Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the pci tree got a conflict in:
arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
between commit:
bb356ddb78b2 ("RISC-V: PCI: Avoid handing out address 0 to devices")
from the risc-v tree and commit:
a2912b45b082 ("asm-generic: Add new pci.h and use it")
from the pci tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
index 830ac621dbbc,6ef4a1426194..000000000000
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
@@@ -12,31 -12,7 +12,10 @@@
#include <asm/io.h>
+#define PCIBIOS_MIN_IO 4
+#define PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM 16
+
- /* RISC-V shim does not initialize PCI bus */
- #define pcibios_assign_all_busses() 1
-
- #define ARCH_GENERIC_PCI_MMAP_RESOURCE 1
-
- extern int isa_dma_bridge_buggy;
-
- #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
- static inline int pci_get_legacy_ide_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int channel)
- {
- /* no legacy IRQ on risc-v */
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-
- static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
- {
- /* always show the domain in /proc */
- return 1;
- }
-
- #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-
+ #if defined(CONFIG_PCI) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
static inline int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
return dev_to_node(&bus->dev);
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 10:22:21AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the pci tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
>
> between commit:
>
> bb356ddb78b2 ("RISC-V: PCI: Avoid handing out address 0 to devices")
>
> from the risc-v tree and commit:
>
> a2912b45b082 ("asm-generic: Add new pci.h and use it")
>
> from the pci tree.
Hi Stephen,
We had anticipated this and I believe Palmer should be merging the pci changes
to his branch to resolve the merge conflict before sending the changes upstream.
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
> index 830ac621dbbc,6ef4a1426194..000000000000
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
> @@@ -12,31 -12,7 +12,10 @@@
>
> #include <asm/io.h>
>
> +#define PCIBIOS_MIN_IO 4
> +#define PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM 16
> +
> - /* RISC-V shim does not initialize PCI bus */
> - #define pcibios_assign_all_busses() 1
> -
> - #define ARCH_GENERIC_PCI_MMAP_RESOURCE 1
> -
> - extern int isa_dma_bridge_buggy;
> -
> - #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> - static inline int pci_get_legacy_ide_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int channel)
> - {
> - /* no legacy IRQ on risc-v */
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> -
> - static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
> - {
> - /* always show the domain in /proc */
> - return 1;
> - }
> -
> - #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> -
> + #if defined(CONFIG_PCI) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
> static inline int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *bus)
> {
> return dev_to_node(&bus->dev);
Your conflict resolution patch looks good to me.
-Stafford