This patch switches the driver to use newer gpiod API instead of legacy
gpio API. This moves us closer to the goal of stopping exporting
OF-specific APIs of gpiolib.
While at it, stop using module-global for regmap.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c b/drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c
index 92df2c2c5d07..4ae790d00fd6 100644
--- a/drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c
+++ b/drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
* Copyright (C) 2005 David Brownell
*/
+#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
@@ -12,14 +13,13 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/sizes.h>
#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
#include <linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-mc.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
-#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
@@ -36,18 +36,17 @@
#define CF_MEM_PHYS (0x017ff800)
struct at91_cf_data {
- int irq_pin; /* I/O IRQ */
- int det_pin; /* Card detect */
- int vcc_pin; /* power switching */
- int rst_pin; /* card reset */
+ struct gpio_desc *irq_pin; /* I/O IRQ */
+ struct gpio_desc *det_pin; /* Card detect */
+ struct gpio_desc *vcc_pin; /* power switching */
+ struct gpio_desc *rst_pin; /* card reset */
+ struct regmap *mc;
u8 chipselect; /* EBI Chip Select number */
u8 flags;
#define AT91_CF_TRUE_IDE 0x01
#define AT91_IDE_SWAP_A0_A2 0x02
};
-struct regmap *mc;
-
/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
struct at91_cf_socket {
@@ -63,7 +62,7 @@ struct at91_cf_socket {
static inline int at91_cf_present(struct at91_cf_socket *cf)
{
- return !gpio_get_value(cf->board->det_pin);
+ return gpiod_get_value(cf->board->det_pin);
}
/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
@@ -77,7 +76,7 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_cf_irq(int irq, void *_cf)
{
struct at91_cf_socket *cf = _cf;
- if (irq == gpio_to_irq(cf->board->det_pin)) {
+ if (irq == gpiod_to_irq(cf->board->det_pin)) {
unsigned present = at91_cf_present(cf);
/* kick pccard as needed */
@@ -103,16 +102,15 @@ static int at91_cf_get_status(struct pcmcia_socket *s, u_int *sp)
/* NOTE: CF is always 3VCARD */
if (at91_cf_present(cf)) {
- int rdy = gpio_is_valid(cf->board->irq_pin); /* RDY/nIRQ */
- int vcc = gpio_is_valid(cf->board->vcc_pin);
-
*sp = SS_DETECT | SS_3VCARD;
- if (!rdy || gpio_get_value(cf->board->irq_pin))
+ /* RDY/nIRQ */
+ if (!cf->board->irq_pin || gpiod_get_value(cf->board->irq_pin))
*sp |= SS_READY;
- if (!vcc || gpio_get_value(cf->board->vcc_pin))
+ if (!cf->board->vcc_pin || gpiod_get_value(cf->board->vcc_pin))
*sp |= SS_POWERON;
- } else
+ } else {
*sp = 0;
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -125,13 +123,13 @@ at91_cf_set_socket(struct pcmcia_socket *sock, struct socket_state_t *s)
cf = container_of(sock, struct at91_cf_socket, socket);
/* switch Vcc if needed and possible */
- if (gpio_is_valid(cf->board->vcc_pin)) {
+ if (cf->board->vcc_pin) {
switch (s->Vcc) {
case 0:
- gpio_set_value(cf->board->vcc_pin, 0);
+ gpiod_set_value(cf->board->vcc_pin, 0);
break;
case 33:
- gpio_set_value(cf->board->vcc_pin, 1);
+ gpiod_set_value(cf->board->vcc_pin, 1);
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
@@ -139,7 +137,7 @@ at91_cf_set_socket(struct pcmcia_socket *sock, struct socket_state_t *s)
}
/* toggle reset if needed */
- gpio_set_value(cf->board->rst_pin, s->flags & SS_RESET);
+ gpiod_set_value(cf->board->rst_pin, s->flags & SS_RESET);
dev_dbg(&cf->pdev->dev, "Vcc %d, io_irq %d, flags %04x csc %04x\n",
s->Vcc, s->io_irq, s->flags, s->csc_mask);
@@ -180,7 +178,8 @@ static int at91_cf_set_io_map(struct pcmcia_socket *s, struct pccard_io_map *io)
csr = AT91_MC_SMC_DBW_16;
dev_dbg(&cf->pdev->dev, "16bit i/o bus\n");
}
- regmap_update_bits(mc, AT91_MC_SMC_CSR(cf->board->chipselect),
+ regmap_update_bits(cf->board->mc,
+ AT91_MC_SMC_CSR(cf->board->chipselect),
AT91_MC_SMC_DBW, csr);
io->start = cf->socket.io_offset;
@@ -238,17 +237,9 @@ static int at91_cf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!board)
return -ENOMEM;
- board->irq_pin = of_get_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
- board->det_pin = of_get_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, 1);
- board->vcc_pin = of_get_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, 2);
- board->rst_pin = of_get_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, 3);
-
- mc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91rm9200-sdramc");
- if (IS_ERR(mc))
- return PTR_ERR(mc);
-
- if (!gpio_is_valid(board->det_pin) || !gpio_is_valid(board->rst_pin))
- return -ENODEV;
+ board->mc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91rm9200-sdramc");
+ if (IS_ERR(board->mc))
+ return PTR_ERR(board->mc);
io = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
if (!io)
@@ -264,26 +255,34 @@ static int at91_cf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cf);
/* must be a GPIO; ergo must trigger on both edges */
- status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, board->det_pin, "cf_det");
- if (status < 0)
+ board->det_pin = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, NULL, 1, GPIOD_IN);
+ status = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(board->det_pin);
+ if (status)
return status;
- status = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, gpio_to_irq(board->det_pin),
+ gpiod_set_consumer_name(board->det_pin, "cf_det");
+
+ status = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, gpiod_to_irq(board->det_pin),
at91_cf_irq, 0, "at91_cf detect", cf);
if (status < 0)
return status;
device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
- status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, board->rst_pin, "cf_rst");
- if (status < 0)
+ board->rst_pin = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, NULL, 3, GPIOD_ASIS);
+ status = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(board->rst_pin);
+ if (status)
goto fail0a;
- if (gpio_is_valid(board->vcc_pin)) {
- status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, board->vcc_pin, "cf_vcc");
- if (status < 0)
- goto fail0a;
- }
+ gpiod_set_consumer_name(board->rst_pin, "cf_rst");
+
+ board->vcc_pin = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(&pdev->dev,
+ NULL, 2, GPIOD_ASIS);
+ status = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(board->rst_pin);
+ if (status)
+ goto fail0a;
+
+ gpiod_set_consumer_name(board->vcc_pin, "cf_vcc");
/*
* The card driver will request this irq later as needed.
@@ -291,18 +290,23 @@ static int at91_cf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* unless we report that we handle everything (sigh).
* (Note: DK board doesn't wire the IRQ pin...)
*/
- if (gpio_is_valid(board->irq_pin)) {
- status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, board->irq_pin, "cf_irq");
- if (status < 0)
- goto fail0a;
+ board->irq_pin = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(&pdev->dev,
+ NULL, 0, GPIOD_IN);
+ status = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(board->irq_pin);
+ if (status)
+ goto fail0a;
- status = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin),
+ if (board->irq_pin) {
+ gpiod_set_consumer_name(board->irq_pin, "cf_irq");
+
+ status = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, gpiod_to_irq(board->irq_pin),
at91_cf_irq, IRQF_SHARED, "at91_cf", cf);
if (status < 0)
goto fail0a;
- cf->socket.pci_irq = gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin);
- } else
+ cf->socket.pci_irq = gpiod_to_irq(board->irq_pin);
+ } else {
cf->socket.pci_irq = nr_irqs + 1;
+ }
/*
* pcmcia layer only remaps "real" memory not iospace
@@ -322,7 +326,7 @@ static int at91_cf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "irqs det #%d, io #%d\n",
- gpio_to_irq(board->det_pin), gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin));
+ gpiod_to_irq(board->det_pin), gpiod_to_irq(board->irq_pin));
cf->socket.owner = THIS_MODULE;
cf->socket.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
@@ -362,9 +366,9 @@ static int at91_cf_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t mesg)
struct at91_cf_data *board = cf->board;
if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev)) {
- enable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(board->det_pin));
- if (gpio_is_valid(board->irq_pin))
- enable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin));
+ enable_irq_wake(gpiod_to_irq(board->det_pin));
+ if (board->irq_pin)
+ enable_irq_wake(gpiod_to_irq(board->irq_pin));
}
return 0;
}
@@ -375,9 +379,9 @@ static int at91_cf_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct at91_cf_data *board = cf->board;
if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev)) {
- disable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(board->det_pin));
- if (gpio_is_valid(board->irq_pin))
- disable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin));
+ disable_irq_wake(gpiod_to_irq(board->det_pin));
+ if (board->irq_pin)
+ disable_irq_wake(gpiod_to_irq(board->irq_pin));
}
return 0;
--
2.30.2
--
Dmitry
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022, at 8:04 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> This patch switches the driver to use newer gpiod API instead of legacy
> gpio API. This moves us closer to the goal of stopping exporting
> OF-specific APIs of gpiolib.
>
> While at it, stop using module-global for regmap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
This looks good to me overall. Three comments:
> @@ -63,7 +62,7 @@ struct at91_cf_socket {
>
> static inline int at91_cf_present(struct at91_cf_socket *cf)
> {
> - return !gpio_get_value(cf->board->det_pin);
> + return gpiod_get_value(cf->board->det_pin);
> }
a) The change in polarity looks wrong here, I can't really tell
from the patch. If this is intentional, maybe explain it in
the changelog. With that addressed (either way)
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
b) In case you are doing more patches like this one at the moment,
note that I'm in the process of removing all unused board files
for arch/arm/, which will in turn make a lot of drivers unused.
I should be able to provide a branch soon, which can be used to
identify drivers that don't have DT support any more and don't
have any board files. Rather than converting them to gpio
descriptors, we can probably just remove those drivers.
c) I'm not sure about the state of the at91_cf driver. Apparently
we used to have three drivers for the same hardware (pcmcia,
pata and ide), and only the pcmcia driver remained in the tree
after drivers/ide/ was removed and pata_at91 did not get converted
to DT. I think in the long run we will remove the pcmcia layer,
so if you are actually trying to use this hardware, we may want to
revive the pata variant and drop this one instead.
There is no dts file in tree that actually declares either of them,
so chances are that nobody is actually using the CF slot on at91
any more.
Arnd
On 24/09/2022 10:33:29+0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2022, at 8:04 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > This patch switches the driver to use newer gpiod API instead of legacy
> > gpio API. This moves us closer to the goal of stopping exporting
> > OF-specific APIs of gpiolib.
> >
> > While at it, stop using module-global for regmap.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
>
> This looks good to me overall. Three comments:
>
> > @@ -63,7 +62,7 @@ struct at91_cf_socket {
> >
> > static inline int at91_cf_present(struct at91_cf_socket *cf)
> > {
> > - return !gpio_get_value(cf->board->det_pin);
> > + return gpiod_get_value(cf->board->det_pin);
> > }
>
> a) The change in polarity looks wrong here, I can't really tell
> from the patch. If this is intentional, maybe explain it in
> the changelog. With that addressed (either way)
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>
>
> b) In case you are doing more patches like this one at the moment,
> note that I'm in the process of removing all unused board files
> for arch/arm/, which will in turn make a lot of drivers unused.
> I should be able to provide a branch soon, which can be used to
> identify drivers that don't have DT support any more and don't
> have any board files. Rather than converting them to gpio
> descriptors, we can probably just remove those drivers.
>
> c) I'm not sure about the state of the at91_cf driver. Apparently
> we used to have three drivers for the same hardware (pcmcia,
> pata and ide), and only the pcmcia driver remained in the tree
> after drivers/ide/ was removed and pata_at91 did not get converted
> to DT. I think in the long run we will remove the pcmcia layer,
> so if you are actually trying to use this hardware, we may want to
> revive the pata variant and drop this one instead.
> There is no dts file in tree that actually declares either of them,
> so chances are that nobody is actually using the CF slot on at91
> any more.
>
I'm pretty sure it is broken since eaa9a21dd14b ("pcmcia: at91_cf: Use
syscon to configure the MC/smc") as this change has never been tested.
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Am Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 01:42:37PM +0200 schrieb Alexandre Belloni:
> On 24/09/2022 10:33:29+0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2022, at 8:04 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > This patch switches the driver to use newer gpiod API instead of legacy
> > > gpio API. This moves us closer to the goal of stopping exporting
> > > OF-specific APIs of gpiolib.
> > >
> > > While at it, stop using module-global for regmap.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
> >
> > This looks good to me overall. Three comments:
> >
> > > @@ -63,7 +62,7 @@ struct at91_cf_socket {
> > >
> > > static inline int at91_cf_present(struct at91_cf_socket *cf)
> > > {
> > > - return !gpio_get_value(cf->board->det_pin);
> > > + return gpiod_get_value(cf->board->det_pin);
> > > }
> >
> > a) The change in polarity looks wrong here, I can't really tell
> > from the patch. If this is intentional, maybe explain it in
> > the changelog. With that addressed (either way)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> > b) In case you are doing more patches like this one at the moment,
> > note that I'm in the process of removing all unused board files
> > for arch/arm/, which will in turn make a lot of drivers unused.
> > I should be able to provide a branch soon, which can be used to
> > identify drivers that don't have DT support any more and don't
> > have any board files. Rather than converting them to gpio
> > descriptors, we can probably just remove those drivers.
> >
> > c) I'm not sure about the state of the at91_cf driver. Apparently
> > we used to have three drivers for the same hardware (pcmcia,
> > pata and ide), and only the pcmcia driver remained in the tree
> > after drivers/ide/ was removed and pata_at91 did not get converted
> > to DT. I think in the long run we will remove the pcmcia layer,
> > so if you are actually trying to use this hardware, we may want to
> > revive the pata variant and drop this one instead.
> > There is no dts file in tree that actually declares either of them,
> > so chances are that nobody is actually using the CF slot on at91
> > any more.
> >
>
> I'm pretty sure it is broken since eaa9a21dd14b ("pcmcia: at91_cf: Use
> syscon to configure the MC/smc") as this change has never been tested.
Well, that's a pretty strong reason to remove this driver. May I get ACKs on
this patch, please?
Thanks,
Dominik
From: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia: remove AT91RM9200 Compact Flash driver
As noted by Arnd Bergmann, "we used to have three drivers for the same
hardware (pcmcia, pata and ide), and only the pcmcia driver remained
in the tree after drivers/ide/ was removed and pata_at91 did not get
converted to DT". "There is no dts file in tree that actually declares
either of them, so chances are that nobody is actually using the CF
slot on at91 any more."[1]
On this rationale, remove the AT91RM9200 Compact Flash driver, which
also assists in reaching "the goal of stopping exporting OF-specific
APIs of gpiolib".[2]
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yy6d7TjqzUwGQnQa@penguin/
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig b/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig
index 90ebc688ec05..1525023e49b6 100644
--- a/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig
@@ -248,15 +248,6 @@ config OMAP_CF
Say Y here to support the CompactFlash controller on OMAP.
Note that this doesn't support "True IDE" mode.
-config AT91_CF
- tristate "AT91 CompactFlash Controller"
- depends on PCI
- depends on OF
- depends on PCMCIA && ARCH_AT91
- help
- Say Y here to support the CompactFlash controller on AT91 chips.
- Or choose M to compile the driver as a module named "at91_cf".
-
config ELECTRA_CF
tristate "Electra CompactFlash Controller"
depends on PCMCIA && PPC_PASEMI
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/Makefile b/drivers/pcmcia/Makefile
index 1c3ae8888e5f..b3a2accf47af 100644
--- a/drivers/pcmcia/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pcmcia/Makefile
@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA_SA1100) += sa1100_cs.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA_SA1111) += sa1111_cs.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA_BCM63XX) += bcm63xx_pcmcia.o
obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_CF) += omap_cf.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_AT91_CF) += at91_cf.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ELECTRA_CF) += electra_cf.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA_ALCHEMY_DEVBOARD) += db1xxx_ss.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA_MAX1600) += max1600.o
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c b/drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c
deleted file mode 100644
index c1297f0ebf03..000000000000
--- a/drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,407 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
-/*
- * at91_cf.c -- AT91 CompactFlash controller driver
- *
- * Copyright (C) 2005 David Brownell
- */
-
-#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/errno.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/interrupt.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/gpio.h>
-#include <linux/io.h>
-#include <linux/sizes.h>
-#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
-#include <linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-mc.h>
-#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
-#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
-#include <linux/pci.h>
-#include <linux/regmap.h>
-
-#include <pcmcia/ss.h>
-
-/*
- * A0..A10 work in each range; A23 indicates I/O space; A25 is CFRNW;
- * some other bit in {A24,A22..A11} is nREG to flag memory access
- * (vs attributes). So more than 2KB/region would just be waste.
- * Note: These are offsets from the physical base address.
