too diferent
from the one above.
> break;
> }
> fallthrough;
> --
> 2.35.1
>
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 10:09:56AM +1000, Jamie Bainbridge wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 05:44, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 01:06:02PM +1000, Jamie Bainbridge wrote:
> > > Singleton chunks (INIT, HEARTBEAT PMTU probes, and SHUTDOWN-
> > > COMPLETE) are not counted in SCTP_GET_ASOC_STATS "sas_octrlchunks"
> > > counter available to the assoc owner.
> > >
> > > These are all control chunks so they should be counted as such.
> > >
> > > Add counting of singleton chunks so they are properly accounted for.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 196d67593439 ("sctp: Add support to per-association statistics via a new SCTP_GET_ASSOC_STATS call")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jamie Bainbridge <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > net/sctp/outqueue.c | 2 ++
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> > > index a18609f608fb786b2532a4febbd72a9737ab906c..bed34918b41f24810677adc0cd4fbd0859396a02 100644
> > > --- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> > > +++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> > > @@ -914,6 +914,7 @@ static void sctp_outq_flush_ctrl(struct sctp_flush_ctx *ctx)
> > > ctx->asoc->base.sk->sk_err = -error;
> > > return;
> > > }
> > > + ctx->asoc->stats.octrlchunks++;
> > > break;
> > >
> > > case SCTP_CID_ABORT:
> > > @@ -939,6 +940,7 @@ static void sctp_outq_flush_ctrl(struct sctp_flush_ctx *ctx)
> > > case SCTP_CID_HEARTBEAT:
> > > if (chunk->pmtu_probe) {
> > > sctp_packet_singleton(ctx->transport, chunk, ctx->gfp);
> > > + ctx->asoc->stats.octrlchunks++;
> >
> > sctp_packet_singleton can fail. It shouldn't be propagated to the
> > socket but octrlchunks shouldn't be incremented then. Not too diferent
> > from the one above.
>
> Ah, thanks for the catch! Is this syntax assigning to error okay?
>
> error = sctp_packet_singleton(ctx->transport, chunk, ctx->gfp);
> if (!error)
> ctx->asoc->stats.octrlchunks++;
> break;
Yes. :-)
>
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > fallthrough;
> > > --
> > > 2.35.1
> > >
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 05:44, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 01:06:02PM +1000, Jamie Bainbridge wrote:
> > Singleton chunks (INIT, HEARTBEAT PMTU probes, and SHUTDOWN-
> > COMPLETE) are not counted in SCTP_GET_ASOC_STATS "sas_octrlchunks"
> > counter available to the assoc owner.
> >
> > These are all control chunks so they should be counted as such.
> >
> > Add counting of singleton chunks so they are properly accounted for.
> >
> > Fixes: 196d67593439 ("sctp: Add support to per-association statistics via a new SCTP_GET_ASSOC_STATS call")
> > Signed-off-by: Jamie Bainbridge <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > net/sctp/outqueue.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> > index a18609f608fb786b2532a4febbd72a9737ab906c..bed34918b41f24810677adc0cd4fbd0859396a02 100644
> > --- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> > @@ -914,6 +914,7 @@ static void sctp_outq_flush_ctrl(struct sctp_flush_ctx *ctx)
> > ctx->asoc->base.sk->sk_err = -error;
> > return;
> > }
> > + ctx->asoc->stats.octrlchunks++;
> > break;
> >
> > case SCTP_CID_ABORT:
> > @@ -939,6 +940,7 @@ static void sctp_outq_flush_ctrl(struct sctp_flush_ctx *ctx)
> > case SCTP_CID_HEARTBEAT:
> > if (chunk->pmtu_probe) {
> > sctp_packet_singleton(ctx->transport, chunk, ctx->gfp);
> > + ctx->asoc->stats.octrlchunks++;
>
> sctp_packet_singleton can fail. It shouldn't be propagated to the
> socket but octrlchunks shouldn't be incremented then. Not too diferent
> from the one above.
Ah, thanks for the catch! Is this syntax assigning to error okay?
error = sctp_packet_singleton(ctx->transport, chunk, ctx->gfp);
if (!error)
ctx->asoc->stats.octrlchunks++;
break;
> > break;
> > }
> > fallthrough;
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >