2022-05-02 22:51:52

by Kalesh Singh

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: arm64: Compile stacktrace.nvhe.o

Recompile stack unwinding code for use with the nVHE hypervisor. This is
a preparatory patch that will allow reusing most of the kernel unwinding
logic in the nVHE hypervisor.

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <[email protected]>
---

Changes in v2:
- Split out refactoring of common unwinding logic into a separate patch,
per Mark Brown

arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 18 +++++++++-----
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++-------------
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index aec9315bf156..f5af9a94c5a6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -16,12 +16,14 @@
#include <asm/sdei.h>

enum stack_type {
- STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN,
+#ifndef __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__
STACK_TYPE_TASK,
STACK_TYPE_IRQ,
STACK_TYPE_OVERFLOW,
STACK_TYPE_SDEI_NORMAL,
STACK_TYPE_SDEI_CRITICAL,
+#endif /* !__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */
+ STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN,
__NR_STACK_TYPES
};

@@ -31,11 +33,6 @@ struct stack_info {
enum stack_type type;
};

-extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
- const char *loglvl);
-
-DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long *, irq_stack_ptr);
-
static inline bool on_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
unsigned long low, unsigned long high,
enum stack_type type, struct stack_info *info)
@@ -54,6 +51,12 @@ static inline bool on_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
return true;
}

+#ifndef __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__
+extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
+ const char *loglvl);
+
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long *, irq_stack_ptr);
+
static inline bool on_irq_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
struct stack_info *info)
{
@@ -88,6 +91,7 @@ static inline bool on_overflow_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
static inline bool on_overflow_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
struct stack_info *info) { return false; }
#endif
+#endif /* !__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */


/*
@@ -101,6 +105,7 @@ static inline bool on_accessible_stack(const struct task_struct *tsk,
if (info)
info->type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;

+#ifndef __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__
if (on_task_stack(tsk, sp, size, info))
return true;
if (tsk != current || preemptible())
@@ -111,6 +116,7 @@ static inline bool on_accessible_stack(const struct task_struct *tsk,
return true;
if (on_sdei_stack(sp, size, info))
return true;
+#endif /* !__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */

return false;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index ee60c279511c..a84e38d41d38 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -129,6 +129,26 @@ static int notrace __unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(__unwind_next);

+static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ struct unwind_state *state);
+
+static void notrace unwind(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ struct unwind_state *state,
+ stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie)
+{
+ while (1) {
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!consume_entry(cookie, state->pc))
+ break;
+ ret = unwind_next(tsk, state);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ break;
+ }
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind);
+
+#ifndef __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__
static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
struct unwind_state *state)
{
@@ -171,22 +191,6 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);

-static void notrace unwind(struct task_struct *tsk,
- struct unwind_state *state,
- stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie)
-{
- while (1) {
- int ret;
-
- if (!consume_entry(cookie, state->pc))
- break;
- ret = unwind_next(tsk, state);
- if (ret < 0)
- break;
- }
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind);
-
static bool dump_backtrace_entry(void *arg, unsigned long where)
{
char *loglvl = arg;
@@ -238,3 +242,4 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,

unwind(task, &state, consume_entry, cookie);
}
+#endif /* !__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile
index f9fe4dc21b1f..c0ff0d6fc403 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ lib-objs := $(addprefix ../../../lib/, $(lib-objs))

obj-y := timer-sr.o sysreg-sr.o debug-sr.o switch.o tlb.o hyp-init.o host.o \
hyp-main.o hyp-smp.o psci-relay.o early_alloc.o page_alloc.o \
- cache.o setup.o mm.o mem_protect.o sys_regs.o pkvm.o
+ cache.o setup.o mm.o mem_protect.o sys_regs.o pkvm.o \
+ ../../../kernel/stacktrace.o
obj-y += ../vgic-v3-sr.o ../aarch32.o ../vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.o ../entry.o \
../fpsimd.o ../hyp-entry.o ../exception.o ../pgtable.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST) += list_debug.o
--
2.36.0.464.gb9c8b46e94-goog


2022-05-04 17:52:25

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: arm64: Compile stacktrace.nvhe.o

On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 12:12:02PM -0700, Kalesh Singh wrote:

> Recompile stack unwinding code for use with the nVHE hypervisor. This is
> a preparatory patch that will allow reusing most of the kernel unwinding
> logic in the nVHE hypervisor.

> enum stack_type {
> - STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN,
> +#ifndef __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__
> STACK_TYPE_TASK,
> STACK_TYPE_IRQ,
> STACK_TYPE_OVERFLOW,
> STACK_TYPE_SDEI_NORMAL,
> STACK_TYPE_SDEI_CRITICAL,
> +#endif /* !__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */
> + STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN,
> __NR_STACK_TYPES
> };

I don't immediately see a problem with it but I'm curious as to why
STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN got moved to the end of the list here? It does mean
that zeroed memory will default to STACK_TYPE_TASK but we're not
actually relying on that. Otherwise

Reviwed-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>


Attachments:
(No filename) (855.00 B)
signature.asc (499.00 B)
Download all attachments

2022-05-05 19:48:34

by Kalesh Singh

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: arm64: Compile stacktrace.nvhe.o

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 7:17 AM Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 12:12:02PM -0700, Kalesh Singh wrote:
>
> > Recompile stack unwinding code for use with the nVHE hypervisor. This is
> > a preparatory patch that will allow reusing most of the kernel unwinding
> > logic in the nVHE hypervisor.
>
> > enum stack_type {
> > - STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN,
> > +#ifndef __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__
> > STACK_TYPE_TASK,
> > STACK_TYPE_IRQ,
> > STACK_TYPE_OVERFLOW,
> > STACK_TYPE_SDEI_NORMAL,
> > STACK_TYPE_SDEI_CRITICAL,
> > +#endif /* !__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */
> > + STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN,
> > __NR_STACK_TYPES
> > };
>
> I don't immediately see a problem with it but I'm curious as to why
> STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN got moved to the end of the list here? It does mean
> that zeroed memory will default to STACK_TYPE_TASK but we're not
> actually relying on that. Otherwise

Hi Mark. Thanks for the reviews.

STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN was moved to the end purely to group the common
enum values. Not a functionality change as we don't reply on an
uninitialized stack_type

Thanks,
Kalesh

>
> Reviwed-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].