- */
-#define CF_ATTR_PHYS (0)
-#define CF_IO_PHYS (1 << 23)
-#define CF_MEM_PHYS (0x017ff800)
-
-struct at91_cf_data {
- int irq_pin; /* I/O IRQ */
- int det_pin; /* Card detect */
- int vcc_pin; /* power switching */
- int rst_pin; /* card reset */
- u8 chipselect; /* EBI Chip Select number */
- u8 flags;
-#define AT91_CF_TRUE_IDE 0x01
-#define AT91_IDE_SWAP_A0_A2 0x02
-};
-
-static struct regmap *mc;
-
-/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
-
-struct at91_cf_socket {
- struct pcmcia_socket socket;
-
- unsigned present:1;
-
- struct platform_device *pdev;
- struct at91_cf_data *board;
-
- unsigned long phys_baseaddr;
-};
-
-static inline int at91_cf_present(struct at91_cf_socket *cf)
-{
- return !gpio_get_value(cf->board->det_pin);
-}
-
-/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
-
-static int at91_cf_ss_init(struct pcmcia_socket *s)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static irqreturn_t at91_cf_irq(int irq, void *_cf)
-{
- struct at91_cf_socket *cf = _cf;
-
- if (irq == gpio_to_irq(cf->board->det_pin)) {
- unsigned present = at91_cf_present(cf);
-
- /* kick pccard as needed */
- if (present != cf->present) {
- cf->present = present;
- dev_dbg(&cf->pdev->dev, "card %s\n",
- present ? "present" : "gone");
- pcmcia_parse_events(&cf->socket, SS_DETECT);
- }
- }
-
- return IRQ_HANDLED;
-}
-
-static int at91_cf_get_status(struct pcmcia_socket *s, u_int *sp)
-{
- struct at91_cf_socket *cf;
-
- if (!sp)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- cf = container_of(s, struct at91_cf_socket, socket);
-
- /* NOTE: CF is always 3VCARD */
- if (at91_cf_present(cf)) {
- int rdy = gpio_is_valid(cf->board->irq_pin); /* RDY/nIRQ */
- int vcc = gpio_is_valid(cf->board->vcc_pin);
-
- *sp = SS_DETECT | SS_3VCARD;
- if (!rdy || gpio_get_value(cf->board->irq_pin))
- *sp |= SS_READY;
- if (!vcc || gpio_get_value(cf->board->vcc_pin))
- *sp |= SS_POWERON;
- } else
- *sp = 0;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-at91_cf_set_socket(struct pcmcia_socket *sock, struct socket_state_t *s)
-{
- struct at91_cf_socket *cf;
-
- cf = container_of(sock, struct at91_cf_socket, socket);
-
- /* switch Vcc if needed and possible */
- if (gpio_is_valid(cf->board->vcc_pin)) {
- switch (s->Vcc) {
- case 0:
- gpio_set_value(cf->board->vcc_pin, 0);
- break;
- case 33:
- gpio_set_value(cf->board->vcc_pin, 1);
- break;
- default:
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- }
-
- /* toggle reset if needed */
- gpio_set_value(cf->board->rst_pin, s->flags & SS_RESET);
-
- dev_dbg(&cf->pdev->dev, "Vcc %d, io_irq %d, flags %04x csc %04x\n",
- s->Vcc, s->io_irq, s->flags, s->csc_mask);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int at91_cf_ss_suspend(struct pcmcia_socket *s)
-{
- return at91_cf_set_socket(s, &dead_socket);
-}
-
-/* we already mapped the I/O region */
-static int at91_cf_set_io_map(struct pcmcia_socket *s, struct pccard_io_map *io)
-{
- struct at91_cf_socket *cf;
- u32 csr;
-
- cf = container_of(s, struct at91_cf_socket, socket);
- io->flags &= (MAP_ACTIVE | MAP_16BIT | MAP_AUTOSZ);
-
- /*
- * Use 16 bit accesses unless/until we need 8-bit i/o space.
- *
- * NOTE: this CF controller ignores IOIS16, so we can't really do
- * MAP_AUTOSZ. The 16bit mode allows single byte access on either
- * D0-D7 (even addr) or D8-D15 (odd), so it's close enough for many
- * purposes (and handles ide-cs).
- *
- * The 8bit mode is needed for odd byte access on D0-D7. It seems
- * some cards only like that way to get at the odd byte, despite
- * CF 3.0 spec table 35 also giving the D8-D15 option.
- */
- if (!(io->flags & (MAP_16BIT | MAP_AUTOSZ))) {
- csr = AT91_MC_SMC_DBW_8;
- dev_dbg(&cf->pdev->dev, "8bit i/o bus\n");
- } else {
- csr = AT91_MC_SMC_DBW_16;
- dev_dbg(&cf->pdev->dev, "16bit i/o bus\n");
- }
- regmap_update_bits(mc, AT91_MC_SMC_CSR(cf->board->chipselect),
- AT91_MC_SMC_DBW, csr);
-
- io->start = cf->socket.io_offset;
- io->stop = io->start + SZ_2K - 1;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-/* pcmcia layer maps/unmaps mem regions */
-static int
-at91_cf_set_mem_map(struct pcmcia_socket *s, struct pccard_mem_map *map)
-{
- struct at91_cf_socket *cf;
-
- if (map->card_start)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- cf = container_of(s, struct at91_cf_socket, socket);
-
- map->flags &= (MAP_ACTIVE | MAP_ATTRIB | MAP_16BIT);
- if (map->flags & MAP_ATTRIB)
- map->static_start = cf->phys_baseaddr + CF_ATTR_PHYS;
- else
- map->static_start = cf->phys_baseaddr + CF_MEM_PHYS;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static struct pccard_operations at91_cf_ops = {
- .init = at91_cf_ss_init,
- .suspend = at91_cf_ss_suspend,
- .get_status = at91_cf_get_status,
- .set_socket = at91_cf_set_socket,
- .set_io_map = at91_cf_set_io_map,
- .set_mem_map = at91_cf_set_mem_map,
-};
-
-/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
-
-static const struct of_device_id at91_cf_dt_ids[] = {
- { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-cf" },
- { /* sentinel */ }
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at91_cf_dt_ids);
-
-static int at91_cf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
- struct at91_cf_socket *cf;
- struct at91_cf_data *board;
- struct resource *io;
- struct resource realio;
- int status;
-
- board = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*board), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!board)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- board->irq_pin = of_get_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
- board->det_pin = of_get_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, 1);
- board->vcc_pin = of_get_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, 2);
- board->rst_pin = of_get_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, 3);
-
- mc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91rm9200-sdramc");
- if (IS_ERR(mc))
- return PTR_ERR(mc);
-
- if (!gpio_is_valid(board->det_pin) || !gpio_is_valid(board->rst_pin))
- return -ENODEV;
-
- io = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
- if (!io)
- return -ENODEV;
-
- cf = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cf), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!cf)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- cf->board = board;
- cf->pdev = pdev;
- cf->phys_baseaddr = io->start;
- platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cf);
-
- /* must be a GPIO; ergo must trigger on both edges */
- status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, board->det_pin, "cf_det");
- if (status < 0)
- return status;
-
- status = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, gpio_to_irq(board->det_pin),
- at91_cf_irq, 0, "at91_cf detect", cf);
- if (status < 0)
- return status;
-
- device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
-
- status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, board->rst_pin, "cf_rst");
- if (status < 0)
- goto fail0a;
-
- if (gpio_is_valid(board->vcc_pin)) {
- status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, board->vcc_pin, "cf_vcc");
- if (status < 0)
- goto fail0a;
- }
-
- /*
- * The card driver will request this irq later as needed.
- * but it causes lots of "irqNN: nobody cared" messages
- * unless we report that we handle everything (sigh).
- * (Note: DK board doesn't wire the IRQ pin...)
- */
- if (gpio_is_valid(board->irq_pin)) {
- status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, board->irq_pin, "cf_irq");
- if (status < 0)
- goto fail0a;
-
- status = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin),
- at91_cf_irq, IRQF_SHARED, "at91_cf", cf);
- if (status < 0)
- goto fail0a;
- cf->socket.pci_irq = gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin);
- } else
- cf->socket.pci_irq = nr_irqs + 1;
-
- /*
- * pcmcia layer only remaps "real" memory not iospace
- * io_offset is set to 0x10000 to avoid the check in static_find_io().
- * */
- cf->socket.io_offset = 0x10000;
- realio.start = cf->socket.io_offset;
- realio.end = realio.start + SZ_64K - 1;
- status = pci_remap_iospace(&realio, cf->phys_baseaddr + CF_IO_PHYS);
- if (status)
- goto fail0a;
-
- /* reserve chip-select regions */
- if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, io->start, resource_size(io), "at91_cf")) {
- status = -ENXIO;
- goto fail0a;
- }
-
- dev_info(&pdev->dev, "irqs det #%d, io #%d\n",
- gpio_to_irq(board->det_pin), gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin));
-
- cf->socket.owner = THIS_MODULE;
- cf->socket.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
- cf->socket.ops = &at91_cf_ops;
- cf->socket.resource_ops = &pccard_static_ops;
- cf->socket.features = SS_CAP_PCCARD | SS_CAP_STATIC_MAP
- | SS_CAP_MEM_ALIGN;
- cf->socket.map_size = SZ_2K;
- cf->socket.io[0].res = io;
-
- status = pcmcia_register_socket(&cf->socket);
- if (status < 0)
- goto fail0a;
-
- return 0;
-
-fail0a:
- device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 0);
- return status;
-}
-
-static int at91_cf_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
- struct at91_cf_socket *cf = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-
- pcmcia_unregister_socket(&cf->socket);
- device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 0);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM
-
-static int at91_cf_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t mesg)
-{
- struct at91_cf_socket *cf = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- struct at91_cf_data *board = cf->board;
-
- if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev)) {
- enable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(board->det_pin));
- if (gpio_is_valid(board->irq_pin))
- enable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin));
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int at91_cf_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
- struct at91_cf_socket *cf = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- struct at91_cf_data *board = cf->board;
-
- if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev)) {
- disable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(board->det_pin));
- if (gpio_is_valid(board->irq_pin))
- disable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin));
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-#else
-#define at91_cf_suspend NULL
-#define at91_cf_resume NULL
-#endif
-
-static struct platform_driver at91_cf_driver = {
- .driver = {
- .name = "at91_cf",
- .of_match_table = at91_cf_dt_ids,
- },
- .probe = at91_cf_probe,
- .remove = at91_cf_remove,
- .suspend = at91_cf_suspend,
- .resume = at91_cf_resume,
-};
-
-module_platform_driver(at91_cf_driver);
-
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("AT91 Compact Flash Driver");
-MODULE_AUTHOR("David Brownell");
-MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-MODULE_ALIAS("platform:at91_cf");
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 04:17:20PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Am Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 01:42:37PM +0200 schrieb Alexandre Belloni:
> > On 24/09/2022 10:33:29+0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2022, at 8:04 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > This patch switches the driver to use newer gpiod API instead of legacy
> > > > gpio API. This moves us closer to the goal of stopping exporting
> > > > OF-specific APIs of gpiolib.
> > > >
> > > > While at it, stop using module-global for regmap.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > This looks good to me overall. Three comments:
> > >
> > > > @@ -63,7 +62,7 @@ struct at91_cf_socket {
> > > >
> > > > static inline int at91_cf_present(struct at91_cf_socket *cf)
> > > > {
> > > > - return !gpio_get_value(cf->board->det_pin);
> > > > + return gpiod_get_value(cf->board->det_pin);
> > > > }
> > >
> > > a) The change in polarity looks wrong here, I can't really tell
> > > from the patch. If this is intentional, maybe explain it in
> > > the changelog. With that addressed (either way)
Oh, yes, you are right. I at first thought that card detect pin might be
active low, was not able to confirm it, but forgot to restore polarity.
Anyway, I think this does not matter given Dominik's patch below.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> > >
> > >
> > > b) In case you are doing more patches like this one at the moment,
> > > note that I'm in the process of removing all unused board files
> > > for arch/arm/, which will in turn make a lot of drivers unused.
> > > I should be able to provide a branch soon, which can be used to
> > > identify drivers that don't have DT support any more and don't
> > > have any board files. Rather than converting them to gpio
> > > descriptors, we can probably just remove those drivers.
> > >
> > > c) I'm not sure about the state of the at91_cf driver. Apparently
> > > we used to have three drivers for the same hardware (pcmcia,
> > > pata and ide), and only the pcmcia driver remained in the tree
> > > after drivers/ide/ was removed and pata_at91 did not get converted
> > > to DT. I think in the long run we will remove the pcmcia layer,
> > > so if you are actually trying to use this hardware, we may want to
> > > revive the pata variant and drop this one instead.
Nope, I am interested in dropping legacy gpio API, that is all.
> > > There is no dts file in tree that actually declares either of them,
> > > so chances are that nobody is actually using the CF slot on at91
> > > any more.
> > >
> >
> > I'm pretty sure it is broken since eaa9a21dd14b ("pcmcia: at91_cf: Use
> > syscon to configure the MC/smc") as this change has never been tested.
>
> Well, that's a pretty strong reason to remove this driver. May I get ACKs on
> this patch, please?
Not sure if this is worth anything, but
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 4:19 PM Dominik Brodowski
<[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia: remove AT91RM9200 Compact Flash driver
>
> As noted by Arnd Bergmann, "we used to have three drivers for the same
> hardware (pcmcia, pata and ide), and only the pcmcia driver remained
> in the tree after drivers/ide/ was removed and pata_at91 did not get
> converted to DT". "There is no dts file in tree that actually declares
> either of them, so chances are that nobody is actually using the CF
> slot on at91 any more."[1]
>
> On this rationale, remove the AT91RM9200 Compact Flash driver, which
> also assists in reaching "the goal of stopping exporting OF-specific
> APIs of gpiolib".[2]
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yy6d7TjqzUwGQnQa@penguin/
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
If someone actually has an AT91 board with this hardware and
want to be able to use it by converting this driver to device tree,
this is the time to step up.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On 24/09/2022 16:17:20+0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Am Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 01:42:37PM +0200 schrieb Alexandre Belloni:
> > On 24/09/2022 10:33:29+0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2022, at 8:04 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > This patch switches the driver to use newer gpiod API instead of legacy
> > > > gpio API. This moves us closer to the goal of stopping exporting
> > > > OF-specific APIs of gpiolib.
> > > >
> > > > While at it, stop using module-global for regmap.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > This looks good to me overall. Three comments:
> > >
> > > > @@ -63,7 +62,7 @@ struct at91_cf_socket {
> > > >
> > > > static inline int at91_cf_present(struct at91_cf_socket *cf)
> > > > {
> > > > - return !gpio_get_value(cf->board->det_pin);
> > > > + return gpiod_get_value(cf->board->det_pin);
> > > > }
> > >
> > > a) The change in polarity looks wrong here, I can't really tell
> > > from the patch. If this is intentional, maybe explain it in
> > > the changelog. With that addressed (either way)
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> > >
> > >
> > > b) In case you are doing more patches like this one at the moment,
> > > note that I'm in the process of removing all unused board files
> > > for arch/arm/, which will in turn make a lot of drivers unused.
> > > I should be able to provide a branch soon, which can be used to
> > > identify drivers that don't have DT support any more and don't
> > > have any board files. Rather than converting them to gpio
> > > descriptors, we can probably just remove those drivers.
> > >
> > > c) I'm not sure about the state of the at91_cf driver. Apparently
> > > we used to have three drivers for the same hardware (pcmcia,
> > > pata and ide), and only the pcmcia driver remained in the tree
> > > after drivers/ide/ was removed and pata_at91 did not get converted
> > > to DT. I think in the long run we will remove the pcmcia layer,
> > > so if you are actually trying to use this hardware, we may want to
> > > revive the pata variant and drop this one instead.
> > > There is no dts file in tree that actually declares either of them,
> > > so chances are that nobody is actually using the CF slot on at91
> > > any more.
> > >
> >
> > I'm pretty sure it is broken since eaa9a21dd14b ("pcmcia: at91_cf: Use
> > syscon to configure the MC/smc") as this change has never been tested.
>
> Well, that's a pretty strong reason to remove this driver. May I get ACKs on
> this patch, please?
>
> Thanks,
> Dominik
>
>
> From: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia: remove AT91RM9200 Compact Flash driver
>
> As noted by Arnd Bergmann, "we used to have three drivers for the same
> hardware (pcmcia, pata and ide), and only the pcmcia driver remained
> in the tree after drivers/ide/ was removed and pata_at91 did not get
> converted to DT". "There is no dts file in tree that actually declares
> either of them, so chances are that nobody is actually using the CF
> slot on at91 any more."[1]
>
> On this rationale, remove the AT91RM9200 Compact Flash driver, which
> also assists in reaching "the goal of stopping exporting OF-specific
> APIs of gpiolib".[2]
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yy6d7TjqzUwGQnQa@penguin/
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]>
> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig b/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig
> index 90ebc688ec05..1525023e49b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig
> @@ -248,15 +248,6 @@ config OMAP_CF
> Say Y here to support the CompactFlash controller on OMAP.
> Note that this doesn't support "True IDE" mode.
>
> -config AT91_CF
> - tristate "AT91 CompactFlash Controller"
> - depends on PCI
> - depends on OF
> - depends on PCMCIA && ARCH_AT91
> - help
> - Say Y here to support the CompactFlash controller on AT91 chips.
> - Or choose M to compile the driver as a module named "at91_cf".
> -
> config ELECTRA_CF
> tristate "Electra CompactFlash Controller"
> depends on PCMCIA && PPC_PASEMI
> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/Makefile b/drivers/pcmcia/Makefile
> index 1c3ae8888e5f..b3a2accf47af 100644
> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/Makefile
> @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA_SA1100) += sa1100_cs.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA_SA1111) += sa1111_cs.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA_BCM63XX) += bcm63xx_pcmcia.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_CF) += omap_cf.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_AT91_CF) += at91_cf.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ELECTRA_CF) += electra_cf.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA_ALCHEMY_DEVBOARD) += db1xxx_ss.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA_MAX1600) += max1600.o
> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c b/drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c
> deleted file mode 100644
> index c1297f0ebf03..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,407 +0,0 @@
> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> -/*
> - * at91_cf.c -- AT91 CompactFlash controller driver
> - *
> - * Copyright (C) 2005 David Brownell
> - */
> -
> -#include <linux/module.h>
> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> -#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> -#include <linux/errno.h>
> -#include <linux/init.h>
> -#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> -#include <linux/slab.h>
> -#include <linux/gpio.h>
> -#include <linux/io.h>
> -#include <linux/sizes.h>
> -#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> -#include <linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-mc.h>
> -#include <linux/of.h>
> -#include <linux/of_device.h>
> -#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> -#include <linux/pci.h>
> -#include <linux/regmap.h>
> -
> -#include <pcmcia/ss.h>
> -
> -/*
> - * A0..A10 work in each range; A23 indicates I/O space; A25 is CFRNW;
> - * some other bit in {A24,A22..A11} is nREG to flag memory access
> - * (vs attributes). So more than 2KB/region would just be waste.
> - * Note: These are offsets from the physical base address.
> - */
> -#define CF_ATTR_PHYS (0)
> -#define CF_IO_PHYS (1 << 23)
> -#define CF_MEM_PHYS (0x017ff800)
> -
> -struct at91_cf_data {
> - int irq_pin; /* I/O IRQ */
> - int det_pin; /* Card detect */
> - int vcc_pin; /* power switching */
> - int rst_pin; /* card reset */
> - u8 chipselect; /* EBI Chip Select number */
> - u8 flags;
> -#define AT91_CF_TRUE_IDE 0x01
> -#define AT91_IDE_SWAP_A0_A2 0x02
> -};
> -
> -static struct regmap *mc;
> -
> -/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> -
> -struct at91_cf_socket {
> - struct pcmcia_socket socket;
> -
> - unsigned present:1;
> -
> - struct platform_device *pdev;
> - struct at91_cf_data *board;
> -
> - unsigned long phys_baseaddr;
> -};
> -
> -static inline int at91_cf_present(struct at91_cf_socket *cf)
> -{
> - return !gpio_get_value(cf->board->det_pin);
> -}
> -
> -/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> -
> -static int at91_cf_ss_init(struct pcmcia_socket *s)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static irqreturn_t at91_cf_irq(int irq, void *_cf)
> -{
> - struct at91_cf_socket *cf = _cf;
> -
> - if (irq == gpio_to_irq(cf->board->det_pin)) {
> - unsigned present = at91_cf_present(cf);
> -
> - /* kick pccard as needed */
> - if (present != cf->present) {
> - cf->present = present;
> - dev_dbg(&cf->pdev->dev, "card %s\n",
> - present ? "present" : "gone");
> - pcmcia_parse_events(&cf->socket, SS_DETECT);
> - }
> - }
> -
> - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> -}
> -
> -static int at91_cf_get_status(struct pcmcia_socket *s, u_int *sp)
> -{
> - struct at91_cf_socket *cf;
> -
> - if (!sp)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - cf = container_of(s, struct at91_cf_socket, socket);
> -
> - /* NOTE: CF is always 3VCARD */
> - if (at91_cf_present(cf)) {
> - int rdy = gpio_is_valid(cf->board->irq_pin); /* RDY/nIRQ */
> - int vcc = gpio_is_valid(cf->board->vcc_pin);
> -
> - *sp = SS_DETECT | SS_3VCARD;
> - if (!rdy || gpio_get_value(cf->board->irq_pin))
> - *sp |= SS_READY;
> - if (!vcc || gpio_get_value(cf->board->vcc_pin))
> - *sp |= SS_POWERON;
> - } else
> - *sp = 0;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int
> -at91_cf_set_socket(struct pcmcia_socket *sock, struct socket_state_t *s)
> -{
> - struct at91_cf_socket *cf;
> -
> - cf = container_of(sock, struct at91_cf_socket, socket);
> -
> - /* switch Vcc if needed and possible */
> - if (gpio_is_valid(cf->board->vcc_pin)) {
> - switch (s->Vcc) {
> - case 0:
> - gpio_set_value(cf->board->vcc_pin, 0);
> - break;
> - case 33:
> - gpio_set_value(cf->board->vcc_pin, 1);
> - break;
> - default:
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - /* toggle reset if needed */
> - gpio_set_value(cf->board->rst_pin, s->flags & SS_RESET);
> -
> - dev_dbg(&cf->pdev->dev, "Vcc %d, io_irq %d, flags %04x csc %04x\n",
> - s->Vcc, s->io_irq, s->flags, s->csc_mask);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int at91_cf_ss_suspend(struct pcmcia_socket *s)
> -{
> - return at91_cf_set_socket(s, &dead_socket);
> -}
> -
> -/* we already mapped the I/O region */
> -static int at91_cf_set_io_map(struct pcmcia_socket *s, struct pccard_io_map *io)
> -{
> - struct at91_cf_socket *cf;
> - u32 csr;
> -
> - cf = container_of(s, struct at91_cf_socket, socket);
> - io->flags &= (MAP_ACTIVE | MAP_16BIT | MAP_AUTOSZ);
> -
> - /*
> - * Use 16 bit accesses unless/until we need 8-bit i/o space.
> - *
> - * NOTE: this CF controller ignores IOIS16, so we can't really do
> - * MAP_AUTOSZ. The 16bit mode allows single byte access on either
> - * D0-D7 (even addr) or D8-D15 (odd), so it's close enough for many
> - * purposes (and handles ide-cs).
> - *
> - * The 8bit mode is needed for odd byte access on D0-D7. It seems
> - * some cards only like that way to get at the odd byte, despite
> - * CF 3.0 spec table 35 also giving the D8-D15 option.
> - */
> - if (!(io->flags & (MAP_16BIT | MAP_AUTOSZ))) {
> - csr = AT91_MC_SMC_DBW_8;
> - dev_dbg(&cf->pdev->dev, "8bit i/o bus\n");
> - } else {
> - csr = AT91_MC_SMC_DBW_16;
> - dev_dbg(&cf->pdev->dev, "16bit i/o bus\n");
> - }
> - regmap_update_bits(mc, AT91_MC_SMC_CSR(cf->board->chipselect),
> - AT91_MC_SMC_DBW, csr);
> -
> - io->start = cf->socket.io_offset;
> - io->stop = io->start + SZ_2K - 1;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/* pcmcia layer maps/unmaps mem regions */
> -static int
> -at91_cf_set_mem_map(struct pcmcia_socket *s, struct pccard_mem_map *map)
> -{
> - struct at91_cf_socket *cf;
> -
> - if (map->card_start)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - cf = container_of(s, struct at91_cf_socket, socket);
> -
> - map->flags &= (MAP_ACTIVE | MAP_ATTRIB | MAP_16BIT);
> - if (map->flags & MAP_ATTRIB)
> - map->static_start = cf->phys_baseaddr + CF_ATTR_PHYS;
> - else
> - map->static_start = cf->phys_baseaddr + CF_MEM_PHYS;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static struct pccard_operations at91_cf_ops = {
> - .init = at91_cf_ss_init,
> - .suspend = at91_cf_ss_suspend,
> - .get_status = at91_cf_get_status,
> - .set_socket = at91_cf_set_socket,
> - .set_io_map = at91_cf_set_io_map,
> - .set_mem_map = at91_cf_set_mem_map,
> -};
> -
> -/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> -
> -static const struct of_device_id at91_cf_dt_ids[] = {
> - { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-cf" },
> - { /* sentinel */ }
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at91_cf_dt_ids);
> -
> -static int at91_cf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> -{
> - struct at91_cf_socket *cf;
> - struct at91_cf_data *board;
> - struct resource *io;
> - struct resource realio;
> - int status;
> -
> - board = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*board), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!board)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - board->irq_pin = of_get_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
> - board->det_pin = of_get_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, 1);
> - board->vcc_pin = of_get_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, 2);
> - board->rst_pin = of_get_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, 3);
> -
> - mc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91rm9200-sdramc");
> - if (IS_ERR(mc))
> - return PTR_ERR(mc);
> -
> - if (!gpio_is_valid(board->det_pin) || !gpio_is_valid(board->rst_pin))
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> - io = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> - if (!io)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> - cf = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cf), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!cf)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - cf->board = board;
> - cf->pdev = pdev;
> - cf->phys_baseaddr = io->start;
> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cf);
> -
> - /* must be a GPIO; ergo must trigger on both edges */
> - status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, board->det_pin, "cf_det");
> - if (status < 0)
> - return status;
> -
> - status = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, gpio_to_irq(board->det_pin),
> - at91_cf_irq, 0, "at91_cf detect", cf);
> - if (status < 0)
> - return status;
> -
> - device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
> -
> - status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, board->rst_pin, "cf_rst");
> - if (status < 0)
> - goto fail0a;
> -
> - if (gpio_is_valid(board->vcc_pin)) {
> - status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, board->vcc_pin, "cf_vcc");
> - if (status < 0)
> - goto fail0a;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * The card driver will request this irq later as needed.
> - * but it causes lots of "irqNN: nobody cared" messages
> - * unless we report that we handle everything (sigh).
> - * (Note: DK board doesn't wire the IRQ pin...)
> - */
> - if (gpio_is_valid(board->irq_pin)) {
> - status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, board->irq_pin, "cf_irq");
> - if (status < 0)
> - goto fail0a;
> -
> - status = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin),
> - at91_cf_irq, IRQF_SHARED, "at91_cf", cf);
> - if (status < 0)
> - goto fail0a;
> - cf->socket.pci_irq = gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin);
> - } else
> - cf->socket.pci_irq = nr_irqs + 1;
> -
> - /*
> - * pcmcia layer only remaps "real" memory not iospace
> - * io_offset is set to 0x10000 to avoid the check in static_find_io().
> - * */
> - cf->socket.io_offset = 0x10000;
> - realio.start = cf->socket.io_offset;
> - realio.end = realio.start + SZ_64K - 1;
> - status = pci_remap_iospace(&realio, cf->phys_baseaddr + CF_IO_PHYS);
> - if (status)
> - goto fail0a;
> -
> - /* reserve chip-select regions */
> - if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, io->start, resource_size(io), "at91_cf")) {
> - status = -ENXIO;
> - goto fail0a;
> - }
> -
> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "irqs det #%d, io #%d\n",
> - gpio_to_irq(board->det_pin), gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin));
> -
> - cf->socket.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> - cf->socket.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> - cf->socket.ops = &at91_cf_ops;
> - cf->socket.resource_ops = &pccard_static_ops;
> - cf->socket.features = SS_CAP_PCCARD | SS_CAP_STATIC_MAP
> - | SS_CAP_MEM_ALIGN;
> - cf->socket.map_size = SZ_2K;
> - cf->socket.io[0].res = io;
> -
> - status = pcmcia_register_socket(&cf->socket);
> - if (status < 0)
> - goto fail0a;
> -
> - return 0;
> -
> -fail0a:
> - device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 0);
> - return status;
> -}
> -
> -static int at91_cf_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> -{
> - struct at91_cf_socket *cf = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> -
> - pcmcia_unregister_socket(&cf->socket);
> - device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 0);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> -
> -static int at91_cf_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t mesg)
> -{
> - struct at91_cf_socket *cf = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> - struct at91_cf_data *board = cf->board;
> -
> - if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev)) {
> - enable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(board->det_pin));
> - if (gpio_is_valid(board->irq_pin))
> - enable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin));
> - }
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int at91_cf_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
> -{
> - struct at91_cf_socket *cf = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> - struct at91_cf_data *board = cf->board;
> -
> - if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev)) {
> - disable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(board->det_pin));
> - if (gpio_is_valid(board->irq_pin))
> - disable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(board->irq_pin));
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -#else
> -#define at91_cf_suspend NULL
> -#define at91_cf_resume NULL
> -#endif
> -
> -static struct platform_driver at91_cf_driver = {
> - .driver = {
> - .name = "at91_cf",
> - .of_match_table = at91_cf_dt_ids,
> - },
> - .probe = at91_cf_probe,
> - .remove = at91_cf_remove,
> - .suspend = at91_cf_suspend,
> - .resume = at91_cf_resume,
> -};
> -
> -module_platform_driver(at91_cf_driver);
> -
> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("AT91 Compact Flash Driver");
> -MODULE_AUTHOR("David Brownell");
> -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> -MODULE_ALIAS("platform:at91_cf");
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022, at 4:17 PM, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
>
> From: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia: remove AT91RM9200 Compact Flash driver
>
> As noted by Arnd Bergmann, "we used to have three drivers for the same
> hardware (pcmcia, pata and ide), and only the pcmcia driver remained
> in the tree after drivers/ide/ was removed and pata_at91 did not get
> converted to DT". "There is no dts file in tree that actually declares
> either of them, so chances are that nobody is actually using the CF
> slot on at91 any more."[1]
>
> On this rationale, remove the AT91RM9200 Compact Flash driver, which
> also assists in reaching "the goal of stopping exporting OF-specific
> APIs of gpiolib".[2]
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yy6d7TjqzUwGQnQa@penguin/
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
though we probably want to remove the binding at
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/atmel-at91_cf.txt
as well.
Arnd
On 25/09/2022 at 14:24, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 4:19 PM Dominik Brodowski
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> From: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia: remove AT91RM9200 Compact Flash driver
>>
>> As noted by Arnd Bergmann, "we used to have three drivers for the same
>> hardware (pcmcia, pata and ide), and only the pcmcia driver remained
>> in the tree after drivers/ide/ was removed and pata_at91 did not get
>> converted to DT". "There is no dts file in tree that actually declares
>> either of them, so chances are that nobody is actually using the CF
>> slot on at91 any more."[1]
>>
>> On this rationale, remove the AT91RM9200 Compact Flash driver, which
>> also assists in reaching "the goal of stopping exporting OF-specific
>> APIs of gpiolib".[2]
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yy6d7TjqzUwGQnQa@penguin/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
>
> If someone actually has an AT91 board with this hardware and
> want to be able to use it by converting this driver to device tree,
> this is the time to step up.
Agreed with what was said. If people want reference code to make this
driver revive, git history is there to help.
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
Regards,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas Ferre