2022-09-23 01:34:30

by Lu Baolu

Subject: [PATCH 0/6] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for Linux v6.1

Hi Joerg,

This includes patches queued for v6.1. It includes:

- Decouple PASID and PRI from SVA
- Add ESRTPS & ESIRTPS capability check
- Cleanups

The whole series is also available at:
https://github.com/LuBaolu/intel-iommu/commits/vtd-update-for-v6.1

Please consider them for next.

Best regards,
Baolu

Lu Baolu (5):
iommu/vt-d: Remove unnecessary SVA data accesses in page fault path
iommu/vt-d: Decouple PASID & PRI enabling from SVA
iommu/vt-d: Remove pasid_set_eafe()
iommu/vt-d: Avoid unnecessary global IRTE cache invalidation
iommu/vt-d: Avoid unnecessary global DMA cache invalidation

Yi Liu (1):
iommu/vt-d: Rename cap_5lp_support to cap_fl5lp_support

drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 7 ++-
drivers/iommu/intel/cap_audit.c | 4 +-
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 87 ++++++++---------------------
drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c | 6 +-
drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 12 +---
drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 62 +++-----------------
drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig | 5 +-
7 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)

--
2.34.1

2022-09-26 14:19:39

by Joerg Roedel

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for Linux v6.1

Hi Baolu,

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 08:42:00AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Lu Baolu (5):
> iommu/vt-d: Remove unnecessary SVA data accesses in page fault path
> iommu/vt-d: Decouple PASID & PRI enabling from SVA
> iommu/vt-d: Remove pasid_set_eafe()
> iommu/vt-d: Avoid unnecessary global IRTE cache invalidation
> iommu/vt-d: Avoid unnecessary global DMA cache invalidation
>
> Yi Liu (1):
> iommu/vt-d: Rename cap_5lp_support to cap_fl5lp_support

These don't apply cleanly on v6.0-rc4 or -rc7. Please rebase these
patches to my x86/vt-d branch and re-send.

Thanks,

Joerg

2022-09-26 14:46:41

by Lu Baolu

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for Linux v6.1

Hi Joerg,

On 2022/9/26 20:15, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Baolu,
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 08:42:00AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Lu Baolu (5):
>> iommu/vt-d: Remove unnecessary SVA data accesses in page fault path
>> iommu/vt-d: Decouple PASID & PRI enabling from SVA
>> iommu/vt-d: Remove pasid_set_eafe()
>> iommu/vt-d: Avoid unnecessary global IRTE cache invalidation
>> iommu/vt-d: Avoid unnecessary global DMA cache invalidation
>>
>> Yi Liu (1):
>> iommu/vt-d: Rename cap_5lp_support to cap_fl5lp_support
>
> These don't apply cleanly on v6.0-rc4 or -rc7. Please rebase these
> patches to my x86/vt-d branch and re-send.

This pull request is based on the next branch. There's a conflict
between

de9f8a91eb32 iommu/dma: Clean up Kconfig (core branch)

and

iommu/vt-d: Decouple PASID & PRI enabling from SVA (this series).

Do you prefer applying de9f8a91eb32 to vt-d branch, or let me send a new
v6.0-rc7 based pull request?

Best regards,
baolu

2022-09-26 15:52:30

by Joerg Roedel

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for Linux v6.1

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 08:38:09PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> Do you prefer applying de9f8a91eb32 to vt-d branch, or let me send a new
> v6.0-rc7 based pull request?

Yes, please send a v6.0-rc7 pull-request. I'd like to carry the conflict
resolution in the merge commit for next.

Regards,

Joerg

2022-09-26 16:39:07

by Lu Baolu

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for Linux v6.1

On 2022/9/26 21:01, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 08:38:09PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
>> Do you prefer applying de9f8a91eb32 to vt-d branch, or let me send a new
>> v6.0-rc7 based pull request?
> Yes, please send a v6.0-rc7 pull-request. I'd like to carry the conflict
> resolution in the merge commit for next.

Sure. A new pull request has been posted:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/[email protected]/

Best regards,
baolu