[PATCH v5 0/5] Hyper-V VTL support is already applied, however
there are couple of kernel test bot warning reported. This patch
series on top of [PATCH v5 0/5] Hyper-V VTL support fixes these.
I expect them to be squash commit on respective patches.
The first patch is to fix 1/5 of the series:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
The second patch is to fix 3/5 of the series:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Saurabh Sengar (2):
x86/init: Remove static for get/set_rtc_noop()
x86/hyperv: Allow hv_get_nmi_reason compilation irrespective of HYPERV
config
arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 10 +++++-----
arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 10:12:39PM -0700, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
> [PATCH v5 0/5] Hyper-V VTL support is already applied, however
> there are couple of kernel test bot warning reported. This patch
> series on top of [PATCH v5 0/5] Hyper-V VTL support fixes these.
> I expect them to be squash commit on respective patches.
That was supposed to happen when applying those using -rc7 as a base.
Wei, what's up?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 11:33:21AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 10:12:39PM -0700, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
> > [PATCH v5 0/5] Hyper-V VTL support is already applied, however
> > there are couple of kernel test bot warning reported. This patch
> > series on top of [PATCH v5 0/5] Hyper-V VTL support fixes these.
> > I expect them to be squash commit on respective patches.
>
> That was supposed to happen when applying those using -rc7 as a base.
>
> Wei, what's up?
I did use -rc7 as the base. This is what is in hyperv-next right now.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hyperv/linux.git/commit/?h=hyperv-next&id=25dcc7316ef7def25cdab3658ac665bf0ce0ddc5
I think Saurabh was responding to a report that was generated on his v5
series. I don't think the first patch is needed.
The second one is probably still needed.
Thanks,
Wei.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 04:17:26PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 11:33:21AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 10:12:39PM -0700, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
> > > [PATCH v5 0/5] Hyper-V VTL support is already applied, however
> > > there are couple of kernel test bot warning reported. This patch
> > > series on top of [PATCH v5 0/5] Hyper-V VTL support fixes these.
> > > I expect them to be squash commit on respective patches.
> >
> > That was supposed to happen when applying those using -rc7 as a base.
> >
> > Wei, what's up?
>
> I did use -rc7 as the base. This is what is in hyperv-next right now.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hyperv/linux.git/commit/?h=hyperv-next&id=25dcc7316ef7def25cdab3658ac665bf0ce0ddc5
>
> I think Saurabh was responding to a report that was generated on his v5
> series. I don't think the first patch is needed.
Never mind, I think I messed up when applying Saurabh's patch. I will
fix the tree today.
Thanks,
Wei